IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v199y2025ip3s0960077925008094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective utility-driven spatial segregation and its impact on cooperation evolution: A cultural weight-dependent perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jinjin
  • Sun, Jingjing
  • Chen, Yuyou

Abstract

How cooperation evolves in culturally diverse populations remains a fundamental question. Individual differences in concern for others’ welfare can shape social interactions, yet their role in driving large-scale social patterns is not fully understood. Here, we propose a spatial evolutionary game model where individuals possess an evolvable ”cultural weight” that dictates how they value their own versus their neighbors’ payoffs. We demonstrate that this utility-evaluation mechanism spontaneously drives significant spatial segregation, where like-minded individuals cluster together. This self-organized structure, in turn, powerfully influences cooperation through a ”boundary effect”: individuals at the interfaces of different cultural clusters exhibit significantly lower cooperation rates than those in homogeneous group interiors. Our findings reveal that subjective utility evaluation based on cultural differences is a key driver of social pattern formation, highlighting a complex feedback loop between individual culture, spatial structure, and the evolution of cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jinjin & Sun, Jingjing & Chen, Yuyou, 2025. "Effective utility-driven spatial segregation and its impact on cooperation evolution: A cultural weight-dependent perspective," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:199:y:2025:i:p3:s0960077925008094
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925008094
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:199:y:2025:i:p3:s0960077925008094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.