IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/83-4-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zwischen Ökonomisierungsangst und Wachstumseurophorie: zur Governance der Arbeit im Pflegesektor

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Evans
  • Günter Thiele
  • Kai Ziegler
  • Franziska Risthaus

Abstract

Discussions concerning the future of employment in the care sector currently paint a contradictory picture. Whereas on the one hand the prospects for growth and employment are emphasized, there is on the other hand a growing concern in the face of an increasing economization and insecurity in care work. This paper reflects upon these findings against the background of the institutional arrangements for industrial relations from the standpoint of employer’s organizations in the care sector. Generally the uniform, branch-wide representation and negotiation structures of the organized social partners within industry are an important impulse to ensure that the competition of providers is predominantly conducted on the basis of the price and quality of their respective products and services. Competition amongst providers at the cost of working standards and employment conditions is as such effectively contained. In contrast, the fragmented structures, logics of action and routines of the organized social partners in the care sector promote a downward spiral in respect of the standards for working conditions and remuneration levels. On this basis, the economization of care work can be interpreted as a direct result of the organized powerlessness in the field of industrial relations. Paradoxically, this “crisis” could pave the way for new institutional arrangements and a reorganization of social partnerships in the care sector. Diskurse zur Zukunft der Arbeit im Pflegesektor zeichnen derzeit ein widersprüchliches Bild. Einerseits werden Wachstums- und Beschäftigungsperspektiven betont, andererseits wächst die Sorge um eine weitere Ökonomisierung und Prekarisierung von Pflegearbeit. Der vorliegende Beitrag reflektiert diesen Diskurs vor dem Hintergrund der institutionellen Arrangements der Arbeitsbeziehungen aus der Perspektive von Arbeitgeberorganisationen im Pflegesektor. Normalerweise sind einheitliche und branchenweite Repräsentations- und Verhandlungsstrukturen der organisierten Sozialpartner in der Wirtschaft ein wichtiger Impuls dafür, dass Anbietervorwiegend über Preise oder die Qualität ihrer Produkte und Dienstleistungen konkurrieren. Eine Konkurrenz der Anbieter zu Lasten der Arbeits- und Beschäftigungsbedingungen kann so eingedämmt werden. Die fragmentierten Strukturen, Handlungslogiken und -routinen der organisierten Sozialpartner im Pflegesektor befördern demgegenüber eine Abwärtsspirale hinsichtlich der Standards von Arbeitsbedingungen und Entgelten. Hiervon ausgehend kann die Ökonomisierung der Pflegearbeit als Ergebnis organisierter Machtlosigkeit in den überbetrieblichen Arbeitsbeziehungen interpretiert werden. Paradoxerweise könnte diese „Krise“ jedoch den Weg für neue institutionelle Arrangements und eine Re- Organisation der Sozialpartnerschaft im Pflegesektor bereiten.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Evans & Günter Thiele & Kai Ziegler & Franziska Risthaus, 2014. "Zwischen Ökonomisierungsangst und Wachstumseurophorie: zur Governance der Arbeit im Pflegesektor," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(4), pages 123-136.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:83-4-8
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.83.4.123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.83.4.123
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.83.4.123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bräutigam, Christoph & Dahlbeck, Elke & Enste, Peter & Evans, Michaela & Hilbert, Josef, 2010. "Flexibilisierung und Leiharbeit in der Pflege," Arbeitspapiere 215, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schulten, Thorsten & Schulze-Buschoff, Karin, 2015. "Sector-level strategies against precarious employment in Germany: Evidence from construction, commercial cleaning, hospitals and temporary agency work," WSI Working Papers 197, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Wiethölter, Doris & Carstensen, Jeanette & Bogai, Dieter, 2013. "Die Gesundheitswirtschaft in Berlin-Brandenburg," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Berlin-Brandenburg 201301, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Welfare Economic; Health Care Market; economization and insecurity; employer‘sorganizations; industrial relations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • J53 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Labor-Management Relations; Industrial Jurisprudence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:83-4-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.