IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v101y2017icp100-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leadership by example promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhen
  • Chen, Tong
  • Wang, Yongjie

Abstract

Profit-driven strategies are not always adopted in human society. Reputation, which is often treated as indirect reciprocity, is an important factor to promote cooperation. In this paper, we propose a new kind of reputation mechanism by introducing leadership by example from a complex network perspective. The degree of each node is influenced by reputation value. Leadership by example with higher reputation and greater scope of influence, which could not be ignored, are special group in social network, especially in China. Numerical simulation results are indicated that the evolutionary curves of cooperation are presented an inverted U-shape as the increase of the scope of influence of players. In addition, the relationship are discussed among initial fraction of leadership by example, synergy factors, maximal scope of influence. Whats more, the optimal initial fraction of leadership by example is studied in different conditions. Our work may be beneficial to address the cooperation dilemmas in public goods game (PGG).

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhen & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Leadership by example promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 100-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:100-105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2017.05.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077917302229
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.05.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guth, Werner & Levati, M. Vittoria & Sutter, Matthias & van der Heijden, Eline, 2007. "Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(5-6), pages 1023-1042, June.
    2. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    3. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2016. "How the expanded crowd-funding mechanism of some southern rural areas in China affects cooperative behaviors in threshold public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 649-655.
    4. Zhuang, Qian & Wang, Dong & Fan, Ying & Di, Zengru, 2012. "Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous population with influential individuals," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(4), pages 1735-1741.
    5. Karthik Panchanathan & Robert Boyd, 2004. "Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7016), pages 499-502, November.
    6. Rand, David Gertler & Dreber, Anna & Fudenberg, Drew & Ellingson, Tore & Nowak, Martin A., 2009. "Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation," Scholarly Articles 3804483, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    7. Wu, Te & Fu, Feng & Dou, Puxuan & Wang, Long, 2014. "Social influence promotes cooperation in the public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 86-93.
    8. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6685), pages 573-577, June.
    9. Bram Cadsby, C. & Maynes, Elizabeth, 1998. "Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 603-620, March.
    10. M.A. Nowak & K. Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity," Working Papers ir98040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    11. repec:hhs:iuiwop:487 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Wang, Yongjie & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao & Si, Guangrun, 2017. "Emotional decisions in structured populations for the evolution of public cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 475-481.
    13. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, December.
    14. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    15. M. Droz & J. Szwabiński & G. Szabó, 2009. "Motion of influential players can support cooperation in Prisoner’s Dilemma," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 579-585, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Jiaqin & Fan, Ruguo & Luo, Ming & Zhang, Yingqing & Dong, Lili, 2018. "The evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with dynamic relationship-based preferential learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 598-611.
    2. Yihang Zhao & Jing Xiong & De Hu, 2023. "Reputation, Network, and Performance: Exploring the Diffusion Mechanism of Local Governments’ Behavior during Inter-Governmental Environmental Cooperation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Zhang, Mingzhen & Yang, Naiding & Zhu, Xianglin & Wang, Yan, 2022. "The evolution of cooperation in public goods games on the scale-free community network under multiple strategy-updating rules," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    4. Bahbouhi, Jalal Eddine & Moussa, Najem, 2019. "A graph-based model for public goods with leaderships," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 53-61.
    5. Chica, Manuel & Hernández, Juan M. & Santos, Francisco C., 2022. "Cooperation dynamics under pandemic risks and heterogeneous economic interdependence," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Yang, Ran & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao, 2018. "The impact of lotteries on cooperation in the public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 925-934.
    7. Zhenghong Wu & Huan Huang & Qinghu Liao, 2021. "The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    9. Chica, Manuel & Santos, Francisco C., 2023. "Seeding leading cooperators and institutions in networked climate dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    2. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.
    3. Wang, Lu & Ye, Shun-Qiang & Cheong, Kang Hao & Bao, Wei & Xie, Neng-gang, 2018. "The role of emotions in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with voluntary participation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1396-1407.
    4. Xie, Kai & Liu, Xingwen & Wang, Huazhang & Jiang, Yulian, 2023. "Multi-heterogeneity public goods evolutionary game on lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Juan Wang & Wenwen Lu & Lina Liu & Li Li & Chengyi Xia, 2016. "Utility Evaluation Based on One-To-N Mapping in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game for Interdependent Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Yang, Ran, 2019. "Using rewards reasonably: The effects of stratified-rewards in public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 67-74.
    7. Du, Faqi & Fu, Feng, 2013. "Quantifying the impact of noise on macroscopic organization of cooperation in spatial games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 35-44.
    8. Te Wu & Long Wang & Feng Fu, 2017. "Coevolutionary dynamics of phenotypic diversity and contingent cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Wang, Chengjiang & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 18-29.
    10. Lv, Shaojie & Wang, Xianjia, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    11. Hu, Menglong & Wang, Juan & Kong, Lingcong & An, Kang & Bi, Tao & Guo, Baohong & Dong, Enzeng, 2015. "Incorporating the information from direct and indirect neighbors into fitness evaluation enhances the cooperation in the social dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 47-52.
    12. Genki Ichinose & Masaya Saito & Shinsuke Suzuki, 2013. "Collective Chasing Behavior between Cooperators and Defectors in the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    13. Jin, Jiahua & Shen, Chen & Chu, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Incorporating dominant environment into individual fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoners' dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 70-75.
    14. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Chang, Shuhua & Zhang, Zhipeng & Wu, Yu’e & Xie, Yunya, 2018. "Cooperation is enhanced by inhomogeneous inertia in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 419-425.
    16. Zhou, Tianwei & Ding, Shuai & Fan, Wenjuan & Wang, Hao, 2016. "An improved public goods game model with reputation effect on the spatial lattices," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 130-135.
    17. Zhuang, Qian & Wang, Dong & Fan, Ying & Di, Zengru, 2012. "Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous population with influential individuals," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(4), pages 1735-1741.
    18. Zhenghong Wu & Huan Huang & Qinghu Liao, 2021. "The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Chen, Mei-huan & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shi-wen & Xia, Cheng-yi, 2015. "Impact of individual response strategy on the spatial public goods game within mobile agents," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 192-202.
    20. Ding, Chenxi & Wang, Juan & Zhang, Ying, 2016. "Impact of self interaction on the evolution of cooperation in social spatial dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 393-399.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:100-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.