IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v219y2008i3p400-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty analysis in carbon cycle models of forest ecosystems: Research needs and development of a theoretical framework to estimate error propagation

Author

Listed:
  • Larocque, Guy R.
  • Bhatti, Jagtar S.
  • Boutin, Robert
  • Chertov, Oleg

Abstract

Few process-based models of the carbon (C) cycle of forest ecosystems integrate uncertainty analysis into their predictions. There are two explanations as to why uncertainty estimates in the predictions of these models have seldom been provided. First, as the development of forest ecosystem process-based models has begun only recently, research efforts have focused on theoretical development to improve realism rather than reducing the amplitude of variation of the predictions. Second, there is still little information on uncertainty estimates in parameters and key variables for forest ecosystem models. As process-based models usually contain several complex nonlinear relationships, the Monte Carlo method is most commonly used to facilitate uncertainty analysis. However, its full potential for error propagation analysis in process-based models of the C cycle of forest ecosystems remains to be developed. In this paper, commonly used methods to address uncertainty in C cycle forest ecosystem models are discussed and directions for further research are presented. Realizing the full potential of uncertainty analysis for these model types will require obtaining better estimates of the errors and distributions of key parameters for complex relationships in ecophysiological processes by increasing sampling intensity and testing different sampling designs. As the level of complexity of the type of relationships used in forest ecosystem models varies substantially, the application of uncertainty analysis methods can be further facilitated by developing a model-driven decision support system based on different analytical applications to derive optimum and efficient uncertainty analysis pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Larocque, Guy R. & Bhatti, Jagtar S. & Boutin, Robert & Chertov, Oleg, 2008. "Uncertainty analysis in carbon cycle models of forest ecosystems: Research needs and development of a theoretical framework to estimate error propagation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 400-412.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:3:p:400-412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008003542
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, C.F. & Meng, F.-R. & Bhatti, J.S. & Trofymow, J.A. & Arp, Paul A., 2008. "Modeling forest leaf-litter decomposition and N mineralization in litterbags, placed across Canada: A 5-model comparison," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 342-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larocque, Guy R. & Bhatti, Jagtar & Arsenault, André, 2014. "Integrated modelling software platform development for effective use of ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 195-202.
    2. Larocque, Guy R. & Bhatti, Jagtar & Arsenault, André, 2015. "Integrated modelling software platform development for effective use of ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 318-325.
    3. Arika Ligmann-Zielinska & Daniel B Kramer & Kendra Spence Cheruvelil & Patricia A Soranno, 2014. "Using Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses in Socioecological Agent-Based Models to Improve Their Analytical Performance and Policy Relevance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Ren, Xiaoli & He, Honglin & Zhang, Li & Li, Fan & Liu, Min & Yu, Guirui & Zhang, Junhui, 2018. "Modeling and uncertainty analysis of carbon and water fluxes in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest based on model-data fusion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 379(C), pages 39-53.
    5. Shanin, Vladimir N. & Komarov, Alexander S. & Mikhailov, Alexey V. & Bykhovets, Sergei S., 2011. "Modelling carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forest ecosystems of Central Russia under different climate change scenarios and forest management regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2262-2275.
    6. Turley, Marianne C. & Ford, E. David, 2009. "Definition and calculation of uncertainty in ecological process models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(17), pages 1968-1983.
    7. Paul W. Fischer & Alison C. Cullen & Gregory J. Ettl, 2017. "The Effect of Forest Management Strategy on Carbon Storage and Revenue in Western Washington: A Probabilistic Simulation of Tradeoffs," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 173-192, January.
    8. Zhou, Decheng & Zhao, Shuqing & Liu, Shuguang & Zhang, Liangxia, 2014. "Modeling the effects of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in the Loess Plateau: A case study with Ansai County, Shaanxi province, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 47-54.
    9. Yue, Tian-Xiang & Jorgensen, Sven E. & Larocque, Guy R., 2011. "Progress in global ecological modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2172-2177.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balland, Vincent & Pollacco, Joseph A.P. & Arp, Paul A., 2008. "Modeling soil hydraulic properties for a wide range of soil conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 300-316.
    2. Smith, Amanda C. & Bhatti, Jagtar S. & Chen, Hua & Harmon, Mark E. & Arp, Paul A., 2011. "Modelling above- and below-ground mass loss and N dynamics in wooden dowels (LIDET) placed across North and Central America biomes at the decadal time scale," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2276-2290.
    3. Smyth, C.E. & Kurz, W.A. & Trofymow, J.A., 2011. "Including the effects of water stress on decomposition in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1080-1091.
    4. Ogbazghi, Z.M. & Tesfamariam, E.H. & Annandale, J.G., 2016. "Modelling N mineralisation from sludge-amended soils across agro-ecological zones: A case study from South Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 322(C), pages 19-30.
    5. Zhang, Chengfu & Jamieson, Rob C. & Meng, Fan-Rui & Gordon, Robert J. & Bourque, Charles P.-A., 2013. "Simulation of monthly dissolved organic carbon concentrations in small forested watersheds," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 205-213.
    6. Li, Xia & Cui, Baoshan & Yang, Qichun & Lan, Yan & Wang, Tingting & Han, Zhen, 2013. "Effects of plant species on macrophyte decomposition under three nutrient conditions in a eutrophic shallow lake, North China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 121-128.
    7. Murphy, Paul N.C. & Ogilvie, Jae & Meng, Fan-Rui & White, Barry & Bhatti, Jagtar S. & Arp, Paul A., 2011. "Modelling and mapping topographic variations in forest soils at high resolution: A case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2314-2332.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:3:p:400-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.