IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v352y2019icp174-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expectation driven by update willingness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qiuling
  • Jia, Danyang

Abstract

In real life, everyone is full of yearning and pursuit for future life. The difference between reality and ideals encourage people to constantly adjust the current state, so that they can better adapt to changes in the surrounding environment. Thus, we propose a spatial prisoner's dilemma game model where individuals have expectation towards the payoff obtained from nearest neighbors, and individuals can adaptively adjust their update willingness based on the satisfaction of income. Through numerical calculation, we find that different b values will have an appropriate aspiration level to promote cooperation. In addition, the results have an obvious phase transition phenomenon for individual's aspiration level on promoting cooperation. Moreover, only moderate aspiration level can promote the evolution of cooperative behavior, due to it can lead to the heterogeneous distribution of update willingness, which will be beneficial to the evolution of cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qiuling & Jia, Danyang, 2019. "Expectation driven by update willingness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 352(C), pages 174-179.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:352:y:2019:i:c:p:174-179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.01.057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300319300748
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2019.01.057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Szolnoki & M. Perc & G. Szabó, 2008. "Diversity of reproduction rate supports cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game on complex networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 505-509, February.
    2. Niu, Zhenxi & Xu, Jiwei & Dai, Dameng & Liang, Tairan & Mao, Deming & Zhao, Dawei, 2018. "Rational conformity behavior can promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 92-96.
    3. Zhi Li & Zhihu Yang & Te Wu & Long Wang, 2014. "Aspiration-Based Partner Switching Boosts Cooperation in Social Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Li, Yumeng & Zhang, Jun & Perc, Matjaž, 2018. "Effects of compassion on the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 437-443.
    5. Zhen Wang & Marko Jusup & Lei Shi & Joung-Hun Lee & Yoh Iwasa & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Exploiting a cognitive bias promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Zhenhua Pei & Baokui Wang & Jinming Du, 2016. "Effects of income redistribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Papers 1611.01531, arXiv.org.
    7. Tanimoto, Jun, 2013. "Coevolutionary, coexisting learning and teaching agents model for prisoner’s dilemma games enhancing cooperation with assortative heterogeneous networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(13), pages 2955-2964.
    8. Xuelong Li & Marko Jusup & Zhen Wang & Huijia Li & Lei Shi & Boris Podobnik & H. Eugene Stanley & Shlomo Havlin & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(1), pages 30-35, January.
    9. F. Fu & L.-H. Liu & L. Wang, 2007. "Evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma on heterogeneous Newman-Watts small-world network," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 367-372, April.
    10. Ken Binmore, 1994. "Game Theory and the Social Contract, Volume 1: Playing Fair," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262023636, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Bin & Kang, Wenjun & Sheng, Jinfang & Cheng, Lvhang & Hou, Zhengang, 2021. "Effects of trust-driven updating rule based on reputation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 579(C).
    2. Lu, Shounan & Zhu, Ge & Dai, Jianhua, 2023. "Promoting effect of adaptive interaction based on random neighbors to cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    3. Pan, Qiuhui & Wang, Yue & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "Impacts of special cooperation strategy with reward and punishment mechanism on cooperation evolution," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Gu, Cuiling & Wang, Xianjia & Zhao, Jinhua & Ding, Rui & He, Qilong, 2020. "Evolutionary game dynamics of Moran process with fuzzy payoffs and its application," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    5. Wang, Qiuling & Ren, Xiaobin & Gao, Bo & Wang, Jiaqian, 2020. "Heterogeneity reproductive ability promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Liu, Siyuan & Zhang, Chunyan & Li, Kun & Zhang, Jianlei, 2022. "Exploring the inducement for social dilemma and cooperation promotion mechanisms in structured populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Han, Xu & Zhao, Xiaowei & Xia, Haoxiang, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation through aspiration-based adjustment of interaction range in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    8. Yunsheng Deng & Jihui Zhang, 2022. "The choice-decision based on memory and payoff favors cooperation in stag hunt game on interdependent networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(2), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Zeng, Weijun & Ai, Hongfeng & Zhao, Man, 2019. "Asymmetrical expectations of future interaction and cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 148-164.
