IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cii/cepiei/2001-3ta.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'Accord sur l'Agriculture de l'Uruguay Round fonctionne-t-il ?

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Tangermann

Abstract

Le Cycle de negociations de l'Uruguay qui a abouti, a introduit des changements radicaux aux regles du commerce international s'appliquant au secteur agricole. L'Accord sur l'agriculture a modifie en particulier les conditions d'octroi de subventions a l'exportation, contribuant a ramener ce secteur dans le cadre general du GATT. Neanmoins, sur d'autres aspects, la realite est plus complexe, comme dans les aspects sanitaires, ou paradoxalement les accords signes en 1995 contribuent a rendre plus "specifique" le traitement accorde a l'agriculture par le recours a des procedures d'evaluation scientifiques particulieres, ceci a un point tel que se posent des problemes d'acceptabilite sociale de ces accords. D'une maniere generale, les accords ont ete bien appliques et ont assez rarement donne lieu a des differends qui necessitent d'aller au bout de la procedure de reglement prevue. Neanmoins cela traduit les contraintes relativement faibles qui ont ete imposees au secteur, au moins sur la periode de mise en place. Les grands tests de validite des accords de l'Uruguay Round restent a venir, en particulier lorsque les marges de manoeuvre actuelles auront ete epuisees et que des nouvelles contraintes plus "mordantes" se feront sentir, lors d'un nouveau cycle de negociations.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Tangermann, 2001. "L'Accord sur l'Agriculture de l'Uruguay Round fonctionne-t-il ?," Economie Internationale, CEPII research center, issue 87, pages 15-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2001-3ta
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepii.fr/IE/rev87/rev87a.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carl GAIGNÉ & Cathie LAROCHE DUPRAZ & Alan MATTHEWS, 2015. "Thirty years of European research on international trade in food and agricultural products," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(1), pages 91-130.
    2. Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Beghin, John C. & de Cara, Stephane & Fang, Cheng & Isik, Murat & Matthey, Holger, 2003. "Agricultural Markets Liberalization And The Doha Round," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25875, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Bruce A. Babcock & John C. Beghin & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & Stephane De Cara & Amani Elobeid & Cheng Fang & Chad E. Hart & Murat Isik & Holger Matthey & Alexander E. Saak & Karen Kovarik & FAPRI Staff, 2002. "Doha Round of the World Trade Organization: Appraising Further Liberalization of Agricultural Markets, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp317, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Youssef Chahed & Sophie Drogue & Luca Salvatici, 2001. "Protection du secteur agricole dans les pays tiers : un outil pour les négociations du Millenium Round," Working Papers hal-02827128, HAL.
    5. Jay Fabiosa & John Beghin & Amani Elobeid & Holger Matthey & Alexander Saak & Stéphane de Cara & Cheng Fang & Murat Isik & Pat Westhoff & D. Scott Brown & Brian Willott & Daniel Madison & Seth Meyer &, 2005. "The Doha Round of the World Trade Organization and Agricultural Markets Liberalization: Impacts on Developing Economies," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(3), pages 317-335.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Politique agricole; subventions a l'exportation; acces au marche; barrieres non tarifaires;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2001-3ta. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepiifr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.