IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dat/bmngmt/y2021i3p5-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private Sector Management Tools In The Public Sector: Illustrative Evidence Of Literature From Australian Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Anup Chowdhury

    (East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh)

  • Nikhil Chandra Shil

    (East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Public sector reform processes have brought a wide range of improvements in many areas of public service delivery. This study explores the reforms activities initiated by Australian public sector organizations in the context of new public management ideals. New public management ideals believe that management in the public sector is not different from management in the private sector. Since 1980s the Australian public sector has been dominated by the new public management principles as a response to reform initiatives and eventually different private sector management practices have been introduced in public sector. Literature supports that the Australian public sector organizations have changed their structure and operation in line with the private sector to achieve cost-efficiency, budget accountability and an improved customer focus in service delivery. However, this study doesn’t intent to generalize any findings rather highlights a summary based on available literature. Though the context of the present research is Australia, it may be equally useful to every policy maker who are engaged in formulating new policies for respective public sector. Moreover, the findings reported in this study would be useful to the public sector managers in their day to day decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2021. "Private Sector Management Tools In The Public Sector: Illustrative Evidence Of Literature From Australian Public Sector," Business Management, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 5-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:dat:bmngmt:y:2021:i:3:p:5-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10610/4572
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jane Broadbent & James Guthrie, 1992. "Changes in the Public Sector: A Review of Recent “Alternative” Accounting Research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 1-1, June.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579810239837 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Hoque, Zahirul, 2005. "Securing institutional legitimacy or organizational effectiveness? A case examining the impact of public sector reform initiatives in an Australian local authority," Working Papers aef_2005_10, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    4. Tarek Rana & Zahirul Hoque & Kerry Jacobs, 2019. "Public sector reform implications for performance measurement and risk management practice: insights from Australia," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 37-45, January.
    5. Carly Webster & Zahirul Hoque, 2005. "Cost Information in the New Public-Sector Environment: Cost Accounting Change in a State-Owned Hospital," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(37), pages 47-54, November.
    6. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579210011835 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Christine Ryan, 1998. "The introduction of accrual reporting policy in the Australian public sector," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(5), pages 518-539, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2017. "Public Sector Reforms and New Public Management: Exploratory Evidence from Australian Public Sector," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Maria del Rocio Moreno-Enguix & Ester Gras-Gil & Joaquin Hernandez-Fernandez, 2017. "An Explanation of Management of Local Governments in Spain Based on the Structure of the Internal Control System," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 18(2), pages 393-410, November.
    4. Jeanette Van Akkeren, 2012. "United we stand, divided we fall: the failure of an accounting information system in a major radiology provider," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 61-68, January.
    5. Zhang, Eagle, 2024. "Accounting and statecraft in China: Accrual accounting for effective government rather than efficient market," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Agathe Morinière, 2023. "Ethical Implications of Acceleration: Perspectives From Health Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 741-758, December.
    7. Goddard, Andrew & Assad, Mussa & Issa, Siasa & Malagila, John & Mkasiwa, Tausi A., 2016. "The two publics and institutional theory – A study of public sector accounting in Tanzania," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 8-25.
    8. Frank H.M. Verbeeten, 2008. "Performance management practices in public sector organizations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 427-454, March.
    9. Joanne Lye & Zahirul Hoque & Lee Parker, 2021. "How do employees learn from performance measures? Evidence from a local government entity," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3443-3480, June.
    10. Manzurul Alam & Zahirul Hoque, 2021. "Boundary management and accounting visibility in social services: a case study," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5377-5401, December.
    11. Helen Irvine, 2011. "From go to woe," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(7), pages 824-847, September.
    12. Kevin Baird, 2007. "Adoption of activity management practices in public sector organizations," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(4), pages 551-569, December.
    13. Martin R. W. Hiebl, 2024. "The integration of risk into management control systems: towards a deeper understanding across multiple levels of analysis," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2016. "Innovation in Public Sector Management Control Systems in the Context of New Public Management: A Case of an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 99-125.
    15. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2019. "Influence of New Public Management Philosophy On Risk Management, Fraud and Corruption Control and Internal Audit: Evidence from an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 486-508, December.
    16. Rana, Tarek & Cordery, Carolyn J., 2024. "Digitalization as a form of marketization: The performativity of calculative practices in framing and overflowing NGO performance and accountability," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    17. Rana, Tarek & Hoque, Zahirul, 2020. "Institutionalising multiple accountability logics in public services: Insights from Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    18. Luca Papi & Riccardo Ievoli & Giorgia Gobbo & Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Lamberto Manzoli, 2021. "Performance governance per la generazione di Valore Pubblico in sanit?. Evidenze empiriche dalle aziende sanitarie dell?Emilia-Romagna," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(117), pages 27-58.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Private Sector Management; Public Sector; New Public Management; Australian Public Sector;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dat:bmngmt:y:2021:i:3:p:5-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostadin Bashev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsenobg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.