IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v215y2008i4p314-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structuring pelagic trophic networks from the biomass size spectra

Author

Listed:
  • Cózar, Andrés
  • García, Carlos M.
  • Gálvez, José A.
  • Echevarría, Fidel

Abstract

The selection and establishment of the structure (number and compartments, aggregation criteria, and trophic links) of the food webs is a critical task in trophic modelling. The present work proposes a systematic method to structure trophic networks in pelagic food webs. The biomass-size spectrum (BSS) is a well-established approach to analyze the structure of pelagic communities, and the body size is especially related to the ecological role of the organisms in the pelagic environment. To structure food webs, this work uses detailed arrangements of the community in size classes with increasing widths (like Sheldon-type BSS) as first aggregation criteria, and BSS theory as a framework to integrate the available knowledge about feeding selectivity in order to obtain a method to identify the trophic links between compartments. Diet composition matrices were estimated through the combination of a probability of encounter for each food type and a specific probability of ingestion related to the food size selectivity and other food quality characteristics (e.g., morphology and nutritional quality). The feasibility of this approach has been illustrated through data of size-structured communities extracted from the literature including different planktonic predator guilds (nanoflagellates, cladoceran-dominated zooplankton and copepod-dominated zooplankton) in a high mountain lake (La Caldera, Spain), two subtropical wetland lakes (meso-oligotrophic Laguna Galarza and eutrophic Laguna Iberá, Argentina) and a marine microcosm (Alborán Sea, Mediterranean). The identification of “who eats whom” and “by how much” also allows for more accurate analyses of the trophic control in the BSS. Extensive analyses of the balance between top-down and bottom-up controls were developed for the feeding interactions of the study cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Cózar, Andrés & García, Carlos M. & Gálvez, José A. & Echevarría, Fidel, 2008. "Structuring pelagic trophic networks from the biomass size spectra," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(4), pages 314-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:215:y:2008:i:4:p:314-324
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008001245
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fath, Brian D., 2007. "Structural food web regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 391-394.
    2. Fath, Brian D. & Scharler, Ursula M. & Ulanowicz, Robert E. & Hannon, Bruce, 2007. "Ecological network analysis: network construction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 49-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phillips, Jonathan D., 2011. "Predicting modes of spatial change from state-and-transition models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 475-484.
    2. Chen, G.Q. & Chen, Z.M., 2011. "Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: Ecological input–output modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2362-2376.
    3. Borrett, Stuart R. & Sheble, Laura & Moody, James & Anway, Evan C., 2018. "Bibliometric review of ecological network analysis: 2010–2016," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 63-82.
    4. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Coupling of carbon and energy flows in cities: A meta-analysis and nexus modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 774-783.
    5. Li, Lianwei & Li, Wendy & Zou, Quan & Ma, Zhanshan (Sam), 2020. "Network analysis of the hot spring microbiome sketches out possible niche differentiations among ecological guilds," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    6. Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin & Feng, Kuishuang & Liu, Zhu & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2018. "Interregional carbon flows of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 342-352.
    7. Kim, Daehyun & Phillips, Jonathan D., 2013. "Predicting the structure and mode of vegetation dynamics: An application of graph theory to state-and-transition models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 64-73.
    8. Lu, Jingzhao & Lu, Hongwei & Wang, Weipeng & Feng, SanSan & Lei, Kaiwen, 2021. "Ecological risk assessment of heavy metal contamination of mining area soil based on land type changes: An information network environ analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    9. Campbell, Elliott T. & Tilley, David R., 2016. "Relationships between renewable emergy storage or flow and biodiversity: A modeling investigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 134-148.
    10. Salas, Andria K. & Borrett, Stuart R., 2011. "Evidence for the dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1192-1204.
    11. Lloret-Climent, Miguel & Amorós-Jiménez, Rocco & González-Franco, Lucía & Nescolarde-Selva, Josué-Antonio, 2014. "Coverage and invariance for the biological control of pests in mediterranean greenhouses," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 37-44.
    12. Mukherjee, Joyita & Scharler, Ursula M. & Fath, Brian D. & Ray, Santanu, 2015. "Measuring sensitivity of robustness and network indices for an estuarine food web model under perturbations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 160-173.
    13. Szymczak, Leonardo Silvestri & Carvalho, Paulo César de Faccio & Lurette, Amandine & Moraes, Anibal de & Nunes, Pedro Arthur de Albuquerque & Martins, Amanda Posselt & Moulin, Charles-Henri, 2020. "System diversification and grazing management as resilience-enhancing agricultural practices: The case of crop-livestock integration," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Guo, Ruipeng & Zhu, Xiaojie & Chen, Bin & Yue, Yunli, 2016. "Ecological network analysis of the virtual water network within China’s electric power system during 2007–2012," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 110-121.
    15. Yu Han & Chaoyue Yu & Zhe Feng & Hanchu Du & Caisi Huang & Kening Wu, 2021. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern Based on Spatial Syntax Classification—Taking Ningbo, China, as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Baird, Dan & Fath, Brian D. & Ulanowicz, Robert E. & Asmus, Harald & Asmus, Ragnhild, 2009. "On the consequences of aggregation and balancing of networks on system properties derived from ecological network analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3465-3471.
    17. Chatterjee, Abheek & Layton, Astrid, 2020. "Mimicking nature for resilient resource and infrastructure network design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Min, Yong & Jin, Xiaogang & Chang, Jie & Peng, Changhui & Gu, Baojing & Ge, Ying & Zhong, Yang, 2011. "Weak indirect effects inherent to nitrogen biogeochemical cycling within anthropogenic ecosystems: A network environ analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3277-3284.
    19. Guarino, Raffaele & Corsi, Giulio & Muñoz-Ulecia, Enrique, 2023. "How sustainable development goals have transformed our world? Evolution of the ecological networks of the Italian economy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    20. Johnson, Galen A. & Niquil, Nathalie & Asmus, Harald & Bacher, Cédric & Asmus, Ragnhild & Baird, Daniel, 2009. "The effects of aggregation on the performance of the inverse method and indicators of network analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3448-3464.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:215:y:2008:i:4:p:314-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.