IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v443y2021ics0304380021000211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agent-based modelling of juvenile eel migration via selective tidal stream transport

Author

Listed:
  • Benson, Thomas
  • de Bie, Jasper
  • Gaskell, Jennifer
  • Vezza, Paolo
  • Kerr, James R.
  • Lumbroso, Darren
  • Owen, Markus R.
  • Kemp, Paul S.

Abstract

Recruitment of temperate eel species Anguilla anguilla, A. rostrata & A. japonica has declined over the last few decades due to human activities, such as overfishing and construction of migratory barriers (e.g. dams, weirs and sluices) and hazardous energy infrastructure (e.g. turbines, intakes and outfalls). Numerical models, substantiated with data from field and laboratory studies, can potentially predict and quantify the relative impacts of such activities, thereby assisting in the sustainable management of eel populations. Here, we present an agent-based model (ABM) of juvenile eel migration up estuaries. The model includes relevant eel behaviours and environmental conditions that, according to the literature, influence upstream migration. Crucially, by assessing the local salinity gradient and relative flow direction, the modelled eels (agents) self-determine whether the tide is flooding or ebbing and orientate themselves for navigation, with no top-down instructions. This allows the agents to decide which particular behaviour to undertake as part of Selective Tidal Stream Transport (STST). The developed ABM is coupled to a hydrodynamic model of the Thames Estuary and the results substantiated by comparison against eel trap data. Combinations of the various STST behaviours are systematically tested and the influence they have on up-estuary migration is assessed in terms of relative energy expenditure. The parameterised model is then used predictively at Milford Haven Waterway to investigate potential impacts on the juvenile eel population due to entrainment in a power plant cooling water intake and outfall. Results from the Thames model case study indicate that including bed anchoring behaviour is essential for achieving a good comparison with the eel trap data and the choice of salinity detection threshold is also important. If daylight avoidance (diel) behaviour is not included, the most energy efficient migration is achieved using just two STST behaviours (ebb tide bed anchoring and upward migration during flood). With diel behaviour included, energy expenditure is greater, but some efficiency is regained by including all of the STST behaviours. For the Milford Haven case study, the model predicted a juvenile eel intake and outfall entrainment rate of 2.0% and 4.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the ABM is a valuable tool for assessing potential impacts on the recruitment of eels (extendable to other species) and could be used to assist in site-selection and low impact design of energy infrastructure in tidal environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Benson, Thomas & de Bie, Jasper & Gaskell, Jennifer & Vezza, Paolo & Kerr, James R. & Lumbroso, Darren & Owen, Markus R. & Kemp, Paul S., 2021. "Agent-based modelling of juvenile eel migration via selective tidal stream transport," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:443:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021000211
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021000211
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rossington, Kate & Benson, Thomas, 2020. "An agent-based model to predict fish collisions with tidal stream turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1220-1229.
    2. Jager, Henriette I. & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2018. "The confluences of ideas leading to, and the flow of ideas emerging from, individual-based modeling of riverine fishes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 341-352.
    3. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Marceau, Danielle J., 2011. "The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1544-1556.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kerr, J.R. & Tummers, J.S. & Benson, T. & Lucas, M.C. & Kemp, P.S., 2023. "Modelling fine scale route choice of upstream migrating fish as they approach an instream structure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanapaux, William & Kiker, Gregory A., 2013. "Development and testing of an object-oriented model for adaptively managing human disturbance of least tern (Sternula antillarum) nesting habitat," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 64-77.
