IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v429y2020ics0304380020301460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the sensitivity of three Alaska marine food webs to perturbations: an example of Ecosim simulations using Rpath

Author

Listed:
  • Whitehouse, George A.
  • Aydin, Kerim Y.

Abstract

Ecosystem modelling is a useful tool for exploring the potential outcomes of policy options and conducting experiments that would otherwise be impractical in the real world. However, ecosystem models have been limited in their ability to engage in the management of living marine resources due in part to high levels of uncertainty in model parameters and model outputs. Additionally, for multispecies or food web models, there is uncertainty about the predator-prey functional response, which can have implications for population dynamics. In this study, we evaluate the sensitivity of large marine food webs in Alaska to parameter uncertainty, including parameters that govern the predator-prey functional response. We use Rpath, an R implementation of the food web modeling program Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), to conduct a series of mortality-based perturbations to examine the sensitivity and recovery time of higher trophic level groups in the eastern Chukchi Sea, eastern Bering Sea, and Gulf of Alaska. We use a Monte Carlo approach to generate thousands of plausible ecosystems by drawing parameter sets from the range of uncertainty around the base model parameters. We subjected the ecosystem ensembles to a series of mortality-based perturbations to identify which functional groups the higher trophic level groups are most sensitive to when their mortality was increased, whether the food webs returned to their unperturbed configurations following a perturbation, and how long it took to return to that state. In all three ecosystems, we found that the number of disrupted ensemble food webs was positively related to the biomass and the number of trophic links of the perturbed functional group, and negatively related to trophic level. The eastern Chukchi Sea was most sensitive to perturbations to benthic invertebrate groups, the eastern Bering Sea was most sensitive to shrimp and walleye pollock, and the Gulf of Alaska was most sensitive to shrimps, pelagic forage fish, and zooplankton. Recovery time to perturbations were generally less than 5 years in all three ecosystems. The recovery times when fish groups were perturbed were generally longer than when benthic invertebrates were perturbed, and recovery times were shortest when it was pelagic invertebrates. The single model ensemble approach produced simulation results that described a range of possible outcomes to the prescribed perturbations and provided a sense for how robust the results are to parameter uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Whitehouse, George A. & Aydin, Kerim Y., 2020. "Assessing the sensitivity of three Alaska marine food webs to perturbations: an example of Ecosim simulations using Rpath," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:429:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301460
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020301460
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huntington, Henry P. & Daniel, Raychelle & Hartsig, Andrew & Harun, Kevin & Heiman, Marilyn & Meehan, Rosa & Noongwook, George & Pearson, Leslie & Prior-Parks, Melissa & Robards, Martin & Stetson, Geo, 2015. "Vessels, risks, and rules: Planning for safe shipping in Bering Strait," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 119-127.
    2. Ortiz, Marco & Campos, Leonardo & Berrios, Fernando & Rodriguez, Fabián & Hermosillo, Brenda & González, Jorge, 2013. "Network properties and keystoneness assessment in different intertidal communities dominated by two ecosystem engineer species (SE Pacific coast): A comparative analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 307-318.
    3. Tony Pitcher & Daniela Kalikoski & Ganapathiraju Pramod & Katherine Short, 2009. "Not honouring the code," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7230), pages 658-659, February.
    4. Martin Edwards & Anthony J. Richardson, 2004. "Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7002), pages 881-884, August.
    5. Lucey, Sean M. & Gaichas, Sarah K. & Aydin, Kerim Y., 2020. "Conducting reproducible ecosystem modeling using the open source mass balance model Rpath," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
    6. Ortiz, Marco & Avendaño, Miguel & Campos, Leonardo & Berrios, Fernando, 2009. "Spatial and mass balanced trophic models of La Rinconada Marine Reserve (SE Pacific coast), a protected benthic ecosystem: Management strategy assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3413-3423.
    7. Colléter, Mathieu & Valls, Audrey & Guitton, Jérôme & Gascuel, Didier & Pauly, Daniel & Christensen, Villy, 2015. "Global overview of the applications of the Ecopath with Ecosim modeling approach using the EcoBase models repository," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 302(C), pages 42-53.
    8. Murawski, Steven A., 2007. "Ten myths concerning ecosystem approaches to marine resource management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 681-690, November.
