IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v276y2023ics0378377422005996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and optimization of surge and alternate furrow irrigation performance in maize fields using the WinSRFR software

Author

Listed:
  • Mehri, Akbar
  • Mohammadi, Amir Soltani
  • Ebrahimian, Hamed
  • Boroomandnasab, Saeid

Abstract

Low efficiency of irrigation is a major problem with surface irrigation methods, mainly due to poor management and improper design. The objective of this study was to evaluate and improve the performance of different surge and alternate furrow irrigation methods. A field experiment was conducted during the grain maize growing season in the Jayedar Plain of Poldokhtar City (southwest of Iran) in the years 2020 and 2021. Five different furrow irrigation methods including conventional furrow irrigation (CFI), surge irrigation with on/off cycle ratios of 1 and 0.5 (SFI1–1 and SFI1–2, respectively), fixed alternate irrigation (FFI) and variable alternate irrigation (AFI) were investigated. A total of 15 irrigation evaluations were performed at the initial, middle, and end of the growing season by measuring inflow rate, cutoff time, outflow rate, infiltration and advance time. The length and spacing of experimental furrows were 120 and 0.75 m, respectively, and the inflow rate of furrows and the flow cutoff times at the initial (3rd irrigation), middle (6th irrigation), and end (9th irrigation) of the season were 0.28 L/s and 240 min, 0.42 L/s and 360 min, 0.35 L/s and 300 min, respectively. The WinSRFR 3.1 software was calibrated and applied using field data based on the zero-inertia model. The results of the furrow irrigation sensitivity analysis with WinSRFR 3.1 software demonstrated that furrow irrigation in the studied area was most sensitive to the inflow rate, cutoff time and infiltration parameters, respectively. There were high correlations between the measured and simulated values of runoff, infiltration and advance time (coefficient of determination of 1.0, 0.94, and 0.97, respectively). The relative error values in estimating runoff, infiltration and advance time were 5.60 %, 5.09 %, and 2.14 %, respectively. Mean performance indices of different furrow irrigation methods under field experiments showed that the highest values of Application Efficiency (78.7 %), Potential Application Efficiency of the minimum (69.5 %), and Potential Application Efficiency of low-quarter (74.1 %) were observed under the AFI method. By optimizing the inflow rate and flow cutoff time, application efficiencies of 66.6–80.7 % were obtained for different irrigation methods. The results of this study show that AFI is a more suitable method for maize irrigation in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehri, Akbar & Mohammadi, Amir Soltani & Ebrahimian, Hamed & Boroomandnasab, Saeid, 2023. "Evaluation and optimization of surge and alternate furrow irrigation performance in maize fields using the WinSRFR software," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422005996
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422005996
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fu, Qiang & Hou, Renjie & Li, Tianxiao & Li, Yue & Liu, Dong & Li, Mo, 2019. "A new infiltration model for simulating soil water movement in canal irrigation under laboratory conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 433-444.
    2. Bautista, E. & Clemmens, A.J. & Strelkoff, T.S. & Schlegel, J., 2009. "Modern analysis of surface irrigation systems with WinSRFR," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 1146-1154, July.
    3. Salahou, Mohamed Khaled & Jiao, Xiyun & Lü, Haishen, 2018. "Border irrigation performance with distance-based cut-off," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 27-37.
    4. Mazarei, Reza & Mohammadi, Amir Soltani & Naseri, Abd Ali & Ebrahimian, Hamed & Izadpanah, Zahra, 2020. "Optimization of furrow irrigation performance of sugarcane fields based on inflow and geometric parameters using WinSRFR in Southwest of Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Xu, Jiatun & Cai, Huanjie & Saddique, Qaisar & Wang, Xiaoyun & Li, Liang & Ma, Chenguang & Lu, Yajun, 2019. "Evaluation and optimization of border irrigation in different irrigation seasons based on temporal variation of infiltration and roughness," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 64-77.
    6. Smith, R.J. & Raine, S.R. & Minkevich, J., 2005. "Irrigation application efficiency and deep drainage potential under surface irrigated cotton," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 117-130, February.
    7. Morris, Michael R. & Hussain, Amjed & Gillies, Malcolm H. & O’Halloran, Nicholas J., 2015. "Inflow rate and border irrigation performance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 76-86.
    8. Nie, Wei-Bo & Li, Yi-Bo & Zhang, Fan & Ma, Xiao-Yi, 2019. "Optimal discharge for closed-end border irrigation under soil infiltration variability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 58-65.
    9. Kifle, Mulubrehan & Gebremicael, T.G. & Girmay, Abbadi & Gebremedihin, Teferi, 2017. "Effect of surge flow and alternate irrigation on the irrigation efficiency and water productivity of onion in the semi-arid areas of North Ethiopia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 69-76.