    10. Lu, Shounan & Dai, Jianhua & Zhu, Ge & Guo, Li, 2023. "Investigating the effectiveness of interaction-efficiency-driven strategy updating under progressive-interaction for the evolution of the prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Qiuling & Ren, Xiaobin & Gao, Bo & Wang, Jiaqian, 2020. "Heterogeneity reproductive ability promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Wang, Qiuling & Meng, Haoran & Gao, Bo, 2019. "Spontaneous punishment promotes cooperation in public good game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 183-187.
    3. Li, Zhibin & Jia, Danyang & Guo, Hao & Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Wang, Zhen & Li, Xuelong, 2019. "The effect of multigame on cooperation in spatial network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 162-167.
    4. Sun, Chengbin & Luo, Chao, 2020. "Co-evolution of limited resources in the memory-based spatial evolutionary game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Yang, Xuenan & Peng, Yu & Xiao, Yue & Wu, Xue, 2019. "Nonlinear dynamics of a duopoly Stackelberg game with marginal costs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 185-191.
    6. Liu, Chen & Guo, Hao & Li, Zhibin & Gao, Xiaoyuan & Li, Shudong, 2019. "Coevolution of multi-game resolves social dilemma in network population," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 402-407.
    7. Huang, Yi Jie & Deng, Zheng Hong & Song, Qun & Wu, Tao & Deng, Zhi Long & Gao, Ming yu, 2019. "The evolution of cooperation in multi-games with aspiration-driven updating rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 313-317.
    8. Hu, Kaipeng & Guo, Hao & Geng, Yini & Shi, Lei, 2019. "The effect of conformity on the evolution of cooperation in multigame," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 267-272.
    9. Gao, Bo & liu, Xuan & Hou, Shuxia & Jia, Danyang & Du, Mingjing, 2019. "Resolving public goods dilemma by giving the poor more support," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 362(C), pages 1-1.
    10. You, Tao & Wang, Peng & Jia, Danyang & Yang, Fei & Cui, Xiaodong & Liu, Chen, 2020. "The effects of heterogeneity of updating rules on cooperation in spatial network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    11. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Wang, Zi-Ren & Deng, Zheng-Hong & Wang, Huan-Bo & Qu, Yun, 2021. "Moderate irrational sentiment-driven fitness can promote cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    13. Li, Xiaoyu & Jia, Danyang & Niu, Xiaotong & Liu, Chen & Zhu, Peican & Liu, Dujuan & Chu, Chen, 2022. "Ability-based asymmetrical fitness calculation promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
    14. Wang, Qiuling & Du, Chunpeng, 2019. "Impact of expansion of priority range on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 77-80.
    15. Dehghani, Sedigheh & Nazarimehr, Fahimeh & Jafari, Sajad, 2021. "How can cultural conditions affect society’s decisions?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    16. Kurokawa, Shun, 2019. "How memory cost, switching cost, and payoff non-linearity affect the evolution of persistence," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 174-192.
    17. Jin, Jiahua & Chu, Chen & Shen, Chen & Guo, Hao & Geng, Yini & Jia, Danyang & Shi, Lei, 2018. "Heterogeneous fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-146.
    18. Pi, Bin & Li, Yuhan & Feng, Minyu, 2022. "An evolutionary game with conformists and profiteers regarding the memory mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    19. Iwamura, Yoshiro & Nagashima, Keisuke & Tanimoto, Jun, 2020. "Evolutionary dynamics of a 3-strategy game: Cooperator, defector and costly cooperative loner strategic types," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    20. Zhang, Xiaoyang & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao & Li, Xueya, 2020. "Will you cooperate in case the payoff can be guaranteed?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:352:y:2019:i:c:p:174-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.