IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v41y2012i03p377-390_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Impact of Bt Corn Adoption by U.S. Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge
  • Wechsler, Seth

Abstract

This study examines the impact of adopting Bt corn on farm profits, yields, and insecticide use. The study employs an econometric model that corrects for self-selection and simultaneity. The model is estimated using nationwide farm-level survey data for 2005. Regression analysis confirms that Bt adoption is associated with increased variable profits, yields, and seed demand. However, the results of this analysis suggest that Bt adoption is not significantly related to insecticide use. This result may be due to the fact that insect infestation levels were lower in 2005 than they were in previous years.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Wechsler, Seth, 2012. "Revisiting the Impact of Bt Corn Adoption by U.S. Farmers," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 377-390, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:41:y:2012:i:03:p:377-390_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280500001337/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaffine, Daniel T., 2019. "Microclimate effects of wind farms on local crop yields," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 159-173.
    2. Sung, Jae-hoon & Miranowski, John A., 2016. "Information technologies and field-level chemical use for corn production," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235858, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Petra Moser & Joerg Ohmstedt & Paul W. Rhode, 2018. "Patent Citations—An Analysis of Quality Differences and Citing Practices in Hybrid Corn," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1926-1940, April.
    4. Perry, Edward D. & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2020. "Neonicotinoids in U.S. maize: Insecticide substitution effects and environmental risk," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Hudak, Michael, 2015. "Three studies on applying Positive Mathematical Programming and Bayesian Analysis to model US crop supply," ISU General Staff Papers 201501010800005844, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Nugzar Todua & Teona Gogitidze, 2017. "Marketing Research Of Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Crops By Georgian Farmers," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 69-76, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:41:y:2012:i:03:p:377-390_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.