IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v104y1994i427p1370-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time Preference and Preference Reversal among Experienced Subjects: The Effects of Real Payments

Author

Listed:
  • Bohm, Peter

Abstract

Preference reversal has been frequent in tests with hypothetical, or small real, payoffs concerning lotteries as well as claims redeemable at different future dates. Preference reversal is tested here for the latter case with nontrivial payment levels and subjects likely to deal with decisions of this type. It is found that replacing hypothetical by real-payment tests reduces preference reversal rates from 62 percent to 15 percent for subjects 'predicted' to reverse preferences and that the real overall preference reversal rate (before correcting for response errors) is 19 percent , much lower than in earlier studies. Copyright 1994 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Bohm, Peter, 1994. "Time Preference and Preference Reversal among Experienced Subjects: The Effects of Real Payments," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 104(427), pages 1370-1378, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:104:y:1994:i:427:p:1370-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199411%29104%3A427%3C1370%3ATPAPRA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Etchart-Vincent, Nathalie, 2007. "Expérimentation de laboratoire et économie : contre quelques idées reçues et faux problèmes," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 83(1), pages 91-116, mars.
    2. Takeuchi, Kan, 2011. "Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 456-478, March.
    3. Mathieu Lefebvre & Ferdinand Vieider & Marie Villeval, 2011. "The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 615-641, October.
    4. Yan-Bang Zhou & Qiang Li & Hong-Zhi Liu, 2021. "Visual attention and time preference reversals," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(4), pages 1010-1038, July.
    5. Jeffrey Prince & Daniel Shawhan, 2011. "Is time inconsistency primarily a male problem?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 501-504.
    6. Walton Sumner & Eric Ding & Irene D. Fischer & Michael D. Hagen, 2014. "Methods for Performing Survival Curve Quality-of-Life Assessments," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(6), pages 787-799, August.
    7. Cherry, Todd L. & Shogren, Jason F., 2007. "Rationality crossovers," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 261-277, April.
    8. Walton Sumner II & Robert F. Nease Jr., 2001. "Choice-Matching Preference Reversals in Health Outcome Assessments," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(3), pages 208-218, May.
    9. Berg, Joyce E. & Dickhaut, John W. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2010. "Preference reversals: The impact of truth-revealing monetary incentives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 443-468, March.
    10. Müller, Holger & Benjamin Kroll, Eike & Vogt, Bodo, 2010. "“Fact or artifact? Empirical evidence on the robustness of compromise effects in binding and non-binding choice contextsâ€," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 441-448.
    11. John A. List, 2004. "Young, Selfish and Male: Field evidence of social preferences," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(492), pages 121-149, January.
    12. Kaisa Herne, 1999. "The Effects of Decoy Gambles on Individual Choice," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 2(1), pages 31-40, August.
    13. Holgar Müller & Eike Benjamin Kroll & Bodo Vogt, 2009. "Fact or Artifact Does the compromise effect occur when subjects face real consequences of their choices?," FEMM Working Papers 09009, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    14. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:1010-1038 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:104:y:1994:i:427:p:1370-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.