IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v370y2018icp59-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploitative competition of invaders differentially influences the diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages in spatially heterogeneous environments

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattacharyya, Joydeb
  • Roelke, Daniel L.
  • Muhl, Rika M.W.
  • Withrow, Frances G.

Abstract

Recent theoretical research suggested that species-supersaturated phytoplankton assemblages sustained through neutrality, lumpy coexistence or intransitivity were sensitive to immigration, quickly losing diversity following invasions. The presence of source patches, however, may facilitate persistence of species-supersaturation in the face of invaders. We explore that notion here through simulation analyses of more detailed spatially explicit models depicting one- and two-dimensional systems (“pipe” and “two-eddy” models, respectively) where water circulation is governed over a range of advection and turbulent diffusion. For the pipe model, when advection and turbulent diffusion are low, and when advection is high and turbulent diffusion is low, resident assemblages are more resistant to invaders. But at intermediate rates of advection and with increases to turbulent diffusion, assemblages are more quickly impacted by invaders. For the two-eddy model, when advection and turbulent diffusion are low, resident assemblages are again resistant to invaders, but only for lumpy assemblages. In contrast to the “pipe” model, resistance to invaders of neutral and lumpy assemblages is high when advection and turbulent diffusion are high. For both model configurations, intransitive assemblages were much more sensitive to invaders, suggesting that intransitivity might not be as prevalent a biodiversity-sustaining mechanism in spatially heterogeneous plankton systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattacharyya, Joydeb & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Withrow, Frances G., 2018. "Exploitative competition of invaders differentially influences the diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages in spatially heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 59-66.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:370:y:2018:i:c:p:59-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380017305033
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Withrow, Frances G. & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Bhattacharyya, Joydeb, 2018. "Water column processes differentially influence richness and diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 22-32.
    2. Daniel L Roelke & Sofie Spatharis, 2015. "Phytoplankton Assemblage Characteristics in Recurrently Fluctuating Environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Brian J. McGill, 2003. "A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6934), pages 881-885, April.
    4. Adjou, Mohamed & Bendtsen, Jørgen & Richardson, Katherine, 2012. "Modeling the influence from ocean transport, mixing and grazing on phytoplankton diversity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 19-27.
    5. Roelke, Daniel L. & Eldridge, Peter M., 2010. "Losers in the ‘Rock-Paper-Scissors’ game: The role of non-hierarchical competition and chaos as biodiversity sustaining agents in aquatic systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(7), pages 1017-1027.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Withrow, Frances G. & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Bhattacharyya, Joydeb, 2018. "Water column processes differentially influence richness and diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 22-32.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Withrow, Frances G. & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Bhattacharyya, Joydeb, 2018. "Water column processes differentially influence richness and diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 22-32.
    2. Sierra E, Cagle & Daniel L, Roelke, 2021. "Relative roles of fundamental processes underpinning PEG dynamics in dimictic lakes as revealed by a self-organizing, multi-population plankton model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 462(C).
    3. Smeti, Evangelia & Roelke, Daniel L. & Tsirtsis, George & Spatharis, Sofie, 2018. "Species extinctions strengthen the relationship between biodiversity and resource use efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 75-86.
    4. Köhler, Peter & Huth, Andreas, 2007. "Impacts of recruitment limitation and canopy disturbance on tropical tree species richness," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 511-517.
    5. Han, Zhi-Quan & Liu, Tong & Zhao, Wen-Xuan & Wang, Han-Yue & Sun, Qin-Ming & Sun, Hui & Li, Bai-Lian, 2022. "A new species abundance distribution model including the hydrological niche differentiation in water-limited ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    6. Yosef E Maruvka & Nadav M Shnerb, 2009. "Polymorphism Data Can Reveal the Origin of Species Abundance Statistics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-6, April.
    7. Kolasa, Jurek & Allen, Craig R. & Sendzimir, Jan & Stow, Craig A., 2012. "Predictions and retrodictions of the hierarchical representation of habitat in heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 199-207.
    8. Yang, Yinghui & Bao, Liping, 2022. "Scale-dependent changes in species richness caused by invader competition," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    9. Tancredi Caruso & Jeff R Powell & Matthias C Rillig, 2012. "Compositional Divergence and Convergence in Local Communities and Spatially Structured Landscapes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-10, April.
    10. Urban, Natasha A. & Matter, Stephen F., 2018. "Metapopulation mirages: Problems parsing process from pattern," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 375(C), pages 20-29.
    11. Beeravolu, Champak R. & Couteron, Pierre & Pélissier, Raphaël & Munoz, François, 2009. "Studying ecological communities from a neutral standpoint: A review of models’ structure and parameter estimation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2603-2610.
    12. Tsirtsis, George & Spatharis, Sofie, 2011. "Simulating the structure of natural phytoplankton assemblages: Descriptive vs. mechanistic models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 1922-1928.
    13. Engen, Steinar & Aagaard, Kaare & Bongard, Terje, 2011. "Disentangling the effects of heterogeneity, stochastic dynamics and sampling in a community of aquatic insects," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1387-1393.
    14. Edgardo Brigatti & Estevan Augusto Amazonas Mendes, 2021. "Testing macroecological theories in cryptocurrency market: neutral models can not describe diversity patterns and their variation," Papers 2111.02067, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    15. Schreiber, Sebastian J. & Killingback, Timothy P., 2013. "Spatial heterogeneity promotes coexistence of rock–paper–scissors metacommunities," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Gatti, Roberto Cazzolla & Hordijk, Wim & Kauffman, Stuart, 2017. "Biodiversity is autocatalytic," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 70-76.
    17. Moscoso, Jordyn E. & Bianchi, Daniele & Stewart, Andrew L., 2022. "Controls and characteristics of biomass quantization in size-structured planktonic ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    18. Zakharova, L. & Meyer, K.M. & Seifan, M., 2019. "Trait-based modelling in ecology: A review of two decades of research," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:370:y:2018:i:c:p:59-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.