IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v291y2024ics0378377423005024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of small emitter flow rate in drip irrigation favored methane uptake in arid potato fields

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Jianyu
  • Meng, Chaobiao
  • Yang, Kaijing
  • Shock, Clinton C.
  • Wang, Ning
  • Wang, Fengxin

Abstract

Drip irrigation has been widely used in agriculture, while the mechanism underlying the effect of drip irrigation system design and management on soil methane (CH4) uptake have not been fully studied. A two-year experiment was conducted to explore the effects of different emitter flow rates of drip irrigation (1.3, 2.0, and 3.0 L/h) on CH4 uptake in potato fields in an arid region of Northwest China. Results showed that compared to emitter flow rates of 2.0 and 3.0 L/h, the 1.3 L/h flow rate significantly increased the cumulative CH4 uptake by 6.3–16.2%, mainly due to the increase in the abundance of the pmoA gene by 15.2–49.5%, and by the decrease of water-filled pore space (WFPS), increasing the effective CH4 diffusion coefficient (Dp) and soil oxygen concentration in the topsoil. A hump-shaped relationship was found between WFPS and CH4 uptake flux, and the optimum WFPS for CH4 uptake was about 44.8%. The treatment with an emitter flow rate of 1.3 L/h exhibited the highest frequency (28.6%) of favorable WFPS for CH4 uptake, compared to the 2.0 and 3.0 L/h treatments. In addition, significant negative quadratic relationships were observed between both Dp and soil oxygen with CH4 uptake, and optimal values were 0.02 cm2 s−1 and 18.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in CH4 uptake between 2.0 and 3.0 L/h treatments in 2021 and 2022, due to high WFPS and low oxygen concentrations in both treatments. Multiple linear regressions indicated that soil oxygen concentration became a major limiting factor under emitter flow rates of 2.0 and 3.0 L/h. This study provides insights into mechanisms of soil CH4 uptake in drip-irrigated farmland, which gives guidance on developing irrigation strategies for sustainable production and CH4 mitigation in irrigated arid land.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Jianyu & Meng, Chaobiao & Yang, Kaijing & Shock, Clinton C. & Wang, Ning & Wang, Fengxin, 2024. "The use of small emitter flow rate in drip irrigation favored methane uptake in arid potato fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:291:y:2024:i:c:s0378377423005024
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423005024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:291:y:2024:i:c:s0378377423005024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.