IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v259y2013icp62-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behind the scenes of population viability modeling: Predicting butterfly metapopulation dynamics under climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Radchuk, Viktoriia
  • Johst, Karin
  • Groeneveld, Jürgen
  • Grimm, Volker
  • Schtickzelle, Nicolas

Abstract

Studies explaining the choice of model structure for population viability analysis (PVA) are rare and no such study exists for butterfly species, a focal group for conservation. Here, we describe in detail the development of a model to predict population viability of a glacial relict butterfly species, Boloria eunomia, under climate change. We compared four alternative formulations of an individual-based model, differing in the environmental factors acting on the survival of immature life stages: temperature (only temperature impact), weather (temperature, precipitation, and sunshine), temperature and parasitism, and weather and parasitism. Following pattern-oriented modeling, four observed patterns were used to contrast these models: one qualitative (response of population size to habitat parameters) and three quantitative ones describing population dynamics during eight years (mean and variability of population size, and magnitude of the temporal autocorrelation in yearly population growth rates). The four model formulations were not equally able to depict population dynamics under current environmental conditions; the model including only temperature was selected as the most parsimonious model sufficiently well reproducing the empirical patterns. We used all four model formulations to test a range of climate change scenarios that were characterized by changes in both mean and variability of the weather variables. All models predicted adverse effects of climate change and resulted in the same ranking of mean climate change scenarios. However, models differed in their absolute values of population viability measures, underlining the need to explicitly choose the most appropriate model formulation and avoid arbitrary usage of environmental drivers in a model. We conclude that further applications of pattern-oriented modeling to butterfly and other species are likely to help in identifying the key factors impacting the viability of certain taxa, which, ultimately, will aid and speed up informed management decisions for endangered species under climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Radchuk, Viktoriia & Johst, Karin & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Grimm, Volker & Schtickzelle, Nicolas, 2013. "Behind the scenes of population viability modeling: Predicting butterfly metapopulation dynamics under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 62-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:259:y:2013:i:c:p:62-73
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013001713
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Groeneveld, J. & Alves, L.F. & Bernacci, L.C. & Catharino, E.L.M. & Knogge, C. & Metzger, J.P. & Pütz, S. & Huth, A., 2009. "The impact of fragmentation and density regulation on forest succession in the Atlantic rain forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2450-2459.
    2. Swanack, Todd M. & Grant, William E. & Forstner, Michael R.J., 2009. "Projecting population trends of endangered amphibian species in the face of uncertainty: A pattern-oriented approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 148-159.
    3. Railsback, Steven F. & Johnson, Matthew D., 2011. "Pattern-oriented modeling of bird foraging and pest control in coffee farms," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(18), pages 3305-3319.
    4. Piou, Cyril & Prévost, Etienne, 2012. "A demo-genetic individual-based model for Atlantic salmon populations: Model structure, parameterization and sensitivity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 37-52.
    5. Cormont, Anouk & Jochem, René & Malinowska, Agnieszka & Verboom, Jana & WallisDeVries, Michiel F. & Opdam, Paul, 2012. "Can phenological shifts compensate for adverse effects of climate change on butterfly metapopulation viability?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 72-81.
    6. Sable, Shaye E. & Rose, Kenneth A., 2008. "A comparison of individual-based and matrix projection models for simulating yellow perch population dynamics in Oneida Lake, New York, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 105-121.
    7. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Polhill, J. Gary & Giske, Jarl & Railsback, Steven F., 2010. "The ODD protocol: A review and first update," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2760-2768.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabritius, Henna & Knegt, Henrik de & Ovaskainen, Otso, 2021. "Effects of a mobile disturbance pattern on dynamic patch networks and metapopulation persistence," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
    2. Radchuk, Viktoriia & Oppel, Steffen & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Grimm, Volker & Schtickzelle, Nicolas, 2016. "Simple or complex: Relative impact of data availability and model purpose on the choice of model types for population viability analyses," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 87-95.
    3. Singer, Alexander & Johst, Karin & Banitz, Thomas & Fowler, Mike S. & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Gutiérrez, Alvaro G. & Hartig, Florian & Krug, Rainer M. & Liess, Matthias & Matlack, Glenn & Meyer, Katrin M, 2016. "Community dynamics under environmental change: How can next generation mechanistic models improve projections of species distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 63-74.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanapaux, William & Kiker, Gregory A., 2013. "Development and testing of an object-oriented model for adaptively managing human disturbance of least tern (Sternula antillarum) nesting habitat," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 64-77.
