IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmn/journl/y2015i3p175-188.html

Evaluating Living Standard Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Nada Birciakova

    (Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics)

  • Jana Stavkova

    (Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics)

  • Veronika Antosova

    (Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics)

Abstract

This paper deals with the evaluation of selected available indicators of living standards, divided into three groups, namely economic, environmental, and social. We have selected six countries of the European Union for analysis: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Luxembourg, France, and Great Britain. The aim of this paper is to evaluate indicators measuring living standards and suggest the most important factors which should be included in the final measurement. We have tried to determine what factors influence each indicator and what factors affect living standards. We have chosen regression analysis as our main method. From the study of factors, we can deduce their impact on living standards, and thus the value of indicators of living standards. Indicators with a high degree of reliability include the following factors: size and density of population, health care and spending on education. Emissions of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere also have a certain lower degree of reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nada Birciakova & Jana Stavkova & Veronika Antosova, 2015. "Evaluating Living Standard Indicators," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 3, pages 175-188, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2015:i:3:p:175-188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eaco.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/birciakova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. K. Bennett, 1937. "On Measurement of Relative National Standards of Living," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(2), pages 317-336.
    2. Brent Bleys, 2012. "Beyond GDP: Classifying Alternative Measures for Progress," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 355-376, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Fabry & Goedele Broeck & Miet Maertens, 2022. "Gender Inequality and Job Satisfaction in Senegal: A Multiple Mediation Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 2291-2311, June.
    2. Kęstutis Biekša & Violeta Valiulė & Ligita Šimanskienė & Raffaele Silvestri, 2022. "Assessment of Sustainable Economic Development in the EU Countries with Reference to the SDGs and Environmental Footprint Indices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Marta Santagata & Enrico Ivaldi & Riccardo Soliani, 2019. "Development and Governance in the Ex-Soviet Union: An Empirical Inquiry," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 157-190, January.
    4. Giorgio Calcagnini & Francesco Perugini, 2019. "A Well-Being Indicator for the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 149-177, February.
    5. Ríos-Ocampo, Juan Pablo & Cunico, Giovanni & Gary, Michael Shayne, 2026. "Fragmentation and complexity as obstacles to the beyond GDP transition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    6. Mohammad Subhan & Aqsa Anjum & M. N. Zamir & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2024. "Do energy, inflation, and financial development stimulate economic welfare in India? Empirical insights from novel dynamic ARDL and KRLS simulations," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Martijn J. Burger & Sarah Courchesne & Talita Greyling & Kelsey J. O’Connor & Stephanié Rossouw & Francesco Sarracino & Ruut Veenhoven, 2026. "Using Subjective Well-being as a Headline Indicator in Dashboards to Track Human Progress," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 1735-1761, August.
    8. Claudio Berardino & Giuseppe Mauro & Davide Quaglione & Alessandro Sarra, 2016. "Industrial Districts and Socio-economic Well-Being: An Investigation on the Italian Provinces Disparities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 337-363, October.
    9. Watanabe, Chihiro & Naveed, Kashif & Neittaanmäki, Pekka & Tou, Yuji, 2016. "Operationalization of un-captured GDP - Innovation stream under new global mega-trends," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 58-77.
    10. Andrea Ciccarelli & Elena Fabrizi & Eleonora Romano & Pietro Zoppoli, 2022. "Health, Well-Being and Work History Patterns: Insight on Territorial Differences," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 629-647, June.
    11. Vincenzo Patrizii & Anna Pettini & Giuliano Resce, 2017. "The Cost of Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 985-1010, September.
    12. Alina Stundziene, 2019. "Human Welfare: Can We Trust What They Say?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 579-604, February.
    13. Margarida Casau & Marta Ferreira Dias & Gabriel Leite Mota, 2026. "Towards a wellbeing economy: Portuguese policymakers’ perspectives," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 73(1), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Gloria Polinesi & Mariateresa Ciommi & Chiara Gigliarano, 2024. "Impact of COVID-19 on elderly population well-being: evidence from European countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5201-5223, December.
    15. Massimo Aria & Michelangelo Misuraca & Maria Spano, 2020. "Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 803-831, June.
    16. Tomasz Panek, 2015. "Jakoœæ ¿ycia gospodarstw domowych w Polsce w uk³adzie wojewódzkim," Working Papers 76, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    17. Jonas Van der Slycken & Brent Bleys, 2021. "Towards ISEW and GPI 2.0, part II: Is Europe faring well with growth? Evidence from a welfare comparison in the EU-15 from 1995 to 2018," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 21/1027, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    18. van den Bergh, Jeroen, 2023. "Climate policy versus growth concerns: Suggestions for economic research and communication," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Jyoti Shukla & Norifumi Yukutake & Piyush Tiwari, 2021. "On Well-Being of Households in Japan and Post-Disaster Reinstatement," ADBI Working Papers 1214, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    20. Willem Deijl & Werner Brouwer & Job van Exel, 2023. "What Constitutes Well-being? Five Views Among Adult People from the Netherlands on what is Important for a Good Life," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(6), pages 3141-3167, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2015:i:3:p:175-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helena Campbelle The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Helena Campbelle to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eaco.eu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.