IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v476y2023ics0304380022003489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the use of machine learning methods to improve the estimation of gross primary productivity of maize field with drip irrigation

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Hui
  • Zhou, Xiao
  • Dong, Yi
  • Wang, Yahui
  • Li, Sien

Abstract

As an important part of the energy-matter cycle, gross primary productivity (GPP) reflects the ability of plants to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The accurate estimation of GPP is critical to understanding the regional carbon cycle. With the development of machine learning (ML) theory, machine learning models are increasingly used to study complex phenomena with high variability in time and space. In this study, three machine learning models (Support vector regression (SVR), artificial neural network (ANN), and long short-term memory networks (LSTM)) were investigated for predicting GPP in northwest China and compared them with the traditional physical models. Carbon flux, various environmental factors, and maize growth indices were measured in the maize field over five years in northwest China. The rigorous analysis which included statistical comparison and cross-validation for the prediction of GPP confirmed that the machine learning models performed better than traditional physical models. And the SVR model performed the best among the considered ML models with the highest nash-efficiency coefficient and the lowest root mean squared error. The machine learning model also outperformed the traditional physical models on cloudy days and after irrigation. The SVR achieved good prediction accuracy and high stability. With different training data sets, the ANN and LSTM were relatively more sensitive to the training data set. When the training data was sufficient, SVR, ANN and LSTM could achieve similar prediction accuracy, but SVR was slightly higher. When the training data was small, the simulation accuracy of SVR was better than ANN and LSTM. The performance of ANN and LSTM was more sensitive to parameter selection, and the relationship between model performance and parameter selection had no obvious regularity. Based on this comprehensive comparison study, it was elicited that the SVR model can be successfully applied to GPP simulation of maize fields, which provided a new perspective for the application of machine learning modeling in GPP simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Hui & Zhou, Xiao & Dong, Yi & Wang, Yahui & Li, Sien, 2023. "On the use of machine learning methods to improve the estimation of gross primary productivity of maize field with drip irrigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:476:y:2023:i:c:s0304380022003489
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022003489
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Lu & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Guo, Weihua & Zhao, Peng & Chen, Xia & Xiao, Huan, 2015. "Ecosystem water use efficiency for a sparse vineyard in arid northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 24-33.
    2. Xianming Dou & Yongguo Yang & Jinhui Luo, 2018. "Estimating Forest Carbon Fluxes Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ran, Hui & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Zhang, Xiaotao, 2018. "Parameterization of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated maize for seed production in arid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 438-450.
    2. Gao, Lei & Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Lu, Hongna, 2019. "Surface soil water content dominates the difference between ecosystem and canopy water use efficiency in a sparse vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Chen, Rui & Chang, Hongda & Wang, Zhenhua & Lin, Haixia, 2023. "Determining organic-inorganic fertilizer application threshold to maximize the yield and quality of drip-irrigated grapes in an extremely arid area of Xinjiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Kadukothanahally Nagaraju Shivaprakash & Niraj Swami & Sagar Mysorekar & Roshni Arora & Aditya Gangadharan & Karishma Vohra & Madegowda Jadeyegowda & Joseph M. Kiesecker, 2022. "Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Cai, Jianchao & Xu, Kai & Zhu, Yanhui & Hu, Fang & Li, Liuhuan, 2020. "Prediction and analysis of net ecosystem carbon exchange based on gradient boosting regression and random forest," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Guo, Hui & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Liu, Wenfeng & Tong, Ling & Hao, Xinmei & Ding, Risheng, 2022. "The controlling factors of ecosystem water use efficiency in maize fields under drip and border irrigation systems in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    7. Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Wang, Hanbo & Caylor, Kelly K., 2017. "Comparison of multi-level water use efficiency between plastic film partially mulched and non-mulched croplands at eastern Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 215-226.
    8. Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Tong, Ling & Du, Taisheng, 2018. "Seasonal variations in vineyard ET partitioning and dual crop coefficients correlate with canopy development and surface soil moisture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 19-33.
    9. Guo, Hui & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Liu, Wenfeng & Tong, Ling & Hao, Xinmei & Ding, Risheng, 2022. "Comparison of several models for estimating gross primary production of drip-irrigated maize in arid regions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    10. Wang, Yu & Zhou, Li & Jia, Qingyu & Yu, Wenying, 2017. "Water use efficiency of a rice paddy field in Liaohe Delta, Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 222-231.
    11. Xing, Wanqiu & Yang, Lilin & Wang, Weiguang & Yu, Zhongbo & Shao, Quanxi & Xu, Shiqin & Fu, Jianyu, 2023. "Environmental controls on carbon and water fluxes of a wheat-maize rotation cropland over the Huaibei Plain of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Pang, Jiaping & Li, Hengpeng & Yu, Fuhe & Geng, Jianwei & Zhang, Wangshou, 2022. "Environmental controls on water use efficiency in a hilly tea plantation in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    13. Nanyan Zhu & Chen Liu & Andrew F. Laine & Jia Guo, 2020. "Understanding and Modeling Climate Impacts on Photosynthetic Dynamics with FLUXNET Data and Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, March.
    14. Ran, Hui & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Du, Taisheng & Li, Sien & Zhang, Xiaotao, 2017. "Performance of AquaCrop and SIMDualKc models in evapotranspiration partitioning on full and deficit irrigated maize for seed production under plastic film-mulch in an arid region of China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 20-32.
    15. Jiang, Shouzheng & Zhao, Lu & Liang, Chuan & Hu, Xiaotao & Yaosheng, Wang & Gong, Daozhi & Zheng, Shunsheng & Huang, Yaowei & He, QingYan & Cui, Ningbo, 2022. "Leaf- and ecosystem-scale water use efficiency and their controlling factors of a kiwifruit orchard in the humid region of Southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    16. Chen, Shichao & Du, Taisheng & Wang, Sufen & Parsons, David & Wu, Di & Guo, Xiuwei & Li, Donghao, 2021. "Quantifying the effects of spatial-temporal variability of soil properties on crop growth in management zones within an irrigated maize field in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    17. Hou, Mengjie & Tian, Fei & Zhang, Tong & Huang, Mengsi, 2019. "Evaluation of canopy temperature depression, transpiration, and canopy greenness in relation to yield of soybean at reproductive stage based on remote sensing imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 182-192.
    18. Jasna Petković & Nataša Petrović & Ivana Dragović & Kristina Stanojević & Jelena Andreja Radaković & Tatjana Borojević & Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar, 2019. "Youth and forecasting of sustainable development pillars: An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Abbasian, Hassan & Solgi, Eisa & Mohsen Hosseini, Seyed & Hossein Kia, Seyed, 2022. "Modeling terrestrial net ecosystem exchange using machine learning techniques based on flux tower measurements," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:476:y:2023:i:c:s0304380022003489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.