IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v52y2008i12p5186-5201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Hubert, M.
  • Vandervieren, E.

Abstract

The boxplot is a very popular graphical tool for visualizing the distribution of continuous unimodal data. It shows information about the location, spread, skewness as well as the tails of the data. However, when the data are skewed, usually many points exceed the whiskers and are often erroneously declared as outliers. An adjustment of the boxplot is presented that includes a robust measure of skewness in the determination of the whiskers. This results in a more accurate representation of the data and of possible outliers. Consequently, this adjusted boxplot can also be used as a fast and automatic outlier detection tool without making any parametric assumption about the distribution of the bulk of the data. Several examples and simulation results show the advantages of this new procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Hubert, M. & Vandervieren, E., 2008. "An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5186-5201, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:12:p:5186-5201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(07)00443-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A.C. Kimber, 1990. "Exploratory Data Analysis for Possibly Censored Data from Skewed Distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 39(1), pages 21-30, March.
    2. Carling, Kenneth, 2000. "Resistant outlier rules and the non-Gaussian case," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 249-258, May.
    3. Brys, Guy & Hubert, Mia & Struyf, Anja, 2006. "Robust measures of tail weight," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 733-759, February.
    4. Schwertman, Neil C. & Owens, Margaret Ann & Adnan, Robiah, 2004. "A simple more general boxplot method for identifying outliers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 165-174, August.
    5. Vandewalle, B. & Beirlant, J. & Christmann, A. & Hubert, M., 2007. "A robust estimator for the tail index of Pareto-type distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6252-6268, August.
    6. Schwertman, Neil C. & de Silva, Rapti, 2007. "Identifying outliers with sequential fences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3800-3810, May.
    7. J. J. A. Moors & R. Th. A. Wagemakers & V. M. J. Coenen & R. M. J. Heuts & M. J. B. T. Janssens, 1996. "Characterizing systems of distributions by quantile measures," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 50(3), pages 417-430, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guy Brys & Mia Hubert & Anja Struyf, 2008. "Goodness-of-fit tests based on a robust measure of skewness," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 429-442, July.
    2. Schwertman, Neil C. & de Silva, Rapti, 2007. "Identifying outliers with sequential fences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3800-3810, May.
    3. Schwertman, Neil C. & Owens, Margaret Ann & Adnan, Robiah, 2004. "A simple more general boxplot method for identifying outliers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 165-174, August.
    4. Igor Fedotenkov, 2020. "A Review of More than One Hundred Pareto-Tail Index Estimators," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 80(3), pages 245-299.
    5. Dierckx, Goedele & Goegebeur, Yuri & Guillou, Armelle, 2013. "An asymptotically unbiased minimum density power divergence estimator for the Pareto-tail index," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 70-86.
    6. Shengdi Chen & Qingwen Xue & Xiaochen Zhao & Yingying Xing & Jian John Lu, 2021. "Risky Driving Behavior Recognition Based on Vehicle Trajectory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Alexander, Carol & Cordeiro, Gauss M. & Ortega, Edwin M.M. & Sarabia, José María, 2012. "Generalized beta-generated distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1880-1897.
    8. Nawin Raj & Zahra Gharineiat, 2021. "Evaluation of Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines and Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Mean Sea Level Trend around Northern Australian Coastlines," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Gareth W. Peters & Matteo Malavasi & Georgy Sofronov & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Stefan Truck & Jiwook Jang, 2022. "Cyber Loss Model Risk Translates to Premium Mispricing and Risk Sensitivity," Papers 2202.10588, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    10. Ordás Criado, C. & Grether, J.-M., 2011. "Convergence in per capita CO2 emissions: A robust distributional approach," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 637-665, September.
    11. Lu Chen & Luca Sartore & Habtamu Benecha & Valbona Bejleri & Balgobin Nandram, 2022. "Smoothing County-Level Sampling Variances to Improve Small Area Models’ Outputs," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Fabio Galeotti & Daniel John Zizzo, 2015. "Competence versus Honesty: What Do Voters Care About?," Working Papers halshs-01180812, HAL.
    13. M. Ivette Gomes & Armelle Guillou, 2015. "Extreme Value Theory and Statistics of Univariate Extremes: A Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 263-292, August.
    14. Brandi, Giuseppe & Di Matteo, T., 2022. "Multiscaling and rough volatility: An empirical investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Fabio Galeotti & Daniel John Zizzo, 2014. "Competence versus Trustworthiness: What Do Voters Care About?," Post-Print halshs-02467510, HAL.
    16. Carling, Kenneth, 1998. "Resistant outlier rules and the non-Gaussian case," Working Paper Series 2001:7, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    17. Christopher C. Hadlock & J. Eric Bickel, 2017. "Johnson Quantile-Parameterized Distributions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 35-64, March.
    18. Frank Critchley & M. C. Jones, 2008. "Asymmetry and Gradient Asymmetry Functions: Density‐Based Skewness and Kurtosis," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 35(3), pages 415-437, September.
    19. Moors, J.J.A. & Strijbosch, L.W.G. & van Groenendaal, W.J.H., 2002. "Estimating Mean and Variance Through Quantiles : An Experimental Comparison of Different Methods," Discussion Paper 2002-67, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. Merton S. Krause, 2018. "The scientific study of the qualities of individual human lives, rather than of their average quantities in aggregations of lives," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1315-1329, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:12:p:5186-5201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.