IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Inference in generalized linear regression models with a censored covariate

Listed author(s):
  • Tsimikas, John V.
  • Bantis, Leonidas E.
  • Georgiou, Stelios D.
Registered author(s):

    The problem of estimating the parameters in a generalized linear model when a covariate is subject to censoring is studied. A new method based on an estimating function approach is proposed. The method does not assume a parametric form for the distribution of the response given the regressors and is computationally simple. In the linear regression case, the proposed approach implies the use of mean imputation of the censored regressor. The use of flexible parametric models for the distribution of the covariate is employed. When survival time is considered as the covariate subject to censoring, the use of the generalized gamma distribution is explored, since it is considered as a platform distribution covering a wide variety of hazard rate shapes. The method can be further robustified by considering models of nonparametric nature typically used in survival analysis such as the logspline for the censored covariate. For models involving additional, fully observed, covariates the use of a generalized gamma accelerated failure time regression model is explored. In this setting, no parametric family assumption for the extra covariates is needed. The proposed approach is broader than likelihood based multiple imputation techniques. Moreover, even in cases with a known parametric form for the response distribution, the method can be considered a feasible alternative to likelihood based estimation. Simulation studies are conducted for continuous, binary and count data to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and to compare the estimates to standard ones. An application using a well known data set of a randomized placebo controlled trial of the drug D-penicillamine (DPCA) for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) conducted at the Mayo Clinic is presented. Possible extensions of the method regarding the robustness as well as the type of censoring are also discussed.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.

    Volume (Year): 56 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 6 ()
    Pages: 1854-1868

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:6:p:1854-1868
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.11.010
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Yuan, Ke-Hai & Jennrich, Robert I., 1998. "Asymptotics of Estimating Equations under Natural Conditions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 245-260, May.
    2. Roberto Rigobon & Thomas M. Stoker, 2007. "Estimation With Censored Regressors: Basic Issues," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1441-1467, November.
    3. C.-Y. Wang & Margaret Sullivan Pepe, 2000. "Expected estimating equations to accommodate covariate measurement error," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(3), pages 509-524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:6:p:1854-1868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.