IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2025i3p224-231.html

Economic Efficiency of the Channel Mix in the e-Commerce of Romanian Local and 3D Printed Products

Author

Listed:
  • Razvan Stefan Stan

    („Constantin Brâncuși” University of Targu Jiu, Romania)

  • Ecaterina Mihalceanu (Stan)

    („Constantin Brâncuși” University of Targu Jiu, Romania)

Abstract

Local and 3D-printed products face the dual challenge of embodying cultural or creative value while competing in increasingly globalized and digital marketplaces. This paper investigates the most economically advantageous channels for Romanian makers to promote such products internationally. Using official statistics from Eurostat, UNCTAD, ITC/UN Comtrade, Etsy investor relations, Shopify, Amazon Handmade, MyMiniFactory, and TikTok Shop, we benchmark the relative benefits and risks of marketplaces, proprietary stores, and social commerce. The analysis shows that a hybrid, multi-channel mix, combining discovery platforms such as Etsy or MyMiniFactory with scalable infrastructures like Amazon Handmade, proprietary Shopify stores, and social-commerce channels such as TikTok Shop offers the highest economic efficiency for Romanian makers. This combination maximizes exposure while preserving margins and brand control. The findings suggest that coordinated national and EU support for digital skills and cross-border logistics would further enhance the competitiveness of Romanian local and 3D-printed products.

Suggested Citation

  • Razvan Stefan Stan & Ecaterina Mihalceanu (Stan), 2025. "Economic Efficiency of the Channel Mix in the e-Commerce of Romanian Local and 3D Printed Products," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 224-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2025:i:3:p:224-231
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2025_3/Mihalceanu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felipe Cerdas & Max Juraschek & Sebastian Thiede & Christoph Herrmann, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of 3D Printed Products in a Distributed Manufacturing System," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 80-93, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asghari, M. & Afshari, H. & Jaber, M.Y. & Searcy, C., 2024. "Learning and forgetting interactions within a collaborative human-centric manufacturing network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 977-991.
    2. Biman Darshana Hettiarachchi & Stefan Seuring & Marcus Brandenburg, 2022. "Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 858-878, December.
    3. Joana R. Gouveia & Sara M. Pinto & Sara Campos & João R. Matos & Catarina Costa & Thiago Assis Dutra & Sílvia Esteves & Luís Oliveira, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Circularity Case Study Using Additive Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-44, August.
    4. Farrukh, Clare & Holgado, Maria, 2020. "Integrating sustainable value thinking into technology forecasting: A configurable toolset for early stage technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Muhammad Saad Amjad & Nancy Diaz-Elsayed, 2024. "Smart and sustainable urban manufacturing for a circular economy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31789-31815, December.
    6. Colin Reiff & Matthias Buser & Thomas Betten & Volkher Onuseit & Max Hoßfeld & Daniel Wehner & Oliver Riedel, 2021. "A Process-Planning Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Oliver Kunze & Fabian Frommer, 2021. "The Matrix vs. The Fifth Element—Assessing Future Scenarios of Urban Transport from a Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Luis M. Camarinha-Matos & Andre Dionisio Rocha & Paula Graça, 2024. "Collaborative approaches in sustainable and resilient manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 499-519, February.
    9. Simonetto, Marco & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Battini, Daria & Govindan, Kannan, 2022. "Closed loop supply chains 4.0: From risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    10. Hettiarachchi, Biman Darshana & Brandenburg, Marcus & Seuring, Stefan, 2022. "Connecting additive manufacturing to circular economy implementation strategies: Links, contingencies and causal loops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    11. Núñez-Merino, Miguel & Maqueira-Marín, Juan Manuel & Moyano-Fuentes, José & Castaño-Moraga, Carlos Alberto, 2022. "Industry 4.0 and supply chain. A Systematic Science Mapping analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    12. Matt Sinclair & Leila Sheldrick & Mariale Moreno & Emma Dewberry, 2018. "Consumer Intervention Mapping—A Tool for Designing Future Product Strategies within Circular Product Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2025:i:3:p:224-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.