IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Fisher information based progressive censoring plans

Listed author(s):
  • Balakrishnan, N.
  • Burkschat, Marco
  • Cramer, Erhard
  • Hofmann, Glenn
Registered author(s):

    In life tests, the progressive Type-II censoring methodology allows for the possibility of censoring a number of units each time a failure is observed. This results in a large number of possible censoring plans, depending on the number of both censoring times and censoring numbers. Employing maximum Fisher Information as an optimality criterion, optimal plans for a variety of lifetime distributions are determined numerically. In particular, exact optimal plans are established for some important lifetime distributions. While for some distributions, Fisher information is invariant with respect to the censoring plan, results for other distributions lead us to hypothesize that the optimal scheme is in fact always a one-step method, restricting censoring to exactly one point in time. Depending on the distribution and its parameters, this optimal point of censoring can be located at the end (right censoring) or after a certain proportion of observations. A variety of distributions is categorized accordingly. If the optimal plan is a one-step censoring scheme, the optimal proportion is determined. Moreover, the Fisher information as well as the expected time till the completion of the experiment for the optimal one-step censoring plan are compared with the respective quantities of both right censoring and simple random sampling.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.

    Volume (Year): 53 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 2 (December)
    Pages: 366-380

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2008:i:2:p:366-380
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Zheng, Gang & Gastwirth, Joseph L., 2001. "On the Fisher information in randomly censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 421-426, May.
    2. Hofmann, Glenn & Balakrishnan, N. & Ahmadi, Jafar, 2005. "Characterization of hazard function factorization by Fisher information in minima and upper record values," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 51-57, April.
    3. An, Mark Yuying, 1998. "Logconcavity versus Logconvexity: A Complete Characterization," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 350-369, June.
    4. Burkschat, M. & Cramer, E. & Kamps, U., 2006. "On optimal schemes in progressive censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(10), pages 1032-1036, May.
    5. Gertsbakh, Ilya & Kagan, Abram, 1999. "Characterization of the Weibull distribution by properties of the Fisher information under type-I censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 99-105, March.
    6. Balakrishnan, N. & Cramer, E. & Kamps, U., 2001. "Bounds for means and variances of progressive type II censored order statistics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 301-315, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2008:i:2:p:366-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.