IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v180y2020ics0308521x19305669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest fragments and natural vegetation patches within crop fields contribute to higher oilseed rape yields in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Halinski, Rosana
  • Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro
  • dos Santos, Charles Fernando
  • Acosta, André Luis
  • Guidi, Daniel Dornelles
  • Blochtein, Betina

Abstract

Ecosystem services are fundamental to the maintenance of biodiversity, food security, livestock and biofuel production. Here, we analyze the impact of the distance between forest fragments and oilseed crops (Brassica napus) on the crops' yield (kg/ha) and economic value (US$). For crop yield, the total loss field−1 was calculated as the difference between the most lucrative parcel and the least lucrative parcel. Hypothetical models were developed to estimate the potential changes in crop incomes due to progressive replacement of the lowest income crop area(s) by natural vegetation. Our findings demonstrate a significant decrease in the mean number of seeds per silique and in seed production as the distance from forest fragment progressively increases. The productivity loss throughout this gradient may reach up to 2760 kg/ha (i.e. US$804.08). Our models indicate that parcels further than 325 m from forest fragments were poorly pollinated. Our models also demonstrated that farmers could boost their yields if more natural areas (as small as 5%) were included inside crop fields, even though this reduces their arable area. In conclusion, adding small natural patches within crop fields will most likely lead to a higher seed production and successive increases in the economic value of canola crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Halinski, Rosana & Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro & dos Santos, Charles Fernando & Acosta, André Luis & Guidi, Daniel Dornelles & Blochtein, Betina, 2020. "Forest fragments and natural vegetation patches within crop fields contribute to higher oilseed rape yields in Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:180:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19305669
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X19305669
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konietschke, Frank & Placzek, Marius & Schaarschmidt, Frank & Hothorn, Ludwig A., 2015. "nparcomp: An R Software Package for Nonparametric Multiple Comparisons and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 64(i09).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrés A. Salazar & Eduardo C. Arellano & Andrés Muñoz-Sáez & Marcelo D. Miranda & Fabiana Oliveira da Silva & Natalia B. Zielonka & Liam P. Crowther & Vinina Silva-Ferreira & Patricia Oliveira-Rebouc, 2021. "Restoration and Conservation of Priority Areas of Caatinga’s Semi-Arid Forest Remnants Can Support Connectivity within an Agricultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Nascibem, Fábio Gabriel & Da Silva, Ramon Felipe Bicudo & Viveiro, Alessandra Aparecida & Gonçalves Junior, Oswaldo, 2023. "The Role of Private Reserves of Natural Heritage (RPPN) on natural vegetation dynamics in Brazilian biomes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliette Richetin & Giulio Costantini & Marco Perugini & Felix Schönbrodt, 2015. "Should We Stop Looking for a Better Scoring Algorithm for Handling Implicit Association Test Data? Test of the Role of Errors, Extreme Latencies Treatment, Scoring Formula, and Practice Trials on Reli," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Pizarro, E. & Galleguillos, M. & Barría, P. & Callejas, R., 2022. "Irrigation management or climate change ? Which is more important to cope with water shortage in the production of table grape in a Mediterranean context," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    3. Claudia Kedor & Helma Freitag & Lil Meyer-Arndt & Kirsten Wittke & Leif G. Hanitsch & Thomas Zoller & Fridolin Steinbeis & Milan Haffke & Gordon Rudolf & Bettina Heidecker & Thomas Bobbert & Joachim S, 2022. "A prospective observational study of post-COVID-19 chronic fatigue syndrome following the first pandemic wave in Germany and biomarkers associated with symptom severity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Kandianos Emmanouil Sakalidis & Stein Gerrit Paul Menting & Florentina Johanna Hettinga, 2023. "The Role of Cognition and Social Factors in Competition: How Do People with Intellectual Disabilities Respond to Opponents?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Laurent Augusto & Antra Boča, 2022. "Tree functional traits, forest biomass, and tree species diversity interact with site properties to drive forest soil carbon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Jae Hyun Kim & Shinyeong Park & Seung Ho Kim & Eun Ju Lee, 2021. "Long-Term Land Cover Changes in the Western Part of the Korean Demilitarized Zone," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:180:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19305669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.