IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i4p338-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable Energy as a Catalyst for Equity? Integrating Inuit Interests With Nunavik Energy Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Paquet

    (School of Planning and Regional Development, Laval University, Canada)

  • Geneviève Cloutier

    (School of Planning and Regional Development, Laval University, Canada)

  • Myriam Blais

    (School of Architecture, Laval University)

Abstract

Nunavik’s residents experience significant social and environmental disruptions due to climate change. These disruptions add to the widespread changes that the Inuit have encountered over the last century—changes that have left this community totally dependent on fossil fuels for heat and power. Over time, Nunavik’s residents have taken control of petroleum resources and their distribution, transforming this energy source into a major regional economic asset. Recently, there has been a transition towards renewable energy technologies (RETs) in Nunavik. However, are these alternative sources of energy appealing to local residents? This article explores the potential of RETs through the lens of procedural and substantive equity in the context of Inuit interests and integrated sustainability. Based on informal discussions with Inuit residents, interviews with stakeholders of the energy transition in Nunavik, and a literature analysis, this article presents two main results: (1) The level of substantive equity depends mainly on the type of RET and on idiosyncrasies between communities, and (2) local governance and procedural equity need to be asserted so that RETs can become true catalysts for equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Paquet & Geneviève Cloutier & Myriam Blais, 2021. "Renewable Energy as a Catalyst for Equity? Integrating Inuit Interests With Nunavik Energy Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 338-350.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:4:p:338-350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4453
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Genevi�ve Cloutier & Florent Joerin & Catherine Dubois & Martial Labarthe & Christelle Legay & Dominique Viens, 2015. "Planning adaptation based on local actors' knowledge and participation: a climate governance experiment," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 458-474, July.
    2. Libby Porter & Lauren Rickards & Blanche Verlie & Karyn Bosomworth & Susie Moloney & Bronwyn Lay & Ben Latham & Isabelle Anguelovski & David Pellow & Libby Porter & Lauren Rickards & Blanche Verlie & , 2020. "Climate Justice in a Climate Changed World," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 293-321, June.
    3. Sara Meerow & Sierra C. Woodruff, 2020. "Seven Principles of Strong Climate Change Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 86(1), pages 39-46, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leopold, Franziska & Blum, Bianca & Walter, Larissa, 2023. "Tax-financed Basic Income – Comparison between three financing schemes and their normative implications," FRIBIS Policy Debate April 11, 2023, University of Freiburg, Freiburg Institute for Basic Income Studies (FRIBIS).
    2. Greg Oulahen & Linda Mortsch & Erin O’Connell & Deborah Harford & Alexandra Rutledge, 2019. "Local practitioners’ use of vulnerability and resilience concepts in adaptation to flood hazards," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 41-58, March.
    3. Kayleigh Swanson, 2021. "Equity in Urban Climate Change Adaptation Planning: A Review of Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 287-297.
    4. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "Off the Grid... and Back Again? The Recent Evolution of American Street Network Planning and Design," Papers 2010.04771, arXiv.org.
    5. Petra Tschakert & David Schlosberg & Danielle Celermajer & Lauren Rickards & Christine Winter & Mathias Thaler & Makere Stewart‐Harawira & Blanche Verlie, 2021. "Multispecies justice: Climate‐just futures with, for and beyond humans," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(2), March.
    6. Tschakert, Petra & Parsons, Meg & Atkins, Ed & Garcia, Alicea & Godden, Naomi & Gonda, Noemi & Henrique, Karen Paiva & Sallu, Susannah & Steen, Karin & Ziervogel, Gina, 2023. "Methodological lessons for negotiating power, political capabilities, and resilience in research on climate change responses," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Van Assche, Kristof & Birchall, Jeff & Gruezmacher, Monica, 2022. "Arctic and northern community governance: The need for local planning and design as resilience strategy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Reckien, Diana & Buzasi, Attila & Olazabal, Marta & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Eckersley, Peter & Simoes, Sofia G. & Salvia, Monica & Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Fokaides, Paris & Goonesekera, Sascha M. , 2023. "Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 1-14.
    9. Nicolas Rocle & Denis Salles, 2018. "“Pioneers but not guinea pigs”: experimenting with climate change adaptation in French coastal areas," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(2), pages 231-247, June.
    10. Mikael Granberg & Leigh Glover, 2021. "The Climate Just City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Stephan Hügel & Anna R. Davies, 2020. "Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    12. Usmaan Farooqui, 2020. "Politics of neutrality: Urban knowledge practices and everyday formalisation in Karachi’s waterscape," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2423-2439, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:4:p:338-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.