IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v309-310y2015ip110-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical model of livestock and wildlife: Predation and competition under environmental disturbances

Author

Listed:
  • Laguna, M.F.
  • Abramson, G.
  • Kuperman, M.N.
  • Lanata, J.L.
  • Monjeau, J.A.

Abstract

Inspired by real scenarios in Northern Patagonia, we analyze a mathematical model of a simple trophic web with two herbivores and one predator. The studied situations represent a common practice in the steppes of Argentine Patagonia, where livestock are raised in a semi-wild state, either on the open range or enclosed, coexisting with competitors and predators. In the present work, the competing herbivores represent sheep and guanacos, while the predator is associated with the puma. The proposed model combines the concepts of metapopulations and patches dynamics, and includes an explicit hierarchical competition between species, which affects their prospect to colonize an empty patch when having to compete with other species. We perform numerical simulations of spatially extended metapopulations assemblages of the system, which allow us to incorporate the effects of habitat heterogeneity and destruction. The numerical results are compared with those obtained from mean field calculations. We find that the model provides a good theoretical framework in several situations, including the control of the wild populations that the ranchers exert to different extent. Furthermore, the present formulation incorporates new terms in previously analyzed models that help to reveal the important effects due to the heterogeneous nature of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Laguna, M.F. & Abramson, G. & Kuperman, M.N. & Lanata, J.L. & Monjeau, J.A., 2015. "Mathematical model of livestock and wildlife: Predation and competition under environmental disturbances," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 110-117.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:309-310:y:2015:i::p:110-117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015001714
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilkka Hanski & Otso Ovaskainen, 2000. "The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6779), pages 755-758, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Shangge & Jian, Jinfeng & Poopal, Rama Krishnan & Chen, Xinyu & He, Yaqi & Xu, Hongbin & Yu, Huimin & Ren, Zongming, 2022. "Mathematical modeling in behavior responses: The tendency-prediction based on a persistence model on real-time data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    2. Daza C., Y.C. & Laguna, M.F. & Monjeau, J.A. & Abramson, G., 2019. "Waves of desertification in a competitive ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 42-49.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joyce Maschinski & Michael Ross & Hong Liu & Joe O’Brien & Eric Wettberg & Kristin Haskins, 2011. "Sinking ships: conservation options for endemic taxa threatened by sea level rise," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 147-167, July.
    2. Vuilleumier, Séverine & Fontanillas, Pierre, 2007. "Landscape structure affects dispersal in the greater white-toothed shrew: Inference between genetic and simulated ecological distances," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 369-376.
    3. Drielsma, Michael & Love, Jamie, 2021. "An equitable method for evaluating habitat amount and potential occupancy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    4. Cornell, Stephen J. & Ovaskainen, Otso, 2008. "Exact asymptotic analysis for metapopulation dynamics on correlated dynamic landscapes," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 209-225.
    5. Christensen, Claire & Albert, István & Grenfell, Bryan & Albert, Réka, 2010. "Disease dynamics in a dynamic social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(13), pages 2663-2674.
    6. Eriksson, A. & Elías-Wolff, F. & Mehlig, B., 2013. "Metapopulation dynamics on the brink of extinction," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 101-122.
    7. d’Acampora, Bárbara H.A. & Higueras, Ester & Román, Emilia, 2018. "Combining different metrics to measure the ecological connectivity of two mangrove landscapes in the Municipality of Florianópolis, Southern Brazil," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 103-110.
    8. Bodin, Örjan & Saura, Santiago, 2010. "Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2393-2405.
    9. Zhouqiao Ren & Jianhua He & Qiaobing Yue, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of Urban Expansion on Surrounding Forested Landscape Connectivity across Space and Time," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Bauer, Dana Marie & Swallow, Stephen K. & Paton, Peter W.C., 2010. "Cost-effective species conservation in exurban communities: A spatial analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 180-202, April.
    11. Peck, Steven L., 2012. "Networks of habitat patches in tsetse fly control: Implications of metapopulation structure on assessing local extinction probabilities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 246(C), pages 99-102.
    12. Vuilleumier, Séverine & Possingham, Hugh P., 2012. "Interacting populations in heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 96-105.
    13. Gaaff, Aris & Reinhard, Stijn, 2012. "Incorporating the value of ecological networks into cost–benefit analysis to improve spatially explicit land-use planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 66-74.
    14. Munoz, François & Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier & Kjellberg, Finn, 2007. "Spectral analysis of simulated species distribution maps provides insights into metapopulation dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 314-322.
    15. Hashem Althagafi & Sergei Petrovskii, 2021. "Metapopulation Persistence and Extinction in a Fragmented Random Habitat: A Simulation Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Bauer, Dana Marie & Swallow, Stephen K., 2013. "Conserving metapopulations in human-altered landscapes at the urban–rural fringe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 159-170.
    17. J Nevil Amos & Andrew F Bennett & Ralph Mac Nally & Graeme Newell & Alexandra Pavlova & James Q Radford & James R Thomson & Matt White & Paul Sunnucks, 2012. "Predicting Landscape-Genetic Consequences of Habitat Loss, Fragmentation and Mobility for Multiple Species of Woodland Birds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, February.
    18. M. Heino & I. Hanski, 2000. "Evolution of Migration Rate in a Spatially Realistic Metapopulation Model," Working Papers ir00044, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    19. Ventura, Paulo C. & Tokuda, Eric K. & da F. Costa, Luciano & Rodrigues, Francisco A., 2023. "A Markov chain for metapopulations of small sizes with attraction landscape," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Liu, Xiaoqian & Bearup, Daniel & Liao, Jinbao, 2022. "Metacommunity robustness to invasion in mutualistic and antagonistic networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:309-310:y:2015:i::p:110-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.