IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i8p3139-3144.html

Diagnostics for regression dependence in tables re-ordered by the dominant correspondence analysis solution

Author

Listed:
  • Warrens, Matthijs J.
  • Heiser, Willem J.

Abstract

Correspondence analysis is an exploratory technique for analyzing the interaction in a contingency table. Tables with meaningful orders of the rows and columns may be analyzed using a model-based correspondence analysis that incorporates order constraints. However, if there exists a permutation of the rows and columns of the contingency table so that the rows are regression dependent on the columns and, vice versa, the columns are regression dependent on the rows, then both implied orders are reflected in the first dimension of the unconstrained correspondence analysis [Schriever, B.F., 1983. Scaling of order dependent categorical variables with correspondence analysis. International Statistical Review 51, 225-238]. Thus, using unconstrained correspondence analysis, we may still find that the data fit an ordinal stochastic model. Fit measures are formulated that may be used to verify whether the re-ordered contingency table is regression dependent in either the rows or columns. Using several data examples, it is shown that the fit indices may complement the usual geometric interpretation of the unconstrained correspondence analysis solution in low-dimensional space.

Suggested Citation

  • Warrens, Matthijs J. & Heiser, Willem J., 2009. "Diagnostics for regression dependence in tables re-ordered by the dominant correspondence analysis solution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3139-3144, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:8:p:3139-3144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00384-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Kimeldorf & Allan Sampson, 1989. "A framework for positive dependence," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 41(1), pages 31-45, March.
    2. Anton Formann, 1988. "Latent class models for nonmonotone dichotomous items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(1), pages 45-62, March.
    3. Michael Greenacre, 2008. "Correspondence analysis of raw data," Economics Working Papers 1112, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jul 2009.
    4. Cohen, Arthur & Kolassa, John & Sackrowitz, H.B., 2006. "A new test for stochastic order of k[greater-or-equal, slanted]3 ordered multinomial populations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(10), pages 1017-1024, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blasius, J. & Greenacre, M. & Groenen, P.J.F. & van de Velden, M., 2009. "Special issue on correspondence analysis and related methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3103-3106, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrizio Durante & Roberto Ghiselli-Ricci, 2012. "Supermigrative copulas and positive dependence," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 96(3), pages 327-342, July.
    2. Eric Beh & Luigi D’Ambra, 2009. "Some Interpretative Tools for Non-Symmetrical Correspondence Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 26(1), pages 55-76, April.
    3. Michael Greenacre, 2011. "A simple permutation test for clusteredness," Economics Working Papers 1271, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. David Bholat & Stephen Hans & Pedro Santos & Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey, 2015. "Text mining for central banks," Handbooks, Centre for Central Banking Studies, Bank of England, number 33, April.
    5. Michael Greenacre, 2012. "Fuzzy coding in constrained ordinations," Economics Working Papers 1325, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    6. Alfonso Gambardella & Walter Garcia Fontes, 1996. "European research funding and regional technological capabilities: Network composition analysis," Economics Working Papers 174, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    7. Paul Green & Jonathan Kim & Frank Carmone, 1990. "A preliminary study of optimal variable weighting in k-means clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 7(2), pages 271-285, September.
    8. J. Christopher Westland, 2015. "Economics of eBay’s buyer protection plan," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Malcolm Dow & Peter Willett & Roderick McDonald & Belver Griffith & Michael Greenacre & Peter Bryant & Daniel Wartenberg & Ove Frank, 1987. "Book reviews," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 4(2), pages 245-278, September.
    10. Vartan Choulakian, 1988. "Exploratory analysis of contingency tables by loglinear formulation and generalizations of correspondence analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 235-250, June.
    11. Roger Nelsen & Manuel Úbeda-Flores, 2012. "Directional dependence in multivariate distributions," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(3), pages 677-685, June.
    12. Bassan, Bruno & Spizzichino, Fabio, 2005. "Relations among univariate aging, bivariate aging and dependence for exchangeable lifetimes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 313-339, April.
    13. W. Krzanowski & Gregory Cermak & Jan Leeuw & Fionn Murtagh & Peter Bryant & Bernard Monjardet & Chikio Hayashi, 1985. "Book reviews," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 277-299, December.
    14. François Bavaud, 2011. "On the Schoenberg Transformations in Data Analysis: Theory and Illustrations," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 28(3), pages 297-314, October.
    15. Maura Vásquez & Guillermo Ramírez & Alberto Camardiel & Tomás Aluja, 2008. "A Biplot graphical tool to model the relationships between two sets of variables," Economía, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales (IIES). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida, Venezuela, vol. 33(25), pages 117-130, january-j.
    16. Jurlin, Kresimir & Malekovic, Sanja & Puljiz, Jaksa & Cziraky, Dario & Polic, Mario, 2002. "Covariance structure analysis of regional development data: an application to municipality development assessment," ERSA conference papers ersa02p469, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Robert Boik, 1996. "An efficient algorithm for joint correspondence analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 255-269, June.
    18. Jos Berge, 1995. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 313-315, June.
    19. Evert Meijers, 2005. "High-level consumer services in polycentric urban regions - hospital care and higher education between duplication and complementarity," ERSA conference papers ersa05p208, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Laurent Lesnard & Thibaut Saint Pol, 2009. "Patterns of Workweek Schedules in France," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 171-176, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:8:p:3139-3144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.