IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v250y2025ics0165176525000953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political corruption and local mutual fund performance

Author

Listed:
  • Hwang, Hyoseok David
  • Nam, Hocheol

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of political corruption on the performance of local mutual funds. Using comprehensive U.S. mutual fund and state corruption data from 2003 to 2019, we find that local corruption is positively associated with fund performance. Mutual funds in the most corrupt states outperform those in the least corrupt states by 24 basis points annually, with results remaining consistent across various performance metrics. This counterintuitive finding suggests that fund managers in corrupt environments might develop superior information networks and local connections that provide them with valuable investment insights. The results indicate that institutional investors like mutual funds might be better positioned than other market participants to navigate and potentially benefit from corrupt environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hwang, Hyoseok David & Nam, Hocheol, 2025. "Political corruption and local mutual fund performance," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:250:y:2025:i:c:s0165176525000953
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525000953
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Political corruption; Mutual Fund; Fund Performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:250:y:2025:i:c:s0165176525000953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.