    9. Koehn, Laura E. & Essington, Timothy E. & Marshall, Kristin N. & Kaplan, Isaac C. & Sydeman, William J. & Szoboszlai, Amber I. & Thayer, Julie A., 2016. "Developing a high taxonomic resolution food web model to assess the functional role of forage fish in the California Current ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 335(C), pages 87-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heinichen, Margaret & McManus, M. Conor & Lucey, Sean M. & Aydin, Kerim & Humphries, Austin & Innes-Gold, Anne & Collie, Jeremy, 2022. "Incorporating temperature-dependent fish bioenergetics into a Narragansett Bay food web model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ortiz, Marco & Berrios, Fernando & Campos, Leonardo & Uribe, Roberto & Ramirez, Alejandro & Hermosillo-Núñez, Brenda & González, Jorge & Rodriguez-Zaragoza, Fabián, 2015. "Mass balanced trophic models and short-term dynamical simulations for benthic ecological systems of Mejillones and Antofagasta bays (SE Pacific): Comparative network structure and assessment of human ," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 153-162.
    2. Thomas C. Malone & Paul M. DiGiacomo & Emanuel Gonçalves & Anthony H. Knap & Liana Talaue‐McManus & Stephen de Mora & Jose Muelbert, 2014. "Enhancing the Global Ocean Observing System to meet evidence based needs for the ecosystem‐based management of coastal ecosystem services," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(3), pages 168-181, August.
    3. Heinichen, Margaret & McManus, M. Conor & Lucey, Sean M. & Aydin, Kerim & Humphries, Austin & Innes-Gold, Anne & Collie, Jeremy, 2022. "Incorporating temperature-dependent fish bioenergetics into a Narragansett Bay food web model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    4. Sadchatheeswaran, Saachi & Branch, George M. & Shannon, Lynne J. & Coll, Marta & Steenbeek, Jeroen, 2021. "A novel approach to explicitly model the spatiotemporal impacts of structural complexity created by alien ecosystem engineers in a marine benthic environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 459(C).
    5. Holland, Daniel S. & Herrera, Guillermo E., 2012. "The impact of age structure, uncertainty, and asymmetric spatial dynamics on regulatory performance in a fishery metapopulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 207-218.
    6. Gianelli, Ignacio & Martínez, Gastón & Defeo, Omar, 2015. "An ecosystem approach to small-scale co-managed fisheries: The yellow clam fishery in Uruguay," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-202.
    7. Hongsheng Bi & Rubao Ji & Hui Liu & Young-Heon Jo & Jonathan A Hare, 2014. "Decadal Changes in Zooplankton of the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Crow White & Christopher Costello, 2014. "Close the High Seas to Fishing?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-5, March.
    9. Galaz, Victor & Crona, Beatrice & Österblom, Henrik & Olsson, Per & Folke, Carl, 2012. "Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries — Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-32.
    10. Malone, Thomas C. & DiGiacomo, Paul M. & Gonçalves, Emanuel & Knap, Anthony H. & Talaue-McManus, Liana & de Mora, Stephen, 2014. "A global ocean observing system framework for sustainable development," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 262-272.
    11. Tesfaye, Gashaw & Wolff, Matthias, 2018. "Modeling trophic interactions and the impact of an introduced exotic carp species in the Rift Valley Lake Koka, Ethiopia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 378(C), pages 26-36.
    12. Agudelo, César Augusto Ruiz & Bustos, Sandra Liliana Hurtado & Moreno, Carmen Alicia Parrado, 2020. "Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. A critical review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    13. Tyler D Eddy & Jonathan P A Gardner & Alejandro Pérez-Matus, 2010. "Applying Fishers' Ecological Knowledge to Construct Past and Future Lobster Stocks in the Juan Fernández Archipelago, Chile," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Marianna Cavallo & Alicia Bugeja Said & José A Pérez Agúndez, 2023. "Who Is in and Who Is out in Ocean Economies Development?," Post-Print hal-04044150, HAL.
    15. Quentin Grafton, R., 2010. "Adaptation to climate change in marine capture fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 606-615, May.
    16. Ratté-Fortin, Claudie & Plante, Jean-François & Rousseau, Alain N. & Chokmani, Karem, 2023. "Parametric versus nonparametric machine learning modelling for conditional density estimation of natural events: Application to harmful algal blooms," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    17. Gretta Pecl & Tim Ward & Zoë Doubleday & Steven Clarke & Jemery Day & Cameron Dixon & Stewart Frusher & Philip Gibbs & Alistair Hobday & Neil Hutchinson & Sarah Jennings & Keith Jones & Xiaoxu Li & Da, 2014. "Rapid assessment of fisheries species sensitivity to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 505-520, December.
    18. Link, Jason S. & Pranovi, Fabio & Libralato, Simone, 2022. "Simulations and interpretations of cumulative trophic theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    19. Rui Xia & Yuan Zhang & Andrea Critto & Jieyun Wu & Juntao Fan & Zhirong Zheng & Yizhang Zhang, 2016. "The Potential Impacts of Climate Change Factors on Freshwater Eutrophication: Implications for Research and Countermeasures of Water Management in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Richard W. Ryan & Daniel S. Holland & Guillermo E. Herrera, 2014. "Ecosystem Externalities in Fisheries," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 39-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:429:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.