IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cje/issued/v47y2014i2p422-441.html

Viable Ramsey economies

Author

Listed:
  • Noël Bonneuil
  • Raouf Boucekkine

Abstract

The Ramsey model of economic growth is revisited from the perspective of viability theory. The Ramsey model, augmented with minimal consumption and sustainability criteria, becomes a viability problem. The framework allows for a clear picture of optimal viable, optimal nonviable, and viable nonoptimal paths. The drastic sacrifices in terms of present consumption required by the implementation of Brundtland sustainability are visualized, the rich countries bearing the major part of the burden. The econometric analysis of viability sets enhances the role of technological progress in ensuring Brundtland sustainability. Preference parameters such as the pure time preference rate are statistically nonsignificant.

Suggested Citation

  • Noël Bonneuil & Raouf Boucekkine, 2014. "Viable Ramsey economies," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 47(2), pages 422-441, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:47:y:2014:i:2:p:422-441
    DOI: 10.1111/caje.12084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12084
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/caje.12084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Girol Karacaoglu & Jacek B. Krawczyk, 2021. "Public policy, systemic resilience and viability theory," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 826-848, November.
    2. Marc Germain, 2016. "A simple degrowth model," Working Papers 2016.21, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    3. Pedro Gajardo & Luc Doyen, 2018. "Viability standards and multi-criteria maximin," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2018-04, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    4. Noël Bonneuil & Raouf Boucekkine, 2016. "Viable Nash Equilibria in the Problem of Common Pollution," Working Papers halshs-01341983, HAL.
    5. Jacek B. Krawczyk & Vladimir P. Petkov, 2022. "A Qualitative Game of Interest Rate Adjustments with a Nuisance Agent," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Phoebe Koundouri & Georgios I. Papayiannis & Athanasios Yannacopoulos, 2022. "Optimal Control Approaches to Sustainability under Uncertainty," DEOS Working Papers 2215, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    7. Germain, Marc, 2017. "Optimal Versus Sustainable Degrowth Policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 266-281.
    8. Bonneuil, N. & Boucekkine, R., 2016. "Optimal transition to renewable energy with threshold of irreversible pollution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 257-262.
    9. Valérie Angeon & Samuel Bates, 2020. "Implementing the agroecological transition: an analysis of decision-making rules in banana farming systems in the French West Indies [Mettre en œuvre la transition agroécologique : une analyse des ," Post-Print hal-03135324, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:47:y:2014:i:2:p:422-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Werner Antweiler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.