IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-16-00044.html

The effect of stock market indexing on the asymmetric timeliness of loss recognition

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Young

    (North Dakota State University)

Abstract

This study examines the effect of stock market indexing on the asymmetric timeliness of loss recognition (ATLR) in accounting earnings. I use the annual reconstitution of the Russell 1000 and 2000 Indices as a source of exogenous variation in passive indexing demand. Index assignment is based on a threshold rule; hence, around the threshold, assignment is plausibly random. However, each index is separately value weighted such that firms at the bottom (top) of the Russell 1000 (2000) receive small (large) index weights, thereby causing variation in indexing demand. Using a regression discontinuity design, I show that around the threshold, firms added to the Russell 2000 from the Russell 1000 have lower ATLR than firms that stayed in the Russell 1000. The result contributes to our understanding of how investors affect properties of accounting earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Young, 2017. "The effect of stock market indexing on the asymmetric timeliness of loss recognition," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1768-1780.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-16-00044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2017/Volume37/EB-17-V37-I3-P160.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S.P. Kothari & Karthik Ramanna & Douglas J. Skinner, 2009. "Implications for GAAP from an Analysis of Positive Research in Accounting," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-137, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2010.
    2. Stephen Ryan, 2006. "Identifying Conditional Conservatism," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 511-525.
    3. David S. Lee & Thomas Lemieux, 2010. "Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(2), pages 281-355, June.
    4. Khan, Mozaffar & Watts, Ross L., 2009. "Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2-3), pages 132-150, December.
    5. Yen-Cheng Chang & Harrison Hong & Inessa Liskovich, 2015. "Regression Discontinuity and the Price Effects of Stock Market Indexing," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(1), pages 212-246.
    6. Sebastian Calonico & Matias D. Cattaneo & Rocío Titiunik, 2015. "Optimal Data-Driven Regression Discontinuity Plots," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1753-1769, December.
    7. Ray Ball & Lakshmanan Shivakumar, 2006. "The Role of Accruals in Asymmetrically Timely Gain and Loss Recognition," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 207-242, May.
    8. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769, December.
    9. Kothari, S.P. & Ramanna, Karthik & Skinner, Douglas J., 2010. "Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 246-286, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henry Jarva & Matthijs Lof, 2024. "Identifying accounting conservatism in the presence of skewness," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 553-577, February.
    2. Ettredge, Michael & Huang, Ying & Zhang, Weining, 2012. "Earnings restatements and differential timeliness of accounting conservatism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 489-503.
    3. Wei, Wei & Young, Alex, 2025. "Beyond Russell reconstitution: A re-examination of methodologies for natural experiments," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Paul André & Andrei Filip & Luc Paugam, 2013. "Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Conditional Conservatism in Europe," Working Papers hal-00862683, HAL.
    5. Richard Barker & Anne McGeachin, 2015. "An Analysis of Concepts and Evidence on the Question of Whether IFRS Should be Conservative," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(2), pages 169-207, June.
    6. Ke Na & Ivy Xiying Zhang & Yong Zhang, 2024. "Is conservatism demanded by performance measurement in compensation contracts? Evidence from earnings measures used in bonus formulas," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 809-851, March.
    7. Young, Alex, 2016. "Capital market frictions and conservative reporting: Evidence from short selling constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 227-234.
    8. Li, Keming & Nishikawa, Takeshi & Rao, Ramesh P., 2025. "Does the threat of short selling discipline management? Evidence from default risk changes around regulation SHO," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Araceli Mora & Martin Walker, 2015. "The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 620-650, August.
    10. Akram Khalilov & Beatriz Garcia Osma, 2020. "Accounting conservatism and the profitability of corporate insiders," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3-4), pages 333-364, March.
    11. Paul André & Andrei Filip & Luc Paugam, 2015. "The Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Conditional Conservatism in Europe," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3-4), pages 482-514, April.
    12. repec:hal:journl:hal-00862683 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Richard Zhe Wang, 2013. "This paper empirically tests the relation between a firm’s degree of accounting conservatism and its level of operating risk. This paper constitutes the first empirical study in the accounting literature to test the risk signaling theory of account," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 55-68.
    14. Amneh Alkurdi & Munther Al-Nimer & Mohammad Dabaghia, 2017. "Accounting Conservatism and Ownership Structure Effect: Evidence from Industrial and Financial Jordanian Listed Companies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 608-619.
    15. Tse-Chun Lin & Qi Liu & Bo Sun, 2019. "Contractual Managerial Incentives with Stock Price Feedback," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(7), pages 2446-2468, July.
    16. Kiesewetter, Dirk & Manthey, Johannes, 2017. "The relationship between corporate governance and tax avoidance - evidence from Germany using a regression discontinuity design," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 218, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    17. Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C. & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E. & Voulgaris, Georgios, 2021. "Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    18. Hans B. Christensen & Valeri V. Nikolaev, 2013. "Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 734-775, September.
    19. Leilei Gu & Jinyu Liu & Yuchao Peng, 2022. "Locality Stereotype, CEO Trustworthiness and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 773-797, February.
    20. Frank Heflin & Charles Hsu & Qinglu Jin, 2015. "Accounting conservatism and Street earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 674-709, June.
    21. Likai Chen & Georg Keilbar & Liangjun Su & Weining Wang, 2023. "Inference on many jumps in nonparametric panel regression models," Papers 2312.01162, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-16-00044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.