IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v309y2025ics0378377425000368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to predict winter wheat actual evapotranspiration through machine learning and deep learning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yao
  • Liu, Xuanang
  • Zhang, Xuegui
  • Gu, Xiaobo
  • Yu, Lianyu
  • Cai, Huanjie
  • Peng, Xiongbiao

Abstract

As the world's largest wheat producer, accurately and timely predicting the actual evapotranspiration (ETc_act) during the growth period of winter wheat is crucial for improving farmland water use efficiency and yield in China. Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) is a radiative signal emitted during plant photosynthesis, and ETc_act is largely influenced by photosynthetic efficiency. Therefore, SIF demonstrates significant potential for predicting ETc_act over large spatial scales and long temporal sequences. This study combined meteorological data with two remote sensing variables, Leaf Area Index (LAI) and SIF, to construct four models: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Support Vector Regression (SVR) Machine, and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks. These models were applied to predict ETc_act at seven sites across the North China Plain and Guanzhong Plain. The results showed that in the feature importance ranking based on the Maximal Information Coefficient (MIC) method, air temperature (T), LAI, and SIF all had high importance scores (>0.3), making them important features for predicting ETc_act. The simulation accuracy and stability of the RF and LSTM models were higher than those of the SVR and GB models. The LSTM model maintained stable simulation accuracy across both strategies and all sites, with an average R2 of 0.754 and RMSE of 0.831 mm across all simulation scenarios. Incorporating SIF with LAI and meteorological data significantly enhanced the prediction accuracy. Under identical feature counts, feature sets including SIF improved the estimation performance of all models. Compared to the traditional Penman-Monteith equation, the LSTM model demonstrated higher accuracy in simulating ETc_act values of winter wheat, reducing the daily average ETc_act difference across all sites by 0.141 and increasing R2 by 0.082. The results can provide important references for accurate prediction of ETc_act and the development of reasonable irrigation schemes in major winter wheat production areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yao & Liu, Xuanang & Zhang, Xuegui & Gu, Xiaobo & Yu, Lianyu & Cai, Huanjie & Peng, Xiongbiao, 2025. "Using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to predict winter wheat actual evapotranspiration through machine learning and deep learning methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:309:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425000368
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425000368
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen, Richard G. & Pruitt, William O. & Wright, James L. & Howell, Terry A. & Ventura, Francesca & Snyder, Richard & Itenfisu, Daniel & Steduto, Pasquale & Berengena, Joaquin & Yrisarry, Javier Basel, 2006. "A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Sentelhas, Paulo C. & Gillespie, Terry J. & Santos, Eduardo A., 2010. "Evaluation of FAO Penman-Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 635-644, May.
    3. Wang, Yunfei & Zou, Yufeng & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Yijian & He, Jianqiang & Yu, Lianyu & Zhang, Chao & Saddique, Qaisar & Peng, Xiongbiao & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Yu, Qiang & Su, Zhongbo, 2022. "Seasonal variation and controlling factors of evapotranspiration over dry semi-humid cropland in Guanzhong Plain, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Liting Liu & Chunsheng Hu & Jørgen E. Olesen & Zhaoqiang Ju & Xiying Zhang, 2016. "Effect of warming and nitrogen addition on evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in a wheat-soybean/fallow rotation from 2010 to 2014," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 565-578, December.
    5. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S., 2019. "Computing FAO56 reference grass evapotranspiration PM-ETo from temperature with focus on solar radiation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 86-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S. & Almorox, J. & Darouich, H., 2020. "Reference grass evapotranspiration with reduced data sets: Parameterization of the FAO Penman-Monteith temperature approach and the Hargeaves-Samani equation using local climatic variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Gonçalo C. Rodrigues & Ricardo P. Braga, 2021. "Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration during the Irrigation Season Using Nine Temperature-Based Methods in a Hot-Summer Mediterranean Climate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Choudhury, B.U. & Singh, Anil Kumar & Pradhan, S., 2013. "Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-31.
    4. Paredes, Paula & Trigo, Isabel & de Bruin, Henk & Simões, Nuno & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Daily grass reference evapotranspiration with Meteosat Second Generation shortwave radiation and reference ET products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Mingze Yao & Manman Gao & Jingkuan Wang & Bo Li & Lizhen Mao & Mingyu Zhao & Zhanyang Xu & Hongfei Niu & Tieliang Wang & Lei Sun & Dongshuang Niu, 2023. "Estimating Evapotranspiration of Greenhouse Tomato under Different Irrigation Levels Using a Modified Dual Crop Coefficient Model in Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Martí, Pau & López-Urrea, Ramón & Mancha, Luis A. & González-Altozano, Pablo & Román, Armand, 2024. "Seasonal assessment of the grass reference evapotranspiration estimation from limited inputs using different calibrating time windows and lysimeter benchmarks," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    8. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi, 2022. "Reference crop evapotranspiration for data-sparse regions using reanalysis products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Laishram Kanta Singh & Madan K. Jha & Mohita Pandey, 2018. "Framework for Standardizing Less Data-Intensive Methods of Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(13), pages 4159-4175, October.
    10. Vásquez, Cristina & Célleri, Rolando & Córdova, Mario & Carrillo-Rojas, Galo, 2022. "Improving reference evapotranspiration (ETo) calculation under limited data conditions in the high Tropical Andes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    11. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Jovanovic, N., 2020. "Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França, 2020. "New approach to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration based on hourly temperature and relative humidity using machine learning and deep learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Cunha, Angélica Carvalho & Filho, Luís Roberto Almeida Gabriel & Tanaka, Adriana Aki & Goes, Bruno Cesar & Putti, Fernando Ferrari, 2021. "Influence Of The Estimated Global Solar Radiation On The Reference Evapotranspiration Obtained Through The Penman-Monteith Fao 56 Method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    14. Panagiotis Christias & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Mariana Mocanu, 2020. "Comparison of Three Computational Approaches for Tree Crop Irrigation Decision Support," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Chintala, Syam & Karimindla, Arun Rao & Kambhammettu, BVN P., 2024. "Scaling relations between leaf and plant water use efficiencies in rainfed Cotton," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    16. Althoff, Daniel & Filgueiras, Roberto & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Rodrigues, Lineu Neiva, 2019. "Impact of sum-of-hourly and daily timesteps in the computations of reference evapotranspiration across the Brazilian territory," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Pozníková, Gabriela & Fischer, Milan & van Kesteren, Bram & Orság, Matěj & Hlavinka, Petr & Žalud, Zdeněk & Trnka, Miroslav, 2018. "Quantifying turbulent energy fluxes and evapotranspiration in agricultural field conditions: A comparison of micrometeorological methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 249-263.
    18. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Mota, M. & Wang, T., 2021. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height: Practical application to vegetable, field and fruit crops with focus on parameterization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    19. Hamani, Abdoul Kader Mounkaila & Liu, Junming & Si, Zhuanyun & Kpalari, Djifa Fidele & Wang, Guangshuai & Gao, Yang & Ju, Xiaotang, 2024. "The relationship of δD and δ18O in soil water and its implications for soil evaporation across distinct rainfall years in winter wheat field in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    20. Luis Santos Pereira, 2017. "Water, Agriculture and Food: Challenges and Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2985-2999, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:309:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425000368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.