IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v157y2024ics0190740923005893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spells of subsidized childcare arrangements and subsidy non-use

Author

Listed:
  • Aranda, Rodrigo
  • Lamprecht, Caroline
  • Ribar, David C.

Abstract

Programs supported by the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) help families with low incomes and in vulnerable circumstances obtain high-quality childcare at a reduced cost. Stable childcare arrangements are an important aspect of quality, but stability depends on families maintaining eligibility, using their subsidies, and staying with a provider. This study uses records from Georgia’s CCDF-supported Childcare and Parent Services program to investigate children’s spells of receiving subsidized childcare from the same provider and of holding subsidies but not using them. It finds that subsidized care arrangements are relatively stable but frequently interrupted by non-use. Only 37% of children are ever observed to change providers, and the median length of spells of continuously receiving care from the same provider is 16 weeks. However, 17% of subsidies go unused each week, and 66% of children have spells of not using their subsidies. The median length of spells of having an available subsidy but not using it is three weeks. Many spells of care arrangements end on annual eligibility renewal dates. Children in smaller settings, before-/after-school care, Quality-Rated care, and settings close to home have more stable care arrangements than other children.

Suggested Citation

  • Aranda, Rodrigo & Lamprecht, Caroline & Ribar, David C., 2024. "Spells of subsidized childcare arrangements and subsidy non-use," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:157:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005893
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923005893
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:157:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.