IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebj/ijpssr/2025v4iia21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Research Bullying on Research Integrity: Causes of ill Research and Production of ill Researchers at University Level

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Samra Afzal
  • Dr. Shazia Zamir
  • Dr. Muhammad Asghar Ali

Abstract

Present research explored bullying in research academic, its impact on research integrity and production of ill researchers and ill research. A qualitative research paradigm with an inductive approach was followed. The reflexive thematic analysis was conducted based on framework given by Braun and Clark (2006). A total of 20 participants were selected, 10 of whom were research supervisors and 10 were supervisees through purposive sampling technique. Results showed that bullying in research academic occurs in forms of conflict of interest, disrespect of supervisee and supervision, distributive injustice, ethical silences, fear of retribution, social injustice, biased behavior, ethical temptations and influencing policies negatively. Causes of compromised research integrity and quality are bullying and research quality, lack of training, external pressures, ethical leadership, power dynamics, quality vs quantity, lack of autonomy, and ethical dilemmas. Furthermore, causes of production of ill research are poorly designed research, ethical violations, lack of ethical considerations, lack of objectivity and bias, time constraints, lack of practical implications and societal needs. Results also revealed that causes of production of ill researchers are research slaves, irresponsible attitude towards research, dishonest conduct, lack of teamwork, disregard for ethical standards, rigid behavior and focus on quantity. Research implications include desirable research practices, international collaboration, mentoring, support for publication and publication interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Samra Afzal & Dr. Shazia Zamir & Dr. Muhammad Asghar Ali, 2025. "Impact of Research Bullying on Research Integrity: Causes of ill Research and Production of ill Researchers at University Level," International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review (IJPSSR), International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review (IJPSSR), vol. 4(I), pages 221-234.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebj:ijpssr:2025v4iia21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.ijpssr.org.pk/index.php/ijpssr/article/download/129/101/1076
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gowri Gopalakrishna & Gerben ter Riet & Gerko Vink & Ineke Stoop & Jelte M Wicherts & Lex M Bouter, 2022. "Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Brian C. Martinson & Melissa S. Anderson & Raymond de Vries, 2005. "Scientists behaving badly," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7043), pages 737-738, June.
    3. Esmita Charani & Seye Abimbola & Madhukar Pai & Olusoji Adeyi & Marc Mendelson & Ramanan Laxminarayan & Muneera A Rasheed, 2022. "Funders: The missing link in equitable global health research?," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(6), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:metaar:s4b65_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mads Paludan Goddiksen & Mikkel Willum Johansen & Anna Catharina Armond & Christine Clavien & Linda Hogan & Nóra Kovács & Marcus Tang Merit & I Anna S Olsson & Una Quinn & Júlio Borlido Santos & Rita , 2023. "“The person in power told me to”—European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Adeola Abdulateef Elega, 2023. "‘I will have a problem with graduating if I don’t include her name’: exploring the ethical dilemma of PhD candidates in the issue of scientific gift," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 5177-5192, December.
    4. Kiran Sharma, 2021. "Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8363-8374, October.
    5. Daniele Fanelli, 2010. "Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-7, April.
    6. Valérie Orozco & Christophe Bontemps & Élise Maigné & Virginie Piguet & Annie Hofstetter & Anne Marie Lacroix & Fabrice Levert & Jean-Marc Rousselle, 2017. "How to make a pie? Reproducible Research for Empirical Economics & Econometrics," Post-Print hal-01939942, HAL.
    7. Sarstedt, Marko & Adler, Susanne J., 2023. "An advanced method to streamline p-hacking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Glenna, Leland & Bruce, Analena, 2021. "Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    9. repec:plo:pctr00:0010001 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Felix Holzmeister & Magnus Johannesson & Robert Böhm & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implications," Working Papers 2023-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    11. Bruno S. Frey, 2010. "Withering academia?," IEW - Working Papers 512, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    12. Julia Heuritsch, 2023. "Reflecting on motivations: How reasons to publish affect research behaviour in astronomy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Matthias Fink & Johannes Gartner & Rainer Harms & Isabella Hatak, 2023. "Ethical Orientation and Research Misconduct Among Business Researchers Under the Condition of Autonomy and Competition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 619-636, March.
    14. Marek Deja, 2025. "The causal effect of the global crisis on open science research impact: a bibliometric causal analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 1303-1325, February.
    15. Valérie Orozco & Christophe Bontemps & Elise Maigné & Virginie Piguet & Annie Hofstetter & Anne Lacroix & Fabrice Levert & Jean‐Marc Rousselle, 2020. "How To Make A Pie: Reproducible Research For Empirical Economics And Econometrics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 1134-1169, December.
    16. Rogge, Jan-Christoph, 2015. "Soziale Bedingungen und Effekte der quantitativen Leistungsmessung: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von jungen Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 66(2), pages 205-214.
    17. Julia Heuritsch, 2021. "Reflexive Behaviour: How Publication Pressure Affects Research Quality in Astronomy," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, November.
    18. María Núñez-Núñez & Naomi Cano-Ibáñez & Javier Zamora & Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas & Khalid Saeed Khan, 2023. "Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Breuer Matthias, 2025. "Another Way Forward: Comments on Ohlson’s Critique of Empirical Accounting Research," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 123-139.
    20. Anna Abalkina, 2021. "Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 7123-7148, August.
    21. Moritz A. Drupp & Menusch Khadjavi & Rudi Voss, 2024. "The Truth-Telling of Truth-Seekers: Evidence from Online Experiments with Scientists," CESifo Working Paper Series 10897, CESifo.
    22. Mariano Sana & Alexander A. Weinreb, 2008. "Insiders, Outsiders, and the Editing of Inconsistent Survey Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 36(4), pages 515-541, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebj:ijpssr:2025v4iia21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hazrat Bilal (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ijpssr.org.pk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.