IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v7y2019i3p91-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AMEND: Open Source and Data-Driven Oversight of Water Quality in New England

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Edward Sanders

    (Mystic River Watershed Association, USA)

Abstract

The advent of government transparency through online data publication should provide a transformative benefit to the information gathering practices of civic organizations and environmental advocates. However, environmental agencies and other reporters often disseminate this critical data only in siloed repositories and in technically complex, inconsistent formats, limiting its impact. We have developed a new open source web resource, the Archive of Massachusetts ENvironmental Data or AMEND, which curates information relating to federal, state, and local environmental stewardship in Massachusetts, focused on water quality. We describe the construction of AMEND, its operation, and the datasets we have integrated to date. This tool supports the development and advocacy of policy positions with published analyses that are fully reproducible, versioned, and archived online. As a case study, we present the first publicly reported analysis of the distributional impact of combined sewer overflows on Environmental Justice (EJ) communities. Our analysis of the historical geospatial distribution of these sewer overflows and block-level US Census data on EJ indicators tracking race, income, and linguistic isolation demonstrates that vulnerable communities in Massachusetts are significantly overburdened by this form of pollution. We discuss applications of this analysis to the state-level legislative process in Massachusetts. We believe that this approach to increasing the accessibility of regulatory data, and the code underlying AMEND, can serve as a model for other civic organizations seeking to leverage data to build trust with and advocate to policymakers and the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Edward Sanders, 2019. "AMEND: Open Source and Data-Driven Oversight of Water Quality in New England," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 91-103.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v7:y:2019:i:3:p:91-103
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i3.2136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2136
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, 2018. "Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 111-114.
    2. Byrne, John & Hughes, Kristen & Rickerson, Wilson & Kurdgelashvili, Lado, 2007. "American policy conflict in the greenhouse: Divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 4555-4573, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathan Edward Sanders, 2019. "AMEND: Open Source and Data-Driven Oversight of Water Quality in New England," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 91-103.
    2. Vallentin, Daniel, 2008. "Policy drivers and barriers for coal-to-liquids (CtL) technologies in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 3188-3201, August.
    3. Bolinger, Mark & Wiser, Ryan, 2009. "Wind power price trends in the United States: Struggling to remain competitive in the face of strong growth," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1061-1071, March.
    4. Deb Niemeier & Ryken Grattet & Thomas Beamish, 2015. "“Blueprinting†and climate change: Regional governance and civic participation in land use and transportation planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1600-1617, December.
    5. Jed J. Cohen, Levan Elbakidze, and Randall Jackson, 2020. "Solar Bait: How U.S. States Attract Solar Investments from Large Corporations," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 167-190.
    6. Altwies, Joy E. & Nemet, Gregory F., 2013. "Innovation in the U.S. building sector: An assessment of patent citations in building energy control technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 819-831.
    7. Saatvika Rai, 2020. "Policy Adoption and Policy Intensity: Emergence of Climate Adaptation Planning in U.S. States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(4), pages 444-463, July.
    8. Yonn Dierwechter & Anne Taufen Wessells, 2013. "The Uneven Localisation of Climate Action in Metropolitan Seattle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(7), pages 1368-1385, May.
    9. Giulia Gadani & Ibon Galarraga & Elisa Sainz de Murieta, 2019. "Regional climate change policies: An analysis of commitments, policy instruments and targets," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 49-74.
    10. Marra, Alessandro & Antonelli, Paola & Agostinone, Stefano & Raucci, Domenico, 2018. "Opening Pandora's box of twenty years of research on energy policies: On the rise of a ‘technology-driven’ debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 542-550.
    11. Xiaoyu Liu & Yanan Li & Xiao Zhang, 2024. "Can the Superposition of Green Policies Improve the Investment Efficiency of High-Polluting Firms Even More?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(10), pages 2773-2794, October.
    12. John Byrne & Job Taminiau, 2016. "A review of sustainable energy utility and energy service utility concepts and applications: realizing ecological and social sustainability with a community utility," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 136-154, March.
    13. Mignon Halderen & Mamta Bhatt & Guido A. J. M. Berens & Tom J. Brown & Cees Riel, 2016. "Managing Impressions in the Face of Rising Stakeholder Pressures: Examining Oil Companies’ Shifting Stances in the Climate Change Debate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 567-582, February.
    14. Lutsey, Nicholas P., 2008. "Prioritizing Climate Change Mitigation Alternatives: Comparing Transportation Technologies to Options in Other Sectors," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5rd41433, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    15. Stepp, Matthew D. & Winebrake, James J. & Hawker, J. Scott & Skerlos, Steven J., 2009. "Greenhouse gas mitigation policies and the transportation sector: The role of feedback effects on policy effectiveness," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2774-2787, July.
    16. Kai Wan & Yanjun Bu, 2024. "Environmental Policy Overlays and Urban Pollution and Carbon Reduction—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Hoffman, Steven M. & High-Pippert, Angela, 2010. "From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7567-7574, December.
    18. Taedong Lee, 2017. "The effect of clean energy regulations and incentives on green jobs: panel analysis of the United States, 1998–2007," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 145-155, August.
    19. Rajesh Sahu & Pramod Kumar, 2023. "The Missing Nexus: A Historical and Contemporary Position of the United States on Climate Change Action," International Studies, , vol. 60(4), pages 444-479, October.
    20. He, Ruofan & Wan, Panbing & Yang, Mian, 2024. "The resource curse in energy-rich regions: Evidence from China's ultra-high voltage transmission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v7:y:2019:i:3:p:91-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.