    10. Smith, R.J. & Uddin, M.J. & Gillies, M.H., 2018. "Estimating irrigation duration for high performance furrow irrigation on cracking clay soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 78-85.
    11. Ebrahimian, Hamed & Ghaffari, Parisa & Ghameshlou, Arezoo N. & Tabatabaei, Sayyed-Hassan & Alizadeh Dizaj, Amin, 2020. "Extensive comparison of various infiltration estimation methods for furrow irrigation under different field conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi & Pereira, Luis S. & Bybordi, Mohammad, 2023. "Water management dilemma in the agricultural sector of Iran: A review focusing on water governance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mazarei, Reza & Soltani Mohammadi, Amir & Ebrahimian, Hamed & Naseri, Abd Ali, 2021. "Temporal variability of infiltration and roughness coefficients and furrow irrigation performance under different inflow rates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Costabile, Pierfranco & Costanzo, Carmelina & Gangi, Fabiola & De Gaetani, Carlo Iapige & Rossi, Lorenzo & Gandolfi, Claudio & Masseroni, Daniele, 2023. "High-resolution 2D modelling for simulating and improving the management of border irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Mazarei, Reza & Mohammadi, Amir Soltani & Naseri, Abd Ali & Ebrahimian, Hamed & Izadpanah, Zahra, 2020. "Optimization of furrow irrigation performance of sugarcane fields based on inflow and geometric parameters using WinSRFR in Southwest of Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Nie, Wei-Bo & Dong, Shu-Xin & Li, Yi-Bo & Ma, Xiao-Yi, 2021. "Optimization of the border size on the irrigation district scale – Example of the Hetao irrigation district," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Pazouki, Ehsan, 2021. "A practical surface irrigation design based on fuzzy logic and meta-heuristic algorithms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Pazouki, Ehsan, 2021. "A practical surface irrigation system design based on volume balance model and multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    7. Pazouki, Ehsan, 2023. "A smart surface irrigation design based on the topographical and geometrical shape characteristics of the land," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Mohamed Khaled Salahou & Xiyun Jiao & Haishen Lü & Weihua Guo, 2020. "An improved approach to estimating the infiltration characteristics in surface irrigation systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Xu, Jiatun & Cai, Huanjie & Saddique, Qaisar & Wang, Xiaoyun & Li, Liang & Ma, Chenguang & Lu, Yajun, 2019. "Evaluation and optimization of border irrigation in different irrigation seasons based on temporal variation of infiltration and roughness," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 64-77.
    10. Kaihua Liu & Xiyun Jiao & Weihua Guo & Yunhao An & Mohamed Khaled Salahou, 2020. "Improving border irrigation performance with predesigned varied-discharge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Ebrahimian, Hamed & Ghaffari, Parisa & Ghameshlou, Arezoo N. & Tabatabaei, Sayyed-Hassan & Alizadeh Dizaj, Amin, 2020. "Extensive comparison of various infiltration estimation methods for furrow irrigation under different field conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Nie, Wei-Bo & Li, Yi-Bo & Zhang, Fan & Ma, Xiao-Yi, 2019. "Optimal discharge for closed-end border irrigation under soil infiltration variability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 58-65.
    13. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Smith, RJ & Uddin, MJ, 2020. "Selection of flow rate and irrigation duration for high performance bay irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Salahou, Mohamed Khaled & Jiao, Xiyun & Lü, Haishen, 2018. "Border irrigation performance with distance-based cut-off," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 27-37.
    16. Zhongwei Liang & Tao Zou & Yupeng Zhang & Jinrui Xiao & Xiaochu Liu, 2022. "Sprinkler Drip Infiltration Quality Prediction for Moisture Space Distribution Using RSAE-NPSO," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, May.
    17. Devkota, Krishna Prasad & Yadav, Sudhir & Humphreys, E. & Kumar, Akhilesh & Kumar, Pankaj & Kumar, Virender & Malik, R.K. & Srivastava, Amit K., 2021. "Land gradient and configuration effects on yield, irrigation amount and irrigation water productivity in rice-wheat and maize-wheat cropping systems in Eastern India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Smith, R.J. & Uddin, M.J. & Gillies, M.H., 2018. "Estimating irrigation duration for high performance furrow irrigation on cracking clay soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 78-85.
    19. Akbari, Mahmood & Gheysari, Mahdi & Mostafazadeh-Fard, Behrouz & Shayannejad, Mohammad, 2018. "Surface irrigation simulation-optimization model based on meta-heuristic algorithms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 46-57.
    20. Fadul, E. & Masih, I. & De Fraiture, C. & Suryadi, F.X., 2020. "Irrigation performance under alternative field designs in a spate irrigation system with large field dimensions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422005996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.