IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v254y2019ics0306261919313534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for subsurface uncertainty in enhanced geothermal systems to make more robust techno-economic decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Pollack, Ahinoam
  • Mukerji, Tapan

Abstract

It has been estimated that Enhanced Geothermal Systems could supply 100 GWe (10%) of total electric capacity in the U.S. An Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) is created by stimulating an impermeable hot rock, injecting cold water into the hot reservoir, and extracting the heated water to generate electricity. EGS projects are still not commercially feasible, however, due to many challenges, including subsurface uncertainty. There are many uncertain structural and geological features when creating an EGS. With uncertain reservoir properties, it is difficult to optimize decisions that will greatly improve EGS profitability. Currently, a common method of optimizing an EGS is choosing the most representative subsurface reservoir model and optimizing the engineering parameters for this single reservoir model, or Single-Model Optimization (SM-Opt). Due to availability of larger computational power, another feasible option is accounting for subsurface uncertainty by optimizing an EGS given an ensemble of reservoir models, or Multiple Model Optimization (MM-Opt). This option is less common in practice within the geothermal industry since it lags in harnessing computational power. This study compares these two methods for optimizing eight common EGS engineering decisions, including well configuration and fracture spacing. The decisions were optimized to maximize the Net Present Value (NPV) of an EGS. We have found that using SM-Opt, the optimal engineering decisions led to an EGS with a NPV estimate of $32.7 million. This contrasts with the MM-Opt results where the optimal engineering decisions led to a median NPV value of $11 million and a standard deviation of $15 million. This comparison illustrates how ignoring subsurface uncertainty and heterogeneity leads to over-optimistic NPV forecasts. For this study, the SM-Opt optimum decisions were similar to the robust decisions identified using MM-Opt. Yet, in contrast to SM-Opt, the MM-Opt workflow provided an analysis of the influential engineering parameters and a NPV uncertainty range, which was used to ensure decision robustness.

