IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v114y2020i3p856-873_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Opinion and Foreign Electoral Intervention

Author

Listed:
  • TOMZ, MICHAEL
  • WEEKS, JESSICA L. P.

Abstract

Foreign electoral intervention is an increasingly important tool for influencing politics in other countries, yet we know little about when citizens would tolerate or condemn foreign efforts to sway elections. In this article, we use experiments to study American public reactions to revelations of foreign electoral intervention. We find that even modest forms of intervention polarize the public along partisan lines. Americans are more likely to condemn foreign involvement, lose faith in democracy, and seek retaliation when a foreign power sides with the opposition, than when a foreign power aids their own party. At the same time, Americans reject military responses to electoral attacks on the United States, even when their own political party is targeted. Our findings suggest that electoral interference can divide and weaken an adversary without provoking the level of public demand for retaliation typically triggered by conventional military attacks.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomz, Michael & Weeks, Jessica L. P., 2020. "Public Opinion and Foreign Electoral Intervention," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(3), pages 856-873, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:114:y:2020:i:3:p:856-873_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055420000064/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tabellini, Marco & Fouka, Vasiliki, 2020. "Changing In-Group Boundaries: The Effect of Immigration on Race Relations in the US," CEPR Discussion Papers 14590, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Clareta Treger, 2023. "When do people accept government paternalism? Theory and experimental evidence," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 195-214, January.
    3. Sara Wallace Goodman, 2022. "“Good Citizens†in Democratic Hard Times," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 699(1), pages 68-78, January.
    4. Thai Hung, Ngo & Nguyen, Linh Thi My & Vinh Vo, Xuan, 2022. "Exchange rate volatility connectedness during Covid-19 outbreak: DECO-GARCH and Transfer Entropy approaches," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Ryan Brutger & Stephen Chaudoin & Max Kagan, 2023. "Trade Wars and Election Interference," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Fouka, Vasiliki & Tabellini, Marco, 2021. "Changing Ingroup Boundaries: The Effect of Immigration on Race Relations in the US," IZA Discussion Papers 14311, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Thomas Url, 2021. "Privatversicherungswirtschaft bewies in der COVID-19-Krise Leistungsfähigkeit," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(9), pages 637-649, September.
    8. Colbert, Stephanie & Wilkinson, Claire & Thornton, Louise & Feng, Xiaoqi & Richmond, Robyn, 2021. "Online alcohol sales and home delivery: An international policy review and systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(9), pages 1222-1237.
    9. Faaza Fakhrunnas & Rindang Nuri Isnaini Nugrohowati & Razali Haron & MB Hendrie Anto, 2023. "The Asymmetric Relationship Between Macroeconomic Determinants And Nonperforming Loans: Evidence From The Banking Industry Of Indonesia," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 26(1), pages 145-174, March.
    10. Tumilara Busayo Amoo & Baukje de Roos, 2021. "Stunting and Its Risk Factors in Under Age Five Children in Ogun State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study," International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 7(4), pages 76-86, 10-2021.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:114:y:2020:i:3:p:856-873_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.