IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecb/ecbrbu/20200078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does competition among high-frequency traders affect market liquidity?

Author

Listed:
  • Breckenfelder, Johannes

Abstract

When high-frequency trading firms compete, does stock market liquidity deteriorate? I argue that the answer is yes. High-frequency trading competition may impact stock market liquidity via two channels. First, more competition is accompanied by more high-frequency trading and larger trading volumes, which improve market liquidity. Second, more competition may mean that high-frequency traders adapt their trading strategies and engage in more speculative trades, which harms market liquidity. Since these two channels have the opposite effects on market liquidity, it is important to disentangle the effects of competition from those of a mere increase in the number/volume of high-frequency trading transactions. In the analysis, I aim to do precisely this, by using an exogenous event which changed the intensity of high-frequency competition for some stocks but not for others. I find that otherwise similar stocks subject to more high-frequency trading competition become less liquid. JEL Classification: G23, D4

Suggested Citation

  • Breckenfelder, Johannes, 2020. "How does competition among high-frequency traders affect market liquidity?," Research Bulletin, European Central Bank, vol. 78.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecb:ecbrbu:2020:0078:
    Note: 1125999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu//pub/economic-research/resbull/2020/html/ecb.rb201215~210477c6b0.en.html
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu//pub/economic-research/resbull/2020/html/ecb.rb201215~210477c6b0.en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert J. Menkveld & Marius A. Zoican, 2017. "Need for Speed? Exchange Latency and Liquidity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(4), pages 1188-1228.
    2. Chen Yao & Mao Ye, 2018. "Why Trading Speed Matters: A Tale of Queue Rationing under Price Controls," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(6), pages 2157-2183.
    3. Xuan Tao & Andrew Day & Lan Ling & Samuel Drapeau, 2020. "On Detecting Spoofing Strategies in High Frequency Trading," Papers 2009.14818, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    4. Maureen O’Hara & Gideon Saar & Zhuo Zhong, 2019. "Relative Tick Size and the Trading Environment," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 47-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steffen, Viktoria, 2023. "A literature review on extreme price movements with reversal," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marjolein E. Verhulst & Philippe Debie & Stephan Hageboeck & Joost M. E. Pennings & Cornelis Gardebroek & Axel Naumann & Paul van Leeuwen & Andres A. Trujillo‐Barrera & Lorenzo Moneta, 2021. "When two worlds collide: Using particle physics tools to visualize the limit order book," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(11), pages 1715-1734, November.
    2. Xuefeng Gao & Yunhan Wang, 2018. "Optimal Market Making in the Presence of Latency," Papers 1806.05849, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    3. Nicholas Hirschey, 2021. "Do High-Frequency Traders Anticipate Buying and Selling Pressure?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3321-3345, June.
    4. Li, Sida & Wang, Xin & Ye, Mao, 2021. "Who provides liquidity, and when?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 968-980.
    5. Yamada, Masahiro, 2022. "Profitability and liquidity provision of HFTs during large price shocks: Does relative tick size matter?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    6. Albuquerque, Rui & Song, Shiyun & Yao, Chen, 2020. "The price effects of liquidity shocks: A study of the SEC’s tick size experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 700-724.
    7. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Grégoire, Vincent & Zhong, Zhuo, 2019. "Inverted fee structures, tick size, and market quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 141-164.
    8. Conrad, Jennifer & Wahal, Sunil, 2020. "The term structure of liquidity provision," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 239-259.
    9. Sida Li & Xin Wang & Mao Ye, 2019. "Who Provides Liquidity, and When?," NBER Working Papers 25972, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Khairul Zharif Zaharudin & Martin R. Young & Wei‐Huei Hsu, 2022. "High‐frequency trading: Definition, implications, and controversies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 75-107, February.
    11. Xu, Ke, 2023. "High frequency market making during stressed periods," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 379-397.
    12. Breckenfelder, Johannes, 2019. "Competition among high-frequency traders, and market quality," Working Paper Series 2290, European Central Bank.
    13. Yamamoto, Ryuichi, 2020. "Limit order submission risks, order choice, and tick size," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Khapko, Mariana & Zoican, Marius, 2021. "Do speed bumps curb low-latency investment? Evidence from a laboratory market," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    15. Hagströmer, Björn, 2021. "Bias in the effective bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 314-337.
    16. Hautsch, Nikolaus & Scheuch, Christoph & Voigt, Stefan, 2018. "Limits to arbitrage in markets with stochastic settlement latency," CFS Working Paper Series 616, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    17. Xintong Wang & Christopher Hoang & Yevgeniy Vorobeychik & Michael P. Wellman, 2021. "Spoofing the Limit Order Book: A Strategic Agent-Based Analysis," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-43, May.
    18. Bartlett, Robert P. & McCrary, Justin, 2019. "How rigged are stock markets? Evidence from microsecond timestamps," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 37-60.
    19. Zhou, Hao & Kalev, Petko S., 2019. "Algorithmic and high frequency trading in Asia-Pacific, now and the future," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 186-207.
    20. Brolley, Michael & Cimon, David A., 2020. "Order-Flow Segmentation, Liquidity, and Price Discovery: The Role of Latency Delays," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(8), pages 2555-2587, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition; high-frequency trading; high-frequency trading strategies; tick size reform;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecb:ecbrbu:2020:0078:. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Official Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emieude.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.