IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v262y2022ics0378377421005941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grapevine crop evapotranspiration and crop coefficient forecasting using linear and non-linear multiple regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Ohana-Levi, Noa
  • Ben-Gal, Alon
  • Munitz, Sarel
  • Netzer, Yishai

Abstract

Vineyard irrigation management relies on accurate assessment of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). ETc is affected by the by type of plant, its physiological properties, and meteorological parameters. Rapid measurement of these factors facilitates quantification of ETc and enables skilled decision-making for data-driven irrigation. Our main objective was to quantify the performance of different modeling approaches for forecasting seasonal ETc using meteorological and vegetative data (e.g., leaf area) from five consecutive growing seasons (2013–2017) of Vitis vinifera 'Cabernet Sauvignon' vines. Time series of ETc was acquired from water balance from vines grown in drainage lysimeters within the vineyard. ETc forecasts were generated for each season using twelve regression models: six linear and six non-linear multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) models. Each regression model constituted a unique combination of variables, some relying on crop coefficient (Kc) and others based on direct ETc forecasting. The models were trained using data from four growing seasons and compared via measures of coefficient of determination (R2), residual standard deviation, and coefficient of variation. Each model was then tested using ETc forecasts for a fifth growing season, and compared to the measured ETc values using correlation, root mean squared error (RMSE), and normalized RMSE. Finally, a mean-seasonal rolling RMSE with a window of 7 days was used to assess the accuracy of the different models. The results show a clear advantage to using non-linear modeling for ETc forecasting (average RMSE range of 0.81–1.05 vs. 0.64–0.71 mm day−1, respectively). Furthermore, direct forecasting and Kc-based methods yielded similar results, and all models benefited from the incorporation of leaf area data. Similar outcomes were found for the rolling RMSE analysis, with improved model accuracy credited to the inclusion of leaf area, especially early in the season. Our findings confirm that advanced algorithms promote site-specific and location-oriented irrigation management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ohana-Levi, Noa & Ben-Gal, Alon & Munitz, Sarel & Netzer, Yishai, 2022. "Grapevine crop evapotranspiration and crop coefficient forecasting using linear and non-linear multiple regression models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:262:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421005941
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421005941
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lopez-Urrea, R. & Martin de Santa Olalla, F. & Fabeiro, C. & Moratalla, A., 2006. "Testing evapotranspiration equations using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(1-2), pages 15-26, September.
    2. Zeileis, Achim & Grothendieck, Gabor, 2005. "zoo: S3 Infrastructure for Regular and Irregular Time Series," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 14(i06).
    3. Yamaç, Sevim Seda & Todorovic, Mladen, 2020. "Estimation of daily potato crop evapotranspiration using three different machine learning algorithms and four scenarios of available meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Gavilán, Pedro & Ruiz, Natividad & Lozano, David, 2015. "Daily forecasting of reference and strawberry crop evapotranspiration in greenhouses in a Mediterranean climate based on solar radiation estimates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 307-317.
    5. Ohana-Levi, Noa & Munitz, Sarel & Ben-Gal, Alon & Netzer, Yishai, 2020. "Evaluation of within-season grapevine evapotranspiration patterns and drivers using generalized additive models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Granata, Francesco, 2019. "Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms—A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 303-315.
    7. Montoro, A. & Mañas, F. & López-Urrea, R., 2016. "Transpiration and evaporation of grapevine, two components related to irrigation strategy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 193-200.
    8. Evans, R. G. & Spayd, S. E. & Wample, R. L. & Kroeger, M. W. & Mahan, M. O., 1993. "Water use of Vitis vinifera grapes in Washington," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 109-124, April.
    9. Munitz, Sarel & Schwartz, Amnon & Netzer, Yishai, 2019. "Water consumption, crop coefficient and leaf area relations of a Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon' vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 86-94.
    10. Martínez-Cob, A. & Faci, J.M., 2010. "Evapotranspiration of an hedge-pruned olive orchard in a semiarid area of NE Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 410-418, March.
