IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v18y2012i04p430-444_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of mission statements in organizations – A review

Author

Listed:
  • Braun, Susanne
  • Wesche, Jenny S
  • Frey, Dieter
  • Weisweiler, Silke
  • Peus, Claudia

Abstract

Even though mission statements are standard tools in organizations, their effectiveness is subject to substantial skepticism. This review integrates hitherto published research based on a broad range of objective and subjective effectiveness criteria above and beyond financial performance in for-profit as well as not-for-profit organizations. We conclude that the distal outcome effectiveness of mission statements depends on the following antecedents and intermediate outcomes: (1) the rationale underlying their development; (2) the process of their development and implementation; (3) their content and form; and (4) individual attitudes toward the mission statement. We thereby clarify preconditions of mission statement effectiveness in organizations, and reveal shortcomings in current research.

Suggested Citation

  • Braun, Susanne & Wesche, Jenny S & Frey, Dieter & Weisweiler, Silke & Peus, Claudia, 2012. "Effectiveness of mission statements in organizations – A review," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 430-444, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:18:y:2012:i:04:p:430-444_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367200000687/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Saah, 2022. "Critical Factors for the Successful Implementation of a Strategic Business Plan among Small and Medium Size Enterprises," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 19-28, July.
    2. Lin, Yi-Hsin & Lin, Feng-Jyh & Wang, Kuo-Hsiung, 2021. "The effect of social mission on service quality and brand image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 744-752.
    3. Diego F. Téllez & Jesús M. Godoy, 2017. "Mission Power and Firm Financial Performance," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 15655, Universidad EAFIT.
    4. Giorgio Mion & Cristian Rolando Loza Adaui & Angelo Bonfanti, 2021. "Characterizing the mission statements of benefit corporations: Empirical evidence from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2160-2172, May.
    5. Mion, Giorgio & Loza Adaui, Cristian R. & Bonfanti, Angelo & De Crescenzo, Veronica, 2023. "Mission statements and financial and sustainability performance: An exploratory study of Benefit Corporations certified as B Corps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Valentina A. Bali & Devin Higgins, 2023. "More than Meets the Eye? Using Text Analytic Techniques to Unpack School Mission Statements," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    7. Chijioke Nwachukwu & Pavel Žufan, 2017. "Influence of Customer Focused Mission Statement on Customer Satisfaction," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(3), pages 1031-1038.
    8. Michelle Shumate & Jiawei Sophia Fu & Katherine R. Cooper, 2018. "Does Cross-Sector Collaboration Lead to Higher Nonprofit Capacity?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 385-399, June.
    9. Riff Raymond Guia & Carlos Eduardo Legaspi Jr, 2023. "Practice of Lasallian values and leadership skills of Lay Administrators in Lasallian Educational Institutions," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 189-204, May.
    10. TOH Seong-Yuen & KOON Vui-Yee, 2017. "Determining Mission Statement Effectiveness From A Fit Perspective," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 220-240, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:18:y:2012:i:04:p:430-444_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.