IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v68y2015i15p03-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU-Action Plan on Company Taxation: a Path to Greater Fairness and Efficiency in Taxation Policy?

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Schön
  • Dennis Klein
  • Markus Kerber
  • Martin Ruf
  • Tanja Kroh
  • Katharina Finke
  • Christoph Spengel
  • Andreas Oestreicher

Abstract

The EU Commission has presented a plan on a far-reaching overhaul of company taxation aimed at combatting abusive tax planning and securing long-term tax revenues. The measures aim to create a fairer, more efficient and growth-oriented taxation framework for companies in Europe. For Wolfgang Schön, Max-Planck-Institut für Steuerrecht und Öffentliche Finanzen, Munich, and University of Munich, the action plan features few items that have not already been discussed or announced. The entire text, however, makes it clear how far the Commission has drifted from its original European tax legislation goals. Dennis Klein, Leibniz-Fachhochschule Hannover, warns of excessively high expectations of the action plan. It is little more than a case of the European Commission doing something for the sake of it. For Markus Kerber, Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie, it is understandable that the Commission would like to take a tougher stance on tax evasion. This, however, should not remain a superficial discussion: the initial central aim of the EU project was to provide taxation policy support for the European internal market. In his opinion, the focus cannot be shifted to tax evasion in a project that is already so broad-ranging. The focus should be on harmonisation to increase the attractiveness of Europe as a business location. For Martin Ruf and Tanja Kroh, University of Tübingen, the EU action plan features selective approaches to solving the familiar problem of “tax planning to exploit international tax rate differences”. According to Katharina Finke, University of Mannheim and Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim, and Christoph Spengel, University Mannheim, the action plan provides fresh impetus for the further development of company taxation in Europe. The EU Commission should focus its attention on working on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). Andreas Oestreicher, University of Göttingen, highlights that the concept of the CCCTB offers protection against profit transfers within the EU. For member states, this would reduce the scope for damaging tax-based competition within the internal market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Schön & Dennis Klein & Markus Kerber & Martin Ruf & Tanja Kroh & Katharina Finke & Christoph Spengel & Andreas Oestreicher, 2015. "EU-Action Plan on Company Taxation: a Path to Greater Fairness and Efficiency in Taxation Policy?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68(15), pages 03-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:15:p:03-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2015-15-schoen-etal-unternehmensbesteuerung-2015-08-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Oestreicher & Reinald Koch, 2011. "The Revenue Consequences of Using a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base to Determine Taxable Income in the EU Member States," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 67(1), pages 64-102, March.
    2. Evers, Maria Theresia & Meier, Ina & Spengel, Christoph, 2014. "Transparency in financial reporting: Is country-by-country reporting suitable to combat international profit shifting?," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-015, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Finke, Katharina & Fuest, Clemens & Nusser, Hannah & Spengel, Christoph, 2014. "Extending taxation of interest and royalty income at source: An option to limit base erosion and profit shifting?," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-073, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Regina Ortmann & Erich Pummerer, 2023. "Distortional effects of separate accounting and formula apportionment on factor allocation," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(8), pages 1277-1307, October.
    2. Ortmann, Regina & Sureth, Caren, 2014. "Can the CCCTB alleviate tax discrimination against loss-making European multinational groups?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 165, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    3. Sijbren Cnossen, 2016. "Tackling Spillovers by Taxing Corporate Income in the European Union at Source," CPB Discussion Paper 324, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Regina Ortmann & Caren Sureth-Sloane, 2016. "Can the CCCTB alleviate tax discrimination against loss-making European multinational groups?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(5), pages 441-475, July.
    5. Simon Loretz & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2019. "Der EU-Vorschlag zur Harmonisierung der Körperschaftsteuer. Auswirkungen für Österreich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 92(1), pages 61-71, January.
    6. Steffen Juranek & Dirk Schindler & Guttorm Schjelderup, 2018. "Transfer pricing regulation and taxation of royalty payments," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(1), pages 67-84, February.
    7. Bodo Knoll & Nadine Riedel, 2020. "Patent Shifing and Anti-Tax Avoidance Legislation," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(04), pages 25-29, January.
    8. Evers, Maria Theresia & Finke, Katharina & Matenaer, Sebastian & Meier, Ina & Zinn, Benedikt, 2014. "Evidence on book-tax differences and disclosure quality based on the notes to the financial statements," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-047, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Anna Leszczyłowska, 2016. "Provisions for Future Liabilities and Effective Corporate Income Tax Rate," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 57-72.
    10. Wolfram F. Richter, 2022. "Granting Market Countries the Right to Tax Profit without Physical Nexus," CESifo Working Paper Series 9556, CESifo.
    11. Anita Atanassova, 2019. "Financial Accounting Aspects of Transfer Pricing," Economics and computer science, Publishing house "Knowledge and business" Varna, issue 2, pages 20-38.
    12. Dutt, Verena & Spengel, Christoph & Vay, Heiko, 2021. "Der EU-Vorschlag zum Country-by-Country Reporting im Internet: Kosten, Nutzen, Konsequenzen," Studien, Stiftung Familienunternehmen / Foundation for Family Businesses, number 250010, June.
    13. Dirk Kiesewetter & Tobias Steigenberger & Matthias Stier, 2018. "Can formula apportionment really prevent multinational enterprises from profit shifting? The role of asset valuation, intragroup debt, and leases," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(9), pages 1029-1060, December.
    14. Dutt, Verena & Spengel, Christoph & Vay, Heiko, 2017. "Der EU-Vorschlag zum Country-by-Country Reporting im Internet: Kosten, Nutzen, Konsequenzen," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 172786.
    15. Ortmann, Regina & Pummerer, Erich, 2015. "Formula apportionment or separate accounting? Tax-induced distortions of multinationals' locational investment decisions," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 198, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    16. Annelies Roggeman & Isabelle Verleyen & Philippe Van Cauwenberge & Carine Coppens, 2014. "Impact of a Common Corporate Tax Base on the effective tax burden in Belgium," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 530-543, June.
    17. Evers, Maria Theresia & Finke, Katharina & Köstler, Melanie & Meier, Ina & Scheffler, Wolfram & Spengel, Christoph, 2014. "Gemeinsame Körperschaftsteuer-Bemessungsgrundlage in der EU: Konkretisierung der Gewinnermittlungsprinzipien und Weiterentwicklungen," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-112, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Sijbren Cnossen, 2016. "Tackling Spillovers by Taxing Corporate Income in the European Union at Source," CESifo Working Paper Series 5790, CESifo.
    19. Jochen Hundsdoerfer & Julia Wagner, 2020. "How accurately does the CCCTB apportionment formula allocate profits? An evaluation of the European Commission proposal," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 495-536, May.
    20. S. Juranek & D. Schindler & A. Schneider, 2023. "Royalty taxation under tax competition and profit shifting," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 1377-1412, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:15:p:03-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.