IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v440y2021ics0304380020304531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling structural mechanics of oyster reef self-organization including environmental constraints and community interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Yurek, Simeon
  • Eaton, Mitchell J.
  • Lavaud, Romain
  • Laney, R. Wilson
  • DeAngelis, Donald L.
  • Pine, William E.
  • La Peyre, Megan
  • Martin, Julien
  • Frederick, Peter
  • Wang, Hongqing
  • Lowe, Michael R.
  • Johnson, Fred
  • Camp, Edward V.
  • Mordecai, Rua

Abstract

Self-organization is a process of establishing and reinforcing local structures through feedbacks between internal population dynamics and external factors. In reef-building systems, substrate is collectively engineered by individuals that also occupy it and compete for space. Reefs are constrained spatially by the physical environment, and by mortality, which reduces production but exposes substrate for recruits. Reef self-organization therefore depends on efficient balancing of production and occupancy of substrate. To examine this, we develop a three-dimensional individual-based model (IBM) of oyster reef mechanics. Shell substrate is grown by individuals as valves, accumulates at the reef level, and degrades following mortality. Single restoration events and subsequent dynamics are simulated for a case study in South Carolina (USA). Variability in model processes is included on recruitment, spatial environmental constraints, and predation, over multiple independent runs and five predator community scenarios. The main goal for this study is to summarize trends in dynamics that are robust across this uncertainty, and from these generate new hypotheses and predictions for future studies. Simulation results demonstrate three phases following restoration: initial transient dynamics with considerable shell loss, followed by growth and saturation of the live population, and then saturation of settlement habitat several years later. Over half of simulations recoup initial shell losses as populations grow, while others continue in decline. The balance between population density, substrate supporting the reef, and exposed surfaces for settlement is mediated by overall population size and size structure, presence of predators, and relative amounts of live individuals and intact dead shells. The efficiency of settlement substrate production improves through time as population size structure becomes more complex, and the population of dead valves accumulates.

