IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v51y2006i2p1075-1088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blocking response surface designs

Author

Listed:
  • Goos, P.
  • Donev, A.N.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Goos, P. & Donev, A.N., 2006. "Blocking response surface designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 1075-1088, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:2:p:1075-1088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(05)00295-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goos, Peter & Vandebroek, Martina, 2001. "-optimal response surface designs in the presence of random block effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 433-453, October.
    2. Trinca, Luzia A. & Gilmour, Steven G., 2000. "An algorithm for arranging response surface designs in small blocks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 25-43, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eugene C. Ukaegbu & Polycarp E. Chigbu, 2017. "Evaluation of Orthogonally Blocked Central Composite Designs with Partial Replications," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 112-141, May.
    2. Nha Vo-Thanh & Peter Goos & Eric D. Schoen, 2020. "Integer programming approaches to find row–column arrangements of two-level orthogonal experimental designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 780-796, July.
    3. Loeza-Serrano, S. & Donev, A.N., 2014. "Construction of experimental designs for estimating variance components," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1168-1177.
    4. Georgiou, Stelios D. & Stylianou, Stella & Aggarwal, Manohar, 2014. "A class of composite designs for response surface methodology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1124-1133.
    5. Peter Goos & Alexander Donev, 2007. "$$\mathcal{D}$$ -optimal Minimum Support Mixture Designs in Blocks," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 53-68, February.
    6. ARNOUTS, Heidi & GOOS, Peter, 2009. "Design and analysis of industrial strip-plot experiments," Working Papers 2009007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    7. Belmiro P. M. Duarte, 2023. "Exact Optimal Designs of Experiments for Factorial Models via Mixed-Integer Semidefinite Programming," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Rodney N. Edmondson, 2020. "Multi-level Block Designs for Comparative Experiments," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 500-522, December.
    9. Peter Goos, 2006. "Optimal versus orthogonal and equivalent‐estimation design of blocked and split‐plot experiments," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 60(3), pages 361-378, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. GOOS, Peter & VERMEULEN, Bart & VANDEBROEK, Martina, 2008. "D-optimal conjoint choice designs with no-choice options for a nested logit model," Working Papers 2008020, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. Arnouts, Heidi & Goos, Peter, 2010. "Update formulas for split-plot and block designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3381-3391, December.
    3. Payne, Roger W., 2003. "General balance, large data sets and extensions to unbalanced treatment structures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 297-304, October.
    4. Kessels, Roselinde & Goos, Peter & Vandebroek, Martina, 2008. "Optimal designs for conjoint experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2369-2387, January.
    5. Palhazi Cuervo, Daniel & Goos, Peter & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2017. "An algorithmic framework for generating optimal two-stratum experimental designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 224-249.
    6. Goos, Peter & Vandebroek, Martina, 2001. "-optimal response surface designs in the presence of random block effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 433-453, October.
    7. Rodney N. Edmondson, 2020. "Multi-level Block Designs for Comparative Experiments," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 500-522, December.
    8. Georgiou, Stelios D. & Stylianou, Stella & Aggarwal, Manohar, 2014. "A class of composite designs for response surface methodology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1124-1133.
    9. Das, Rabindra Nath & Kim, Jinseog & Park, Jeong-Soo, 2015. "Robust D-optimal designs under correlated error, applicable invariantly for some lifetime distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 92-100.
    10. Tack, Lieven & Vandebroek, Martina, 2004. "Trend-resistant and cost-efficient cross-over designs for mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 721-746, July.
    11. Graßhoff, Ulrike & Schwabe, Rainer, 2003. "On the analysis of paired observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 7-12, October.
    12. Großmann, Heiko & Gilmour, Steven G., 2023. "Partially orthogonal blocked three-level response surface designs," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 138-154.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:51:y:2006:i:2:p:1075-1088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.