IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v158y2024ics0190740924000276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of evidence-based programmes in family support across Europe: A comparative survey study

Author

Listed:
  • Bernedo, Isabel M.
  • Almeida, Ana
  • Byrne, Sonia
  • González-Pasarín, Lucía
  • Pećnik, Ninoslava
  • Cruz, Orlanda
  • Uka, Ana
  • Skučienė, Daiva
  • Šumskaitė, Lina

Abstract

The importance of using evidence-based programmes to ensure children’s rights and families’ wellbeing is increasingly recognized in Europe. However, there are few and partial attempts to gain insight into the scope of prevention and promotion programmes currently implemented in child and family services across Europe, often located outside the formal peer-reviewed channels. The objectives of this study are empirically examining the diversity of family support programmes delivered and the extent to which they meet evidence-based standards for programme formulation and provide a picture of the typologies according to programme descriptors, operational aspects and implementation components. The Family Support Programmes' Survey was used to identify existing programmes addressing family support in participating countries. The sample includes 193 support programmes from 17 European countries, members of the European Family Support Network corresponding to three regions of Europe (Northern, Southern and Central-Eastern). The comparative survey was conducted using the Data Collection Sheet to gather information about program characteristics. Descriptive and cluster analyses were carried out. Results show that a large number of programmes fulfil evidence-based standards for programme formulation, such as clearly defined theoretical framework, manualization, and methodology components. In addition, three cluster profiles of programme formulation components were determined corresponding to the three European regions. Implications for research and practice on the development of family support programmes according to evidence-based standards for programme formulation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernedo, Isabel M. & Almeida, Ana & Byrne, Sonia & González-Pasarín, Lucía & Pećnik, Ninoslava & Cruz, Orlanda & Uka, Ana & Skučienė, Daiva & Šumskaitė, Lina, 2024. "The use of evidence-based programmes in family support across Europe: A comparative survey study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:158:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924000276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924000276
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Acquah & Olivier Thévenon, 2020. "Delivering evidence based services for all vulnerable families," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 243, OECD Publishing.
    2. Mary Daly & Zlata Bruckhauf & Jasmina Byrne & Ninoslava Pecnik & Maureen Samms-Vaughan & Rachel Bray & Alice Margaria & UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti, 2015. "Family and Parenting Support: Policy and Provision in a Global Context," Papers innins770, Innocenti Insights.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams, Annie & Reed, Hayley & Rees, Gwyther & Segrott, Jeremy, 2018. "Improving relationship–based practice, practitioner confidence and family engagement skills through restorative approach training," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 170-177.
    2. Mona Sandbæk, 2017. "European Policies to Promote Children’s Rights and Combat Child Poverty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Roche, Steven, 2020. "Conceptualising children’s life histories and reasons for entry into residential care in the Philippines: Social contexts, instabilities and safeguarding," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Luh Putu Maitra Agastya, Ni & Wise, Sarah & Kertesz, Margaret & Kusumaningrum, Santi, 2024. "Transformation of child welfare Institutions in Bandung, West Java: A case of deinstitutionalization in Indonesia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Steven Roche & Catherine Flynn, 2021. "Local child protection in the Philippines: A case study of actors, processes and key risks for children," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 367-383, September.
    6. Roche, Steven & Otarra, Carmela & Fell, Imogen & Belle Torres, Christine & Rees, Sydney, 2023. "Online sexual exploitation of children in the Philippines: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. McGregor, Caroline & Canavan, John & Gabhainn, Saoirse Nic, 2020. "A critical consideration of the relationship between professional and public understandings of Family Support: Towards greater public awareness and discursive coherence in concept and delivery," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Caroline McGregor & Carmel Devaney, 2020. "A Framework to Inform Protective Support and Supportive Protection in Child Protection and Welfare Practice and Supervision," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Cohen, Franziska & Trauernicht, Mareike & Francot, Ryanne & Broekhuizen, Martine & Anders, Yvonne, 2020. "Professional competencies of practitioners in family and parenting support programmes. A German and Dutch case study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Sachin De Stone & Franziska Meinck & Lorraine Sherr & Lucie Cluver & Jenny Doubt & Frederick Mark Orkin & Caroline Kuo & Amogh Sharma & Imca Hensels & Sarah Skeen & Alice Redfern & Mark Tomlinson & UN, 2016. "Factors Associated with Good and Harsh Parenting of Pre-Adolescents and Adolescents in Southern Africa," Papers inwopa870, Innocenti Working Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:158:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924000276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.