IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gendered adolescent time use in Japan, Korea, Finland, and the United Kingdom across three decades

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Chang

    (University of Oxford)

  • Man-Yee Kan

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about gendered adolescent time allocation across East Asian and Western contexts across time. East Asian societies have distinct Confucian-based parenting practices and time use. Examining these contexts helps us understand factors contributing to adult gender inequality and the levels of universalisation or divergence in time patterns. Methods: Using harmonised time diaries, we examine the gendered differences in time spent on sleep/personal care, education, TV/radio, general leisure, sports/exercise, and domestic work in South Korea, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Finland across three decades (1985–1990, 1991–2000, 2001–2010). Results: There are minimal gender gaps in sleep/personal care and education. Globally, girls spend more time on domestic work, and there is a rise in general leisure across decades, but gender gaps have not narrowed across time. Gender gaps in East Asia are most pronounced in sports/exercise and leisure, but gender gaps in domestic work are larger in Western societies. Over time, the gender gaps in East Asia remain stable, showing slower progress than in Western contexts. Conclusions: Across contexts, gender gaps are smallest in ‘essential’ activities, but there are distinct gender gaps in East Asian and Western contexts. The persistent gender gaps in East Asia across time reflect persistent adult gender inequality, but we find that gender gaps are not necessarily smaller in more gender-equal societies. Contribution: We contribute findings about adolescents’ time use in East Asian and Western contexts, which is rarely studied due to data limitations. We also extend previous work by using contexts over three decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Chang & Man-Yee Kan, 2025. "Gendered adolescent time use in Japan, Korea, Finland, and the United Kingdom across three decades," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(17), pages 511-524.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:17
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/17/53-17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.17?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ekaterina Hertog & Muzhi Zhou, 2021. "Japanese adolescents' time use: The role of household income and parental education," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(9), pages 225-238.
    2. Jaejin Ahn & Joan P. Yoo, 2022. "Patterns of Time Use among 12-Year-Old Children and Their Life Satisfaction: A Gender and Cross-Country Comparison," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(5), pages 1693-1717, October.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0157805 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Man-Yee Kan & Ekaterina Hertog, 2017. "Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(18), pages 557-588.
    5. Eunho Cha & Joan P. Yoo, 2024. "Children’s Time Use Patterns and Subjective Well-being in Asian Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 445-481, February.
    6. Rees, Gwyther, 2017. "Children's activities and time use: Variations between and within 16 countries," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 78-87.
    7. Frances Goldscheider & Eva Bernhardt & Trude Lappegård, 2015. "The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 207-239, June.
    8. Joan García Román & Pablo Gracia, 2022. "Gender differences in time use across age groups: A study of ten industrialized countries, 2005–2015," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara S. Okun & Liat Raz‐Yurovich, 2019. "Housework, Gender Role Attitudes, and Couples' Fertility Intentions: Reconsidering Men's Roles in Gender Theories of Family Change," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 169-196, March.
    2. Man-Yee Kan & Ekaterina Hertog & Kamila Kolpashnikova, 2019. "Housework share and fertility preference in four East Asian countries in 2006 and 2012," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(35), pages 1021-1046.
    3. Eunho Cha & Joan P. Yoo, 2024. "Children’s Time Use Patterns and Subjective Well-being in Asian Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 445-481, February.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:9qmrk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ansgar Hudde, 2018. "Societal Agreement on Gender Role Attitudes and Childlessness in 38 Countries," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(5), pages 745-767, December.
    6. Erin Hye-Won Kim, 2017. "Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(24), pages 743-768.
    7. Victor Leocádio & Ana Paula Verona & Simone Wajnman, 2025. "A review of research of the relationship between gender equity and fertility in low-fertility settings," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Gracia, Pablo, 2023. "Child and Adolescent Time Use and Well-Being: A Study of Current Debates and Empirical Evidence," OSF Preprints 9qmrk, Center for Open Science.
    9. Zhiyun Li & Hualei Yang & Xianchen Zhu & Lin Xie, 2021. "A Multilevel Study of the Impact of Egalitarian Attitudes Toward Gender Roles on Fertility Desires in China," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(4), pages 747-769, August.
    10. Liat Raz-Yurovich & Barbara S. Okun, 2024. "Are highly educated partners really more gender egalitarian? A couple-level analysis of social class differentials in attitudes and behaviors," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 50(34), pages 1005-1038.
    11. Anna Baranowska-Rataj & Anna Matysiak, 2016. "The Causal Effects of the Number of Children on Female Employment - Do European Institutional and Gender Conditions Matter?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 343-367, September.
    12. Lisa Van Landschoot & Helga de Valk & Jan Van Bavel, 2017. "Fertility among descendants of immigrants in Belgium: The role of the partner," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(60), pages 1827-1858.
    13. Héctor Bellido & Miriam Marcén, 2019. "Fertility and the business cycle: the European case," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1289-1319, December.
    14. Chen, Nana & Xu, Hangtian, 2021. "Why has the birth rate relatively increased in China's wealthy cities?," MPRA Paper 105960, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Giyeon Seo & Tanya Koropeckyj‐Cox & Sanghag Kim, 2022. "Correlates of Contemporary Gender Preference for Children in South Korea," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(1), pages 161-188, March.
    16. Rodríguez-González, Ana, 2021. "The Impact of the Female Advantage in Education on the Marriage Market," Working Papers 2021:5, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:9shup_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Zuzanna Brzozowska & Eva Beaujouan & Kryštof Zeman, 2022. "Is Two Still Best? Change in Parity-Specific Fertility Across Education in Low-Fertility Countries," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(5), pages 2085-2114, October.
    19. Jolene Tan, 2023. "Perceptions towards pronatalist policies in Singapore," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Alessandra Trimarchi & Jan Van Bavel, 2017. "Pathways to marital and non-marital first birth: the role of his and her education," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 15(1), pages 143-179.
    21. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:883-900 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Leen Marynissen & Eleonora Mussino & Jonas Wood & Ann-Zofie Duvander, 2019. "Fathers’ Parental Leave Uptake in Belgium and Sweden: Self-Evident or Subject to Employment Characteristics?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-21, November.
    23. Elena Bastianelli & Daniele Vignoli, 2021. "Instability of Employment Careers and Union Dissolution. A Complex Micro-level Relation," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2021_04, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.