Suggested Citation

  • Yurek, Simeon & Eaton, Mitchell J. & Lavaud, Romain & Laney, R. Wilson & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Pine, William E. & La Peyre, Megan & Martin, Julien & Frederick, Peter & Wang, Hongqing & Lowe, Michael , 2021. "Modeling structural mechanics of oyster reef self-organization including environmental constraints and community interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:440:y:2021:i:c:s0304380020304531
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020304531
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katie K. Arkema & Greg Guannel & Gregory Verutes & Spencer A. Wood & Anne Guerry & Mary Ruckelshaus & Peter Kareiva & Martin Lacayo & Jessica M. Silver, 2013. "Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 913-918, October.
    2. Haller-Bull, Vanessa & Rovenskaya, Elena, 2019. "Optimizing functional groups in ecosystem models: Case study of the Great Barrier Reef," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    3. Wang, Hongqing & Huang, Wenrui & Harwell, Mark A. & Edmiston, Lee & Johnson, Elijah & Hsieh, Ping & Milla, Katherine & Christensen, John & Stewart, Jessica & Liu, Xiaohai, 2008. "Modeling oyster growth rate by coupling oyster population and hydrodynamic models for Apalachicola Bay, Florida, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 77-89.
    4. Yñiguez, Aletta T. & McManus, John W. & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2008. "Allowing macroalgae growth forms to emerge: Use of an agent-based model to understand the growth and spread of macroalgae in Florida coral reefs, with emphasis on Halimeda tuna," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 60-74.
    5. Lavaud, Romain & La Peyre, Megan K. & Casas, Sandra M. & Bacher, Cédric & La Peyre, Jérôme F., 2017. "Integrating the effects of salinity on the physiology of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in the northern Gulf of Mexico through a Dynamic Energy Budget model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 221-233.
    6. Quan-Xing Liu & Peter M. J. Herman & Wolf M. Mooij & Jef Huisman & Marten Scheffer & Han Olff & Johan van de Koppel, 2014. "Pattern formation at multiple spatial scales drives the resilience of mussel bed ecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Polhill, J. Gary & Giske, Jarl & Railsback, Steven F., 2010. "The ODD protocol: A review and first update," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2760-2768.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tan, Tjui Yeuw & Miraldo, Marcel Câmara & Fontes, Roberto Fioravanti Carelli & Vannucchi, Fabio Stucchi, 2022. "Assessing bivalve growth using bio-energetic models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Canal-Vergés, Paula & Potthoff, Michael & Hansen, Flemming Thorbjørn & Holmboe, Nikolaj & Rasmussen, Erik Kock & Flindt, Mogens R., 2014. "Eelgrass re-establishment in shallow estuaries is affected by drifting macroalgae – Evaluated by agent-based modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 116-128.
    2. Kjelland, Michael E. & Piercy, Candice D. & Lackey, Tahirih & Swannack, Todd M., 2015. "An integrated modeling approach for elucidating the effects of different management strategies on Chesapeake Bay oyster metapopulation dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 45-62.
    3. Glynn, Peter J & Glynn, Peter W & Maté, Juan & Riegl, Bernhard, 2020. "Agent-based model of Eastern Pacific damselfish and sea urchin interactions shows increased coral reef erosion under post-ENSO conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 423(C).
    4. Abinash Bhattachan & Matthew D. Jurjonas & Priscilla R. Morris & Paul J. Taillie & Lindsey S. Smart & Ryan E. Emanuel & Erin L. Seekamp, 2019. "Linking residential saltwater intrusion risk perceptions to physical exposure of climate change impacts in rural coastal communities of North Carolina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1277-1295, July.
    5. Tardy, Olivia & Lenglos, Christophe & Lai, Sandra & Berteaux, Dominique & Leighton, Patrick A., 2023. "Rabies transmission in the Arctic: An agent-based model reveals the effects of broad-scale movement strategies on contact risk between Arctic foxes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    6. Vimercati, Giovanni & Hui, Cang & Davies, Sarah J. & Measey, G. John, 2017. "Integrating age structured and landscape resistance models to disentangle invasion dynamics of a pond-breeding anuran," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 104-116.
    7. Jagadish, Arundhati & Dwivedi, Puneet & McEntire, Kira D. & Chandar, Mamta, 2019. "Agent-based modeling of “cleaner” cookstove adoption and woodfuel use: An integrative empirical approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Edward B. Barbier, 2016. "The Protective Value of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Services in a Wealth Accounting Framework," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(1), pages 37-58, May.
    9. Hinker, Jonas & Hemkendreis, Christian & Drewing, Emily & März, Steven & Hidalgo Rodríguez, Diego I. & Myrzik, Johanna M.A., 2017. "A novel conceptual model facilitating the derivation of agent-based models for analyzing socio-technical optimality gaps in the energy domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1219-1230.
    10. Wang, Jin-Shan & Wu, Yong-Ping & Li, Li & Sun, Gui-Quan, 2020. "Effect of mobility and predator switching on the dynamical behavior of a predator-prey model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Jens Lausen & Moritz Kohlhase, 2021. "Internalizing the externalities of overfunding: an agent-based model approach for analyzing the market dynamics on crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1387-1430, November.
    13. Crevier, Lucas Phillip & Salkeld, Joseph H & Marley, Jessa & Parrott, Lael, 2021. "Making the best possible choice: Using agent-based modelling to inform wildlife management in small communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    14. Ulfia A. Lenfers & Julius Weyl & Thomas Clemen, 2018. "Firewood Collection in South Africa: Adaptive Behavior in Social-Ecological Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    15. David, Viviane & Joachim, Sandrine & Tebby, Cleo & Porcher, Jean-Marc & Beaudouin, Rémy, 2019. "Modelling population dynamics in mesocosms using an individual-based model coupled to a bioenergetics model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 55-66.
    16. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    17. Moritz Kersting & Andreas Bossert & Leif Sörensen & Benjamin Wacker & Jan Chr. Schlüter, 2021. "Predicting effectiveness of countermeasures during the COVID-19 outbreak in South Africa using agent-based simulation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Meli, Mattia & Auclerc, Apolline & Palmqvist, Annemette & Forbes, Valery E. & Grimm, Volker, 2013. "Population-level consequences of spatially heterogeneous exposure to heavy metals in soil: An individual-based model of springtails," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 338-351.
    19. Groeneveld, Jürgen & Johst, Karin & Kawaguchi, So & Meyer, Bettina & Teschke, Mathias & Grimm, Volker, 2015. "How biological clocks and changing environmental conditions determine local population growth and species distribution in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba): a conceptual model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 78-86.
    20. Henzler, Julia & Weise, Hanna & Enright, Neal J. & Zander, Susanne & Tietjen, Britta, 2018. "A squeeze in the suitable fire interval: Simulating the persistence of fire-killed plants in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem under drier conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 389(C), pages 41-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:440:y:2021:i:c:s0304380020304531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.