    11. Kisi, Ozgur, 2016. "Modeling reference evapotranspiration using three different heuristic regression approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 162-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huaiyu Liu & Zhijun Meng & Anqi Zhang & Yue Cong & Xiaofei An & Weiqiang Fu & Guangwei Wu & Yanxin Yin & Chengqian Jin, 2022. "On-Line Detection Method and Device for Moisture Content Measurement of Bales in a Square Baler," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ohana-Levi, Noa & Munitz, Sarel & Ben-Gal, Alon & Netzer, Yishai, 2020. "Evaluation of within-season grapevine evapotranspiration patterns and drivers using generalized additive models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Williams, Larry E. & Levin, Alexander D. & Fidelibus, Matthew W., 2022. "Crop coefficients (Kc) developed from canopy shaded area in California vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    3. Granata, Francesco & Di Nunno, Fabio, 2021. "Forecasting evapotranspiration in different climates using ensembles of recurrent neural networks," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Phon Sheng Hou & Lokman Mohd Fadzil & Selvakumar Manickam & Mahmood A. Al-Shareeda, 2023. "Vector Autoregression Model-Based Forecasting of Reference Evapotranspiration in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Malik, Anurag & Maroufpoor, Saman, 2020. "Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Malik, Anurag & Jamei, Mehdi & Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Karbasi, Masoud & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2022. "Multi-step daily forecasting of reference evapotranspiration for different climates of India: A modern multivariate complementary technique reinforced with ridge regression feature selection," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    7. Roy, Dilip Kumar & Lal, Alvin & Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Saha, Kowshik Kumar & Datta, Bithin, 2021. "Optimization algorithms as training approaches for prediction of reference evapotranspiration using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Munitz, Sarel & Schwartz, Amnon & Netzer, Yishai, 2019. "Water consumption, crop coefficient and leaf area relations of a Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon' vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 86-94.
    9. Erdem Küçüktopcu & Emirhan Cemek & Bilal Cemek & Halis Simsek, 2023. "Hybrid Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Daily Evapotranspiration Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Rallo, G. & Paço, T.A. & Paredes, P. & Puig-Sirera, À. & Massai, R. & Provenzano, G. & Pereira, L.S., 2021. "Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Yamaç, Sevim Seda & Todorovic, Mladen, 2020. "Estimation of daily potato crop evapotranspiration using three different machine learning algorithms and four scenarios of available meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Chehab, Hechmi & Tekaya, Mariem & Mechri, Beligh & Jemai, Abdelmajid & Guiaa, Mohamed & Mahjoub, Zoubeir & Boujnah, Dalenda & Laamari, Salwa & Chihaoui, Badreddine & Zakhama, Houda & Hammami, Mohamed , 2017. "Effect of the Super Absorbent Polymer Stockosorb® on leaf turgor pressure, tree performance and oil quality of olive trees cv. Chemlali grown under field conditions in an arid region of Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 221-231.
    13. Tao, Hai & Diop, Lamine & Bodian, Ansoumana & Djaman, Koffi & Ndiaye, Papa Malick & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2018. "Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with firefly algorithm: Regional case study in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 140-151.
    14. Escarabajal-Henarejos, D. & Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Martínez-Molina, L. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Selection of device to determine temperature gradients for estimating evapotranspiration using energy balance method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 136-147.
    15. Yang, Yang & Cui, Yuanlai & Luo, Yufeng & Lyu, Xinwei & Traore, Seydou & Khan, Shahbaz & Wang, Weiguang, 2016. "Short-term forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using the Penman-Monteith model and public weather forecasts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 329-339.
    16. Malte Willmes & Katherine M Ransom & Levi S Lewis & Christian T Denney & Justin J G Glessner & James A Hobbs, 2018. "IsoFishR: An application for reproducible data reduction and analysis of strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) obtained via laser-ablation MC-ICP-MS," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Siakou, M. & Bruggeman, A. & Eliades, M. & Zoumides, C. & Djuma, H. & Kyriacou, M.C. & Emmanouilidou, M.G. & Spyros, A. & Manolopoulou, E. & Moriana, A., 2021. "Effects of deficit irrigation on ‘Koroneiki’ olive tree growth, physiology and olive oil quality at different harvest dates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    18. Prem B. Parajuli & Priyantha Jayakody & Ying Ouyang, 2018. "Evaluation of Using Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration Data in SWAT," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 985-996, February.
    19. Bouras V. David & Wesseh Wollo, 2020. "Oligopoly Power, Cross-Market Effects and Demand Relatedness: An Empirical Analysis," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6, September.
    20. de Azevedo, Pedro V. & da Silva, Bernardo B. & da Silva, Vicente P. R., 2003. "Water requirements of irrigated mango orchards in northeast Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 241-254, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:262:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421005941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.