Suggested Citation

  • Pollack, Ahinoam & Mukerji, Tapan, 2019. "Accounting for subsurface uncertainty in enhanced geothermal systems to make more robust techno-economic decisions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:254:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919313534
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919313534
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Yu & Song, Xianzhi & Shen, Zhonghou & Wang, Gaosheng & Li, Xiaojiang & Zheng, Rui & Geng, Lidong & Li, Jiacheng & Zhang, Shikun, 2018. "Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of a CO2 enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 38-51.
    2. Lukawski, Maciej Z. & DiPippo, Ronald & Tester, Jefferson W., 2018. "Molecular property methods for assessing efficiency of organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 108-120.
    3. Asai, Pranay & Panja, Palash & McLennan, John & Moore, Joseph, 2018. "Performance evaluation of enhanced geothermal system (EGS): Surrogate models, sensitivity study and ranking key parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 184-195.
    4. Hofmann, Hannes & Babadagli, Tayfun & Zimmermann, Günter, 2014. "Hot water generation for oil sands processing from enhanced geothermal systems: Process simulation for different hydraulic fracturing scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 524-547.
    5. Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Li, Gensheng & Yang, Ruiyue & Wang, Gaosheng & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng & Lyu, Zehao, 2018. "Numerical simulation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 325-337.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xinxin & Li, Chengyu & Gong, Wenping & Zhang, Yanjie & Wang, Junchao, 2023. "Probabilistic analysis of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system based on a DFN-based modeling scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    2. Fan, Huifang & Zhang, Luyi & Wang, Ruifei & Song, Hongqing & Xie, Hui & Du, Li & Sun, Pengguang, 2020. "Investigation on geothermal water reservoir development and utilization with variable temperature regulation: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Saeid, Sanaz & Doonechaly, Nima Gholizadeh, 2021. "The fault plane as the main fluid pathway: Geothermal field development options under subsurface and operational uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 927-946.
    4. Palomo-Torrejón, Elisabet & Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Mur-Pérez, Francisco, 2021. "Economic and environmental benefits of geothermal energy in industrial processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 134-146.
    5. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2022. "Utilizing geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems as a heat source for oil sands separation: A numerical evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    6. Chen, Guodong & Luo, Xin & Jiao, Jiu Jimmy & Jiang, Chuanyin, 2023. "Fracture network characterization with deep generative model based stochastic inversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    7. Zahir Barahmand & Marianne S. Eikeland, 2022. "Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Cost Analysis through the Lens of Uncertainty: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Palomo-Torrejón, Elisabet & Mur-Pérez, Francisco & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique, 2020. "Thermal desalination potential with parabolic trough collectors and geothermal energy in the Spanish southeast," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Bennett, Jeffrey A. & Fitts, Jeffrey P. & Clarens, Andres F., 2022. "Compressed air energy storage capacity of offshore saline aquifers using isothermal cycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    10. Zolfaghari, Seyed Mohammad & Soltani, M. & Hosseinpour, Morteza & Nathwani, Jatin, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis of geothermal energy integration with heavy oil upgrading in hot compressed water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Qiu, Lihua & He, Li & Kang, Yu & Liang, Dongzhe, 2022. "Assessment of the potential of enhanced geothermal systems in Asia under the impact of global warming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 636-646.
    12. Liang, Xu & Xu, Tianfu & Chen, Jingyi & Jiang, Zhenjiao, 2023. "A deep-learning based model for fracture network characterization constrained by induced micro-seismicity and tracer test data in enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    13. Yu, Guojun & Li, Huyu & Liu, Cong & Cheng, Wan & Xu, Huijin, 2023. "Thermal and hydraulic characteristics of a new proposed flyover-crossing fracture configuration for the enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 859-873.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2022. "Utilizing geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems as a heat source for oil sands separation: A numerical evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Linkai Li & Xiao Guo & Ming Zhou & Gang Xiang & Ning Zhang & Yue Wang & Shengyuan Wang & Arnold Landjobo Pagou, 2021. "The Investigation of Fracture Networks on Heat Extraction Performance for an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Wei, Xin & Feng, Zi-jun & Zhao, Yang-sheng, 2019. "Numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling effect in mining fault-mode hot dry rock geothermal energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 120-135.
    4. Lin, David T.W. & Hsieh, Jui Ching & Shih, Bo Yen, 2019. "The optimization of geothermal extraction based on supercritical CO2 porous heat transfer model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1162-1171.
    5. Zhou, Luming & Zhu, Zhende & Xie, Xinghua & Hu, Yunjin, 2022. "Coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical model for an enhanced geothermal system and numerical analysis of its heat mining performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1440-1458.
    6. Shu, Biao & Zhu, Runjun & Elsworth, Derek & Dick, Jeffrey & Liu, Shun & Tan, Jingqiang & Zhang, Shaohe, 2020. "Effect of temperature and confining pressure on the evolution of hydraulic and heat transfer properties of geothermal fracture in granite," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    7. Yin, Weitao & Zhao, Yangsheng & Feng, Zijun, 2020. "Experimental research on the permeability of fractured-subsequently-filled granite under high temperature-high pressure and the application to HDR geothermal mining," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 499-508.
    8. Yu, Likui & Wu, Xiaotian & Hassan, N.M.S. & Wang, Yadan & Ma, Weiwu & Liu, Gang, 2020. "Modified zipper fracturing in enhanced geothermal system reservoir and heat extraction optimization via orthogonal design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 373-385.
    9. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Yu, Chao & Shi, Yu & Song, Guofeng & Xu, Fuqiang & Ji, Jiayan & Song, Zihao, 2022. "Heat extraction study of a novel hydrothermal open-loop geothermal system in a multi-lateral horizontal well," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Zhang, Chao & Jiang, Guangzheng & Jia, Xiaofeng & Li, Shengtao & Zhang, Shengsheng & Hu, Di & Hu, Shengbiao & Wang, Yibo, 2019. "Parametric study of the production performance of an enhanced geothermal system: A case study at the Qiabuqia geothermal area, northeast Tibetan plateau," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 959-978.
    11. Zhang, Jie & Xie, Jingxuan, 2020. "Effect of reservoir’s permeability and porosity on the performance of cellular development model for enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 824-838.
    12. Salimzadeh, S. & Grandahl, M. & Medetbekova, M. & Nick, H.M., 2019. "A novel radial jet drilling stimulation technique for enhancing heat recovery from fractured geothermal reservoirs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 395-409.
    13. Wang, Nanzhe & Chang, Haibin & Kong, Xiang-Zhao & Zhang, Dongxiao, 2023. "Deep learning based closed-loop well control optimization of geothermal reservoir with uncertain permeability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 379-394.
    14. Shi, Yu & Song, Xianzhi & Wang, Gaosheng & McLennan, John & Forbes, Bryan & Li, Xiaojiang & Li, Jiacheng, 2019. "Study on wellbore fluid flow and heat transfer of a multilateral-well CO2 enhanced geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 14-27.
    15. Zhao, Peng & Liu, Jun & Elsworth, Derek, 2023. "Numerical study on a multifracture enhanced geothermal system considering matrix permeability enhancement induced by thermal unloading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 33-44.
    16. Song, Xianzhi & Zhang, Chengkai & Shi, Yu & Li, Gensheng, 2019. "Production performance of oil shale in-situ conversion with multilateral wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Chunguang & Guo, Tiankui & He, Jiayuan & Zhang, Le & Chen, Shaojie & Qu, Zhanqing, 2021. "Study on the cracking mechanism of hydraulic and supercritical CO2 fracturing in hot dry rock under thermal stress," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2021. "Retrofitting abandoned petroleum wells as doublet deep borehole heat exchangers for geothermal energy production—a numerical investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 115-134.
    19. Yang, Ruiyue & Hong, Chunyang & Liu, Wei & Wu, Xiaoguang & Wang, Tianyu & Huang, Zhongwei, 2021. "Non-contaminating cryogenic fluid access to high-temperature resources: Liquid nitrogen fracturing in a lab-scale Enhanced Geothermal System," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 125-138.
    20. Esmaeilpour, Morteza & Gholami Korzani, Maziar & Kohl, Thomas, 2023. "Stochastic performance assessment on long-term behavior of multilateral closed deep geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 26-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:254:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919313534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.