    2. Ascensão, Fernando & Clevenger, Anthony & Santos-Reis, Margarida & Urbano, Paulo & Jackson, Nathan, 2013. "Wildlife–vehicle collision mitigation: Is partial fencing the answer? An agent-based model approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 36-43.
    3. Rougier, Thibaud & Drouineau, Hilaire & Dumoulin, Nicolas & Faure, Thierry & Deffuant, Guillaume & Rochard, Eric & Lambert, Patrick, 2014. "The GR3D model, a tool to explore the Global Repositioning Dynamics of Diadromous fish Distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 31-44.
    4. Ayllón, Daniel & Railsback, Steven F. & Vincenzi, Simone & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Almodóvar, Ana & Grimm, Volker, 2016. "InSTREAM-Gen: Modelling eco-evolutionary dynamics of trout populations under anthropogenic environmental change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 36-53.
    5. Mintram, Kate S. & Brown, A. Ross & Maynard, Samuel K. & Liu, Chun & Parker, Sarah-Jane & Tyler, Charles R. & Thorbek, Pernille, 2018. "Assessing population impacts of toxicant-induced disruption of breeding behaviours using an individual-based model for the three-spined stickleback," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 107-117.
    6. Sánchez-Clavijo, Lina M. & Hearns, Jessica & Quintana-Ascencio, Pedro F., 2016. "Modeling the effect of habitat selection mechanisms on population responses to landscape structure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 99-107.
    7. Jager, Henriette I. & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2018. "The confluences of ideas leading to, and the flow of ideas emerging from, individual-based modeling of riverine fishes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 341-352.
    8. Diouf, Esther Gnilane & Brévault, Thierry & Ndiaye, Saliou & Faye, Emile & Chailleux, Anaïs & Diatta, Paterne & Piou, Cyril, 2022. "An agent-based model to simulate the boosted Sterile Insect Technique for fruit fly management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    9. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Tomback, Diana F. & Lorenz, Teresa & Marceau, Danielle, 2017. "Energetic behavioural-strategy prioritization of Clark’s nutcrackers in whitebark pine communities: An agent-based modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 123-139.
    10. Westervelt, James D. & Sperry, Jinelle H. & Burton, Jennifer L. & Palis, John G., 2013. "Modeling response of frosted flatwoods salamander populations to historic and predicted climate variables," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 18-24.
    11. Goto, Daisuke & Hamel, Martin J. & Hammen, Jeremy J. & Rugg, Matthew L. & Pegg, Mark A. & Forbes, Valery E., 2015. "Spatiotemporal variation in flow-dependent recruitment of long-lived riverine fish: Model development and evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 296(C), pages 79-92.
    12. Cao, Shan & Wang, Jiadao & Li, Dangguo & Chen, Darong, 2013. "Ecological and social modeling for migration and adhesion pattern of a benthic diatom," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 269-278.
    13. Frank, Béatrice M. & Baret, Philippe V., 2013. "Simulating brown trout demogenetics in a river/nursery brook system: The individual-based model DemGenTrout," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 184-202.
    14. Halsey, Samniqueka J. & Cinel, Scott & Wilson, Jared & Bell, Timothy J. & Bowles, Marlin, 2017. "Predicting population viability of a monocarpic perennial dune thistle using individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 363-371.
    15. Baggio, Rafael A. & Araujo, Sabrina B.L. & Ayllón, Daniel & Boeger, Walter A., 2018. "Dams cause genetic homogenization in populations of fish that present homing behavior: Evidence from a demogenetic individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 209-220.
    16. Tardy, Olivia & Lenglos, Christophe & Lai, Sandra & Berteaux, Dominique & Leighton, Patrick A., 2023. "Rabies transmission in the Arctic: An agent-based model reveals the effects of broad-scale movement strategies on contact risk between Arctic foxes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    17. Vimercati, Giovanni & Hui, Cang & Davies, Sarah J. & Measey, G. John, 2017. "Integrating age structured and landscape resistance models to disentangle invasion dynamics of a pond-breeding anuran," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 104-116.
    18. Jagadish, Arundhati & Dwivedi, Puneet & McEntire, Kira D. & Chandar, Mamta, 2019. "Agent-based modeling of “cleaner” cookstove adoption and woodfuel use: An integrative empirical approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Hinker, Jonas & Hemkendreis, Christian & Drewing, Emily & März, Steven & Hidalgo Rodríguez, Diego I. & Myrzik, Johanna M.A., 2017. "A novel conceptual model facilitating the derivation of agent-based models for analyzing socio-technical optimality gaps in the energy domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1219-1230.
    20. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:259:y:2013:i:c:p:62-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.