IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v404y2019icp83-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effective hydrological neighborhood: A new concept to formulate harvest area constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Giménez, J.C.
  • Diaz-Balteiro, L.
  • Bertomeu, M.

Abstract

Forest managers have struggled to develop several measures to mitigate the impacts of logging operations on soil erosion. Two measures have consisted in considering slope restrictions and limiting the size of clearcut harvest areas in timber harvest scheduling models by means of adjacency constraints. However, these constraints build on an externally predefined limit on harvest area valid to all stands regardless of their topographic features. Thus, we present a methodology to formulate maximum harvest area constraints for each stand on the basis of its topographic features and hydrological connectivity. Using a grid-based digital elevation model, we first introduce the concept of the “Effective Hydrological Neighborhood” and propose a method to compute it through the analyses of water flow directions and the LS topographic factor of the USLE. Then, we develop a recursive procedure to compute for each stand the maximum harvest area in any single period and in consecutive periods of the planning horizon. Finally, we formulate a set of maximum harvest area constraints for each stand. The methodology is applied to a eucalyptus plantation in northwestern Spain. The constraints can then be considered in strategic timber harvest scheduling models along with other constraints. In this way, the harvest plans derived at this planning level can be compatible with later solutions considering hydrological connectivity concerns at the tactical level.

Suggested Citation

  • Giménez, J.C. & Diaz-Balteiro, L. & Bertomeu, M., 2019. "The effective hydrological neighborhood: A new concept to formulate harvest area constraints," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 83-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:404:y:2019:i:c:p:83-90
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019300869
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcos Goycoolea & Alan T. Murray & Francisco Barahona & Rafael Epstein & Andrés Weintraub, 2005. "Harvest Scheduling Subject to Maximum Area Restrictions: Exploring Exact Approaches," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 490-500, June.
    2. Boston, Kevin & Bettinger, Pete, 2006. "An economic and landscape evaluation of the green-up rules for California, Oregon, and Washington (USA)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 251-266, April.
    3. Ashagre, Biniam B. & Platts, Philip J. & Njana, Marco & Burgess, Neil D. & Balmford, Andrew & Turner, R. Kerry & Schaafsma, Marije, 2018. "Integrated modelling for economic valuation of the role of forests and woodlands in drinking water provision to two African cities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 50-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Könnyű, Nóra & Tóth, Sándor F., 2013. "A cutting plane method for solving harvest scheduling models with area restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 236-248.
    2. Isabel Martins & Filipe Alvelos & Miguel Constantino, 2012. "A branch-and-price approach for harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 363-385, January.
    3. Sinha, Ankur & Rämö, Janne & Malo, Pekka & Kallio, Markku & Tahvonen, Olli, 2017. "Optimal management of naturally regenerating uneven-aged forests," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 886-900.
    4. Edward B. Barbier & Angela Cindy Emefa Mensah & Michelan Wilson, 2023. "Valuing the Environment as Input, Ecosystem Services and Developing Countries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(3), pages 677-694, March.
    5. Alan T. Murray & Ran Wei & Richard L. Church & Matthew R. Niblett, 2019. "Addressing risks and uncertainty in forest land use modeling," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 319-338, September.
    6. Ran Wei & Alan Murray, 2015. "Spatial uncertainty in harvest scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 232(1), pages 275-289, September.
    7. T. Gómez & M. Hernández & J. Molina & M. León & E. Aldana & R. Caballero, 2011. "A multiobjective model for forest planning with adjacency constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 75-92, October.
    8. Augustynczik, A.L.D. & Arce, J.E. & Silva, A.C.L., 2016. "Aggregating forest harvesting activities in forest plantations through Integer Linear Programming and Goal Programming," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 72-81.
    9. Isabel Martins & Mujing Ye & Miguel Constantino & Maria Conceição Fonseca & Jorge Cadima, 2014. "Modeling target volume flows in forest harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 343-362, April.
    10. Andres Weintraub P., 2007. "Integer programming in forestry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 209-216, February.
    11. Teresa Neto & Miguel Constantino & Isabel Martins & João Pedro Pedroso, 2017. "Forest harvest scheduling with clearcut and core area constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 453-478, November.
    12. Hernandez, M. & Gómez, T. & Molina, J. & León, M.A. & Caballero, R., 2014. "Efficiency in forest management: A multiobjective harvest scheduling model," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 236-251.
    13. Rachel St. John & Sándor Tóth, 2015. "Spatially explicit forest harvest scheduling with difference equations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 232(1), pages 235-257, September.
    14. Oğuzhan Ahmet Arık, 2021. "Long-term Plantation and Harvesting Planning for Industrial Plantation Forest Areas," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Rodolfo Carvajal & Miguel Constantino & Marcos Goycoolea & Juan Pablo Vielma & Andrés Weintraub, 2013. "Imposing Connectivity Constraints in Forest Planning Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 824-836, August.
    16. Andrea Momblanch & Lindsay Beevers & Pradeep Srinivasalu & Anil Kulkarni & Ian P. Holman, 2020. "Enhancing production and flow of freshwater ecosystem services in a managed Himalayan river system under uncertain future climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 343-361, September.
    17. Neto, Teresa & Constantino, Miguel & Martins, Isabel & Pedroso, João Pedro, 2020. "A multi-objective Monte Carlo tree search for forest harvest scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1115-1126.
    18. Jones, Philip C. & Ohlmann, Jeffrey W., 2008. "Long-range timber supply planning for a vertically integrated paper mill," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 558-571, December.
    19. Dong, Lingbo & Lu, Wei & Liu, Zhaogang, 2018. "Developing alternative forest spatial management plans when carbon and timber values are considered: A real case from northeastern China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 45-57.
    20. Philip J. Platts & Marije Schaafsma & R. Kerry Turner & Neil D. Burgess & Brendan Fisher & Boniface P. Mbilinyi & Pantaleo K. T. Munishi & Taylor H. Ricketts & Ruth D. Swetnam & Antje Ahrends & Biniam, 2023. "Inequitable Gains and Losses from Conservation in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(3), pages 381-405, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:404:y:2019:i:c:p:83-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.