IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v321y2025ics0378377425006328.html

Synergistic regulation of humic acid and aeration: Enhancing yield of processing tomato by improving soil environment under water-saving mulched drip irrigation

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Jiaying
  • Chen, Rui
  • Wen, Yue
  • Zhang, Jinzhu
  • Yin, Feihu
  • Ma, Zhanli
  • Zheng, Jiliang
  • Wang, Zhenhua

Abstract

Mulched drip irrigation has been proven to reduce irrigation water usage while significantly increasing crop yields. However, its long-term application poses a potential risk of soil quality degradation. Therefore, achieving the synergistic regulation of water, fertilizer, and aeration through drip irrigation is crucial for improving soil quality and environmental conditions, thereby enhancing crop productivity. To investigate the synergistic regulation of humic acid and aeration on soil quality and their impact on processing tomato yield, a field experiment was conducted in Xinjiang, a region in China with arid conditions, in 2023 and 2024. The study employed urea as the nitrogen fertilizer and assessed the combined effects of three humic acid additions (H1: 0 %, H2: 0.25 %, H3: 0.5 %) and three aeration methods (A1: Ungassed, 5 mg/L; A2: Micro-nano aerated, 18 mg/L; A3: Venturi aeration, 9 mg/L) under 450 mm irrigation amount. Results showed that the synergistic regulation of humic acid and aeration significantly enhanced soil nutrient indicators. Compared to the conventional treatment (H1A1), the addition of 0.5 % humic acid under micro-nano aeration (H3A2) significantly increased soil NH4+ -N (46.21–51.49 %), TN (47.07–47.42 %), and TC (18.72–21.79 %). The activities of soil catalase (CAT, 9.91–14.29 %), nitrate reductase (NR, 9.98–15.54 %), sucrase (27.35–28.19 %), and urease (1.72–13.31 %) were all significantly improved. Moreover, the abundance of dominant bacterial and fungal species was notably increased. RDA analysis was used to identify the key soil environmental factors influencing soil bacteria (NH4+-N, NO3⁻-N, TC, NR, and Sucrase) and fungi (NH4+-N, NO3⁻-N, TC, NR, and CAT). Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis of these indicators revealed the impact pathways of humic acid and aeration on bacteria and fungi. Both humic acid and aeration had a positive effect on bacteria (0.815 and 0.068) and fungi (0.481 and 0.251). Correlation analysis indicated that the key environmental factors influencing yield improvement were Actinobacteriota (bacteria phylum level), Dothideomycetes (fungi class level), and TC. The highest yield of 313.92 t/ha was achieved with the H3A2. The soil quality index (SQI) analysis revealed that H3A2 yielded the highest SQI. Additionally, model fitting indicated that H3A2 synergistically improved both soil quality and processing tomato yield. These findings provide valuable new insights into the development of sustainable agricultural production in arid regions, particularly regarding the effects of integrated water-fertilizer-aeration management strategies on soil nutrients, the soil microenvironment, and processing tomato yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Jiaying & Chen, Rui & Wen, Yue & Zhang, Jinzhu & Yin, Feihu & Ma, Zhanli & Zheng, Jiliang & Wang, Zhenhua, 2025. "Synergistic regulation of humic acid and aeration: Enhancing yield of processing tomato by improving soil environment under water-saving mulched drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:321:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425006328
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425006328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:321:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425006328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.