IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v305y2015icp1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What factors affect the survival of tree saplings under browsing, and how can a loss of admixed tree species be forecast?

Author

Listed:
  • Clasen, Christian
  • Heurich, Marco
  • Glaesener, Laurent
  • Kennel, Eckhard
  • Knoke, Thomas

Abstract

The influence of ungulates on tree saplings is well documented. However, few models can predict the future consequences of browsing—for example, their effect on the development of the species composition of a tree stand. When a certain threshold of browsing intensity is reached, a particular silvicultural target – such as a mixed species forest – may be jeopardized. In this work, we present a model approach that addresses the question of how many individual trees will survive under the impact of ungulates, and thus, predicts possible tree regeneration failure. The model considers complex interactions between ungulates and tree saplings which are based on commonly used assumptions derived from a review of the literature. The model is based on a stochastic process including browsing percentages, hazard times (years until saplings are no longer endangered due to browsing) and browsing tolerances of tree saplings. A negative binomial distribution of browsing events is used to simulate leader shoot browsing of a regeneration area. The use of this type of distribution is an innovation we have implemented in order to consider spatially clustered browsing occurrences instead of a random binomial distribution models normally take into account. In comparison with alternative modelling approaches that are quite complex due to the input parameters used, we see advantages of using our model to predict browsing-induced regeneration failure of tree species, both for practical reasons and due to the plausibility of the results obtained. This type of model enables the prediction of the expected loss of admixed tree species under browsing and is an important first step in evaluating economic losses. Using the more clustered distribution type to indicate browsing events, predicts higher levels of damage than obtained using a random browsing component.

Suggested Citation

  • Clasen, Christian & Heurich, Marco & Glaesener, Laurent & Kennel, Eckhard & Knoke, Thomas, 2015. "What factors affect the survival of tree saplings under browsing, and how can a loss of admixed tree species be forecast?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 305(C), pages 1-9.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:305:y:2015:i:c:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015000952
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seidl, Rupert & Fernandes, Paulo M. & Fonseca, Teresa F. & Gillet, François & Jönsson, Anna Maria & Merganičová, Katarína & Netherer, Sigrid & Arpaci, Alexander & Bontemps, Jean-Daniel & Bugmann, Hara, 2011. "Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 903-924.
    2. Clasen, Christian & Griess, Verena C. & Knoke, Thomas, 2011. "Financial consequences of losing admixed tree species: A new approach to value increased financial risks by ungulate browsing," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 503-511, July.
    3. Knoke, Thomas & Moog, Martin & Plusczyk, Niels, 2001. "On the effect of volatile stumpage prices on the economic attractiveness of a silvicultural transformation strategy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3-4), pages 229-240, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roessiger, Joerg & Griess, Verena C. & Härtl, Fabian & Clasen, Christian & Knoke, Thomas, 2013. "How economic performance of a stand increases due to decreased failure risk associated with the admixing of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 58-69.
    2. Schou, Erik & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl & Kristensen, Kristian Løkke, 2012. "An economic evaluation of strategies for transforming even-aged into near-natural forestry in a conifer-dominated forest in Denmark," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 89-98.
    3. Ameztegui, Aitor & Coll, Lluís & Messier, Christian, 2015. "Modelling the effect of climate-induced changes in recruitment and juvenile growth on mixed-forest dynamics: The case of montane–subalpine Pyrenean ecotones," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 84-93.
    4. Wildberg, Johannes & Möhring, Bernhard, 2019. "Empirical analysis of the economic effect of tree species diversity based on the results of a forest accountancy data network," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Rakotoarison, Hanitra & Loisel, Patrice, 2016. "The Faustmann model under storm risk and price uncertainty: A case study of European beech in Northwestern France," MPRA Paper 85114, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Blattert, Clemens & Eyvindson, Kyle & Hartikainen, Markus & Burgas, Daniel & Potterf, Maria & Lukkarinen, Jani & Snäll, Tord & Toraño-Caicoya, Astor & Mönkkönen, Mikko, 2022. "Sectoral policies cause incoherence in forest management and ecosystem service provisioning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Rau, E-Ping & Fischer, Fabian & Joetzjer, Émilie & Maréchaux, Isabelle & Sun, I Fang & Chave, Jérôme, 2022. "Transferability of an individual- and trait-based forest dynamics model: A test case across the tropics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    8. Haga, Chihiro & Hotta, Wataru & Inoue, Takahiro & Matsui, Takanori & Aiba, Masahiro & Owari, Toshiaki & Suzuki, Satoshi N. & Shibata, Hideaki & Morimoto, Junko, 2022. "Modeling Tree Recovery in Wind-Disturbed Forests with Dense Understory Species under Climate Change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    9. Fitts, Lucia A. & Fraser, Jacob S. & Miranda, Brian R. & Domke, Grant M. & Russell, Matthew B. & Sturtevant, Brian R., 2023. "An iterative site-scale approach to calibrate and corroborate successional processes within a forest landscape model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    10. L. Bílek & J. Remeš & O. Švec & D. Zahradník, 2013. "On the way to continuous cover forest at middle elevations - the question of forest structure and specific site characteristics," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(10), pages 391-397.
    11. Peringer, Alexander & Buttler, Alexandre & Gillet, François & Pătru-Stupariu, Ileana & Schulze, Kiowa A. & Stupariu, Mihai-Sorin & Rosenthal, Gert, 2017. "Disturbance-grazer-vegetation interactions maintain habitat diversity in mountain pasture-woodlands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 301-310.
    12. J. Remeš, 2006. "Transformation of even-aged spruce stands at the School Forest Enterprise Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Structure and final cutting of mature stand," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 158-171.
    13. Jafarov, Elchin E. & Loudermilk, Louise E. & Hiers, Kevin J. & Williams, Brett & Linn, Rodman & Jones, Chas & Hill, Samantha C. & Atchley, Adam L., 2021. "Linking habitat suitability with a longleaf pine-hardwood model: Building a species-predictive fire-land management framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    14. Bastit, Félix & Brunette, Marielle & Montagné-Huck, Claire, 2023. "Pests, wind and fire: A multi-hazard risk review for natural disturbances in forests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Price, Jessica & Silbernagel, Janet & Miller, Nicholas & Swaty, Randy & White, Mark & Nixon, Kristina, 2012. "Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 76-87.
    16. Luz Maria Castro & Fabian Härtl & Santiago Ochoa & Baltazar Calvas & Leonardo Izquierdo & Thomas Knoke, 2018. "Integrated bio-economic models as tools to support land-use decision making: a review of potential and limitations," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 183-211, July.
    17. Zamora-Pereira, Juan Carlos & Hanewinkel, Marc & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2023. "Robust management strategies promoting ecological resilience and economic efficiency of a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest in Southwest Germany under the risk of severe drought," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    18. Aggestam, Filip & Wolfslehner, Bernhard, 2018. "Deconstructing a complex future: Scenario development and implications for the forest-based sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 21-26.
    19. Volkow, Artiom & Droždz, Jolanta, 2016. "Evaluating Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy 2004-2013 Direct Payment Scheme on Economic Sustainability of Agriculture in Lithuania," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 253701, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    20. Montagné-Huck, Claire & Brunette, Marielle, 2018. "Economic analysis of natural forest disturbances: A century of research," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 42-71.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:305:y:2015:i:c:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.