IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebj/ijpssr/2024v3iiiia17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Approaches at Primary Level: An Analysis of the Efficacy of Home Work

Author

Listed:
  • Shaheen Akhtar
  • Dr. Saqib Shahzad
  • Dr. Muhammad Sohail
  • Azmat Ali Shah

Abstract

This study's primary goal was to investigate the efficacy of elementary school homework strategies. The whole study sample consisted of instructors and fifth-grade students in the Nowshera district. The research was conducted using a survey research design. Using a stratified random sampling procedure, the sample was chosen. Of the 400 participants in the sample, 288 were parents, and 112 were primary school instructors from both government and private institutions. A self-made survey instrument was created to gather information. SPSS was used to examine the data. The results showed that homework strategy had a beneficial impact on students' academic progress with (β =.56, p.001).The study discovered no distinction in perception between instructors and parents. The overall study found that students' academic attainment was better when they used a homework-based study strategy than when they didn't.07). It was recommended that research may be carried out in other districts and provinces. The opinions of instructors and parents were investigated in this study. Research may be conducted to find out how students feel about homework efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaheen Akhtar & Dr. Saqib Shahzad & Dr. Muhammad Sohail & Azmat Ali Shah, 2024. "Learning Approaches at Primary Level: An Analysis of the Efficacy of Home Work," International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review (IJPSSR), International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review (IJPSSR), vol. 3(III), pages 166-173.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebj:ijpssr:2024v3iiiia17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.ijpssr.org.pk/index.php/ijpssr/article/download/57/44/474
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Al-Bahrani & Maria Apostolova-Mihaylova & Emily C. Marshall, 2022. "Helping some and harming others: Homework frequency and tradeoffs in student performance," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 197-209, June.
    2. Linda Dynan & Tom Cate, 2009. "The Impact of Writing Assignments on Student Learning: Should Writing Assignments Be Structured or Unstructured?," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(1), pages 64-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natsuka Tokumaru, 2024. "Reality-oriented critical learning using the CORE in introductory economics courses: cognitive engagement and economic literacy," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 97-113, April.
    2. Caroline Elliott & Vudayagi Balasubramanyam, 2016. "Assessing students: Real-world analyses underpinned by economic theory," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1151171-115, December.
    3. Grogan, Kelly A., 2017. "Will this be on the test? How exam structure affects perceptions of innovative assignments in a masters of science microeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Hall, Joshua C. & Podemska-Mikluch, Marta, 2015. "Teaching the economic way of thinking through Op-eds," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 13-21.
    5. Paul Dalziel, 2011. "Schumpeter's 'Vision' and the Teaching of Principles of Economics to Resource Students," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 10(2), pages 63-74.
    6. Green, Alan, 2024. "Are we doing homework wrong? The marginal effect of homework using spaced repetition," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    7. Kristin Stowe, 2010. "A Quick Argument for Active Learning: The Effectiveness of One-Minute Papers," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 10(1), pages 33-39, Summer.
    8. Raboy, David G., 2017. "An introductory microeconomics in-class experiment to reinforce the marginal utility/price maximization rule and the integration of modern theory," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 36-49.
    9. Elizabeth Perry-Sizemore & Steven A. Greenlaw, 2011. "Writing for Learning in Economics," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebj:ijpssr:2024v3iiiia17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hazrat Bilal (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ijpssr.org.pk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.