Dynamic Efficiency Measurement
A philosophical problem for studies of inefficiency of firms is how to rationalise the inefficiency. Since economists do not have any theory for inefficiency, explaining the results of efficiency analyses are notoriously more difficult than carrying out the estimations. The literature points to measures of inputs and management as not including quality dimensions as a reason for measured efficiency differences, indicating that more work needs to be done on data collection. Strategic behaviour in game situations between owners and management, and between management and labour may also show up as inefficiencies. Another reason is technology differences. The frontier production function is the key to information on best-practice technology. Estimation of efficiency is usually done for units observed during the same time period, thus in this respect the measures are static. Interpretations of dynamic efficiency measurement are offered. The vintage model of substitutability between inputs including capital before investment, but no substitution possibilities after investment, and ex-post production possibilities characterised by fixed input coefficients, can rationalise inefficiency due to technology differences. Key elements in understanding structural change are the entering of capacity embodying new technology and exiting of capacity no longer able to yield positive quasi-rent. Three crucial production function concepts are identified: the ex-ante micro unit production function as relevant when investing in new capacity, the ex-post micro production function, and the short-run industry production function giving the production possibilities at the industry level. Productivity measurement, taking these types of production functions into consideration, leads to different interpretations of productivity change than traditional approaches not being clear about which production function concept is used.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 45 (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 91-11-2766-6533/34/35, 2766-6703/04/05
Web page: http://www.ierdse.org/Email:
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.ierdse.org/ Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dse:indecr:0025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Pami Dua)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.