IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a10259.html

National Urban Policies as Instruments for Global Urban Agendas Localization: Lessons From Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Ferlicca

    (Urban School, Sciences Po, France)

Abstract

This article examines how national urban policies (NUPs) function as instruments for localising global frameworks, including the New Urban Agenda and SDGs. Using Argentina’s NUP development (2017–2019) as the primary case and Neuquén’s provincial implementation as a comparative example, this analysis reveals how international sustainability frameworks are translated across governance levels. The research employs stakeholder interviews and documentary analysis to examine policy formulation and implementation processes. Findings reveal significant challenges limiting NUP effectiveness: governance coordination difficulties, limited policy innovation despite international technical support, insufficient implementation mechanisms, and vulnerability to political transitions. These challenges were exacerbated by Argentina’s recent political shift under President Milei’s administration, characterized by state retrenchment and multilateral framework rejection. Argentina’s experience demonstrates that although global frameworks function as “coalition magnets” during policy formulation, sustained implementation requires deeper institutional anchoring beyond international legitimacy alone. The contrast between national policy abandonment and Neuquén’s continued engagement illustrates how federal systems create institutional redundancy for policy resilience. The analysis contributes to policy localisation scholarship by revealing how institutional context, temporal dynamics, actor networks, and implementation mechanisms interact across governance scales. Despite limitations, NUPs remain valuable vehicles for SDGs localisation when developed with appropriate consideration of existing institutional arrangements and implementation pathways, offering lessons for post‐2030 sustainability agenda design in multilevel governance systems experiencing political volatility. The Argentine case particularly highlights how federal structures can enable subnational continuity even when national support disappears, suggesting the importance of multi‐scalar approaches to global framework implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Ferlicca, 2025. "National Urban Policies as Instruments for Global Urban Agendas Localization: Lessons From Argentina," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:10259
    DOI: 10.17645/up.10259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/10259
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.10259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diane Stone, 2012. "Transfer and translation of policy," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 483-499.
    2. Ananya Roy, 2009. "The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 819-830.
    3. André Sorensen, 2018. "Institutions and Urban Space: Land, Infrastructure, and Governance in the Production of Urban Property," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 21-38, January.
    4. Parnell, Susan, 2016. "Defining a Global Urban Development Agenda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 529-540.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neil Brenner & Christian Schmid, 2014. "The ‘Urban Age’ in Question," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 731-755, May.
    2. Kathryn Davidson & Lars Coenen & Michele Acuto & Brendan Gleeson, 2019. "Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3540-3555, December.
    3. Dessie Elizabeth, 2018. "Applying resilience thinking to ‘ordinary’ cities: A theoretical inquiry," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 40(40), pages 57-67, June.
    4. Tom Goodfellow, 2018. "Seeing Political Settlements through the City: A Framework for Comparative Analysis of Urban Transformation," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(1), pages 199-222, January.
    5. Azunre, Gideon Abagna & Amponsah, Owusu & Takyi, Stephen Appiah & Mensah, Henry & Braimah, Imoro, 2022. "Urban informalities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A solution for or barrier against sustainable city development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Cavoli, Clemence, 2021. "Accelerating sustainable mobility and land-use transitions in rapidly growing cities: Identifying common patterns and enabling factors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Ellen Minkman, 2023. "Resolving impasses in policy translation: Shall we adjust the idea or the process?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 333-350, March.
    8. Meher Bhagia & Mallika Bose, 2024. "Who owns the city? Neoliberal urbanism and land purchases in Gurgaon, India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 445-461, February.
    9. Shin, HaeRan & Chae, Sangwon, 2018. "Urbanisation and land use transition in a second-tier city: The emergence of small factories in Gimpo, South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 534-541.
    10. Hillary Angelo & David Wachsmuth, 2015. "Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 16-27, January.
    11. Michael Storper & Allen J Scott, 2016. "Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1114-1136, May.
    12. Dani Broitman, 2020. "The Game of Developers and Planners: Ecosystem Services as a (Hidden) Regulation through Planning Delay Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Boussauw, Kobe, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 74-83.
    14. Anke Schwarz & Monika Streule, 2016. "A Transposition of Territory: Decolonized Perspectives in Current Urban Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 1000-1016, September.
    15. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    16. Liu, Yudi & Zeng, Erli & Luo, Lichen & Sho, Kojiro, 2025. "Transit-induced restructuring: On the mobility inequalities in Tokyo," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    17. Seth Schindler, 2014. "Understanding Urban Processes in Flint, Michigan: Approaching ‘Subaltern Urbanism’ Inductively," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 791-804, May.
    18. Rimjhim M. Aggarwal, 2013. "Strategic Bundling of Development Policies with Adaptation: An Examination of Delhi's Climate Change Action Plan," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1902-1915, November.
    19. Nadja Imhof & Martin Müller, 2020. "How international are geography journals? Not international enough," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1246-1249, October.
    20. André Sorensen & Anna-Katharina Brenner, 2021. "Cities, Urban Property Systems, and Sustainability Transitions: Contested Processes of Institutional Change and the Regulation of Urban Property Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:10259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.