    2. Yun Eui Choi & Kihwan Song & Min Kim & Junga Lee, 2017. "Transformation Planning for Resilient Wildlife Habitats in Ecotourism Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Katherine A. Zeller & David W. Wattles & Javan M. Bauder & Stephen DeStefano, 2020. "Forecasting Seasonal Habitat Connectivity in a Developing Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Wang, Qianqian & Li, Pengcheng & Zhang, Wenming & Cong, Nan & Xi, Yuqian & Xiao, Lirong & Wang, Yihang & Yao, Weiwei, 2023. "Evaluating the cascade dam construction effects on endemic fish habitat and population status in spawning sites of Lancang River (in Tibet), China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    5. MacPherson, Brian & Gras, Robin, 2016. "Individual-based ecological models: Adjunctive tools or experimental systems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 106-114.
    6. Ringelman, Kevin M., 2014. "Predator foraging behavior and patterns of avian nest success: What can we learn from an agent-based model?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 141-149.
    7. Boyd, Robin & Roy, Shovonlal & Sibly, Richard & Thorpe, Robert & Hyder, Kieran, 2018. "A general approach to incorporating spatial and temporal variation in individual-based models of fish populations with application to Atlantic mackerel," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 9-17.
    8. Mamboleo, Abel Ansporthy & Doscher, Crile & Paterson, Adrian, 2021. "A computational modelling approach to human-elephant interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
    9. Kevin E Jablonski & Randall B Boone & Paul J Meiman, 2018. "An agent-based model of cattle grazing toxic Geyer's larkspur," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, March.
    10. He, Haosen & Buchholtz, Erin & Chen, Frederick & Vogel, Susanne & Yu, Chu A.(Alex), 2022. "An agent-based model of elephant crop consumption walks using combinatorial optimization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    11. Silvia, Chris & Krause, Rachel M., 2016. "Assessing the impact of policy interventions on the adoption of plug-in electric vehicles: An agent-based model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 105-118.
    12. Salau, Kehinde & Schoon, Michael L. & Baggio, Jacopo A. & Janssen, Marco A., 2012. "Varying effects of connectivity and dispersal on interacting species dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 81-91.
    13. Pirotta, Enrico & New, Leslie & Harwood, John & Lusseau, David, 2014. "Activities, motivations and disturbance: An agent-based model of bottlenose dolphin behavioral dynamics and interactions with tourism in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 44-58.
    14. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Tomback, Diana F. & Lorenz, Teresa & Marceau, Danielle, 2017. "Energetic behavioural-strategy prioritization of Clark’s nutcrackers in whitebark pine communities: An agent-based modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 123-139.
    15. Semeniuk, C.A.D. & Musiani, M. & Hebblewhite, M. & Grindal, S. & Marceau, D.J., 2012. "Incorporating behavioral–ecological strategies in pattern-oriented modeling of caribou habitat use in a highly industrialized landscape," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 18-32.
    16. Guillem, E.E. & Murray-Rust, D. & Robinson, D.T. & Barnes, A. & Rounsevell, M.D.A., 2015. "Modelling farmer decision-making to anticipate tradeoffs between provisioning ecosystem services and biodiversity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 12-23.
    17. Nathan, Lucas R. & Mamoozadeh, Nadya & Tumas, Hayley R. & Gunselman, Samuel & Klass, Keren & Metcalfe, Anya & Edge, Chris & Waits, Lisette P. & Spruell, Paul & Lowery, Erin & Connor, Ed & Bearlin, And, 2019. "A spatially-explicit, individual-based demogenetic simulation framework for evaluating hybridization dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 40-51.
    18. Casey C Day & Nicholas P McCann & Patrick A Zollner & Jonathan H Gilbert & David M MacFarland, 2019. "Temporal plasticity in habitat selection criteria explains patterns of animal dispersal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(2), pages 528-540.
    19. Wallentin, Gudrun, 2017. "Spatial simulation: A spatial perspective on individual-based ecology—a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 30-41.
    20. Rajabi, Mohammadreza & Mansourian, Ali & Pilesjö, Petter & Shirzadi, Mohammad Reza & Fadaei, Reza & Ramazanpour, Javad, 2018. "A spatially explicit agent-based simulation model of a reservoir host of cutaneous leishmaniasis, Rhombomys opimus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 33-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:443:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021000211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.