IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2025v3p118-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities For Cross-Border Cooperation In Cultural And Event Tourism In The Counties Of North-West Region Of Romania

Author

Listed:
  • BREBAN (TIPROC) MANUELA

    (UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA)

  • BADULESCU DANIEL

    (UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA)

  • BADULESCU ALINA

    (UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA)

  • BORMA AFRODITA

    (UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA)

Abstract

The present study explores the opportunities and challenges of cross-border cooperation (CBC) in cultural and event tourism in the north-western counties of Romania. Cross-border cultural tourism involves visiting cultural heritage sites in border regions, promoting cultural diversity, and strengthening community ties and this research highlights the positive impact of this type of tourism on economic growth, cultural events’ s visibility and infrastructure investments. The best practices from European projects and initiatives abundantly demonstrate the importance of collaboration and information exchange between communities for the sustainable development of CBC in cultural tourism. Our research in the studied has identified various and solid historical and contemporary cultural relations between Romania, Hungary, and Ukraine, underling mutual influences and artistic collaborations, common interests, but also key obstacles, including cultural and linguistic differences, varying stakeholders and objectives, underdeveloped infrastructure, and geopolitical tensions and crises that can disrupt tourism flows, creating instability and uncertainty. Additionally, different regulatory frameworks between countries complicate the coordination and implementation of cross-border projects. Our study proposes solutions to overcome these challenges, such as promoting cooperation and partnerships, developing infrastructure, managing tourism sustainably, and last but not least a consistent access to European funds. Cross-border cultural tourism has significant potential for the economic, social, and cultural development of border regions, contributing to improved quality of life and the promotion of cultural values. By addressing the identified challenges and leveraging the opportunities, regions can foster sustainable and inclusive tourism that enhances cultural exchange and overall regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Breban (Tiproc) Manuela & Badulescu Daniel & Badulescu Alina & Borma Afrodita, 2025. "Opportunities For Cross-Border Cooperation In Cultural And Event Tourism In The Counties Of North-West Region Of Romania," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 118-129, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:3:p:118-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2025-03/10_Breban.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anssi Paasi, 1999. "Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse: The Finnish-Russian Border," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 669-680.
    2. Stella Kostopoulou & Dimitris Kourkouridis & Valia Xanthopoulou-Tsitsoni, 2015. "Rural Tourism Development And Cross-Border Cooperation: Networking Local Products Festivals," Tourism Research Institute, Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 10(1), pages 81-97, June.
    3. Badulescu Daniel & Badulescu Alina, 2017. "Rural Tourism Development through Cross-border Cooperation. The Case of Romanian-Hungarian Cross-border Area," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 191-208, December.
    4. Tamás Hardi & Marcell Kupi & Gyula Ocskay & Eszter Szemerédi, 2021. "Examining Cross-Border Cultural Tourism as an Indicator of Territorial Integration across the Slovak–Hungarian Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Stoica, Alina & Toca, Constantin-Vasile, 2010. "Romanian-Hungarian cross-border cultural and educational relations," MPRA Paper 62063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Enea Constanta, 2018. "The Dependence Of Internet Tourists In The Choice Of Tourist Destinations," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 32-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 123-152, September.
    2. Krisztina Czuczor & Gábor Kozma & Zoltán Dorogi & Tianyi Li & Zsolt Radics, 2023. "The Comprehensive Analysis of the Network of Superstructure Based on Territorial Characteristics of Accommodation and Food and Beverage Service Providers Considering the Financial Crisis and COVID-19:," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    3. A. B. Sebentsov & K. A. Morachevskaya & M. S. Karpenko, 2024. "The Russian–Belarusian Borderland: Contradictions of Integration and Cross-Border Regionalization. From Friendship to Cooperation?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 61-76, March.
    4. Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Borders as opportunities in the space-economy: towards a theory of enabling space," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 223-239, February.
    5. SOHN Christophe & LICHERON Julien, 2015. "From barrier to resource? Modelling the border effects on metropolitan functions in Europe," LISER Working Paper Series 2015-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    6. Vinayaraj V.K., 2011. "Finland’s Self-Defence Strategies," International Studies, , vol. 48(3-4), pages 257-280, July.
    7. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.
    8. Badulescu Daniel & Badulescu Alina, 2017. "Rural Tourism Development through Cross-border Cooperation. The Case of Romanian-Hungarian Cross-border Area," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 191-208, December.
    9. Anna A. Dekalchuk, 2014. "Schengen Borders In Practice: Facts About Finland (And Russia)," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/IR/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    10. Amelia Bucur, 2018. "The Entropy Of The Sustainable Development Of Rural Tourism Organizations In The Context Of Collaborative Economy," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 65-75, April.
    11. Jan A. Wendt & Vasile Grama & Gabriela Ilieş & Andrey S. Mikhaylov & Sorin G. Borza & Grigore Vasile Herman & Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska, 2021. "Transport Infrastructure and Political Factors as Determinants of Tourism Development in the Cross-Border Region of Bihor and Maramureş. A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Dimitris Kallioras & George Petrakos & Maria Tsiapa & Lefteris Topaloglou, 2011. "The Determinants of Growth in EU Border Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p702, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Sofia Karampela & Alexis Andreopoulos & Alex Koutsouris, 2021. "“Agro”, “Agri”, or “Rural”: The Different Viewpoints of Tourism Research Combined with Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Anna A. Mikhaylova & Jan A. Wendt & Dmitry V. Hvaley & Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska & Andrey S. Mikhaylov, 2022. "Impact of Cross-Border Tourism on the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas in the Russian–Polish and Russian–Kazakh Borderlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, February.
    15. Roberta Mingo, 2023. "The marginality trap. Deconstructing the administrative framework for a reform of local governance: The case of Calabria between top‐down and bottom‐up dynamics," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(7), pages 1458-1476, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:3